Distinguished Speaker Series, Spring 2007 Presentation Outline - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Distinguished Speaker Series, Spring 2007 Presentation Outline - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
John Pillar John Pillar Hampton Inn & Hampton Inn & Suites Suites National Harbor, Md Md National Harbor, Advisor: Dr. Memari Memari Advisor: Dr. Distinguished Speaker Series, Spring 2007 Presentation Outline Presentation
Presentation Outline Presentation Outline
- Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
- Proposal
Proposal
- Structural Depth
Structural Depth – – PT Slab Investigation PT Slab Investigation
- Construction Breadth
Construction Breadth – – Cost and Construction Cost and Construction Impact Impact
Presentation Outline Presentation Outline
- Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
- Proposal
Proposal
- Structural Depth
Structural Depth – – PT Slab Investigation PT Slab Investigation
- Construction Breadth
Construction Breadth – – Cost and Construction Cost and Construction Impact Impact
Typical Floor Typical Floor
Existing Conditions Existing Conditions
- 10
10-
- 1/2
1/2” ” Concrete flat plate with 2 Concrete flat plate with 2-
- 1/2
1/2” ” drop drop panels panels
- 12
12” ”x24 x24” ” columns columns
- Spread footing foundations
Spread footing foundations
- Concrete shear wall lateral force resisting system
Concrete shear wall lateral force resisting system
- 11 stories above grade
11 stories above grade
- 10
10’ ’-
- 3
3” ” typical floor to floor height typical floor to floor height
- Designed under IBC 2003
Designed under IBC 2003
Presentation Outline Presentation Outline
- Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
- Proposal
Proposal
- Structural Depth
Structural Depth – – PT Slab Investigation PT Slab Investigation
- Construction Breadth
Construction Breadth – – Cost and Construction Cost and Construction Impact Impact
Presentation Outline Presentation Outline
- Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
- Proposal
Proposal
- Structural Depth
Structural Depth – – PT Slab Investigation PT Slab Investigation
- Construction Breadth
Construction Breadth – – Cost and Construction Cost and Construction Impact Impact
New Proposal New Proposal
- Replace original 10
Replace original 10-
- 1/2
1/2” ” normally reinforced slab with normally reinforced slab with thinner post thinner post-
- tensioned slab
tensioned slab
- lower seismic base shear
lower seismic base shear
- more economical system
more economical system
- Examine behavior:
Examine behavior:
- new lateral response
new lateral response
- punching shear conditions, slab deflection
punching shear conditions, slab deflection
- Footings, lateral force resisting system
Footings, lateral force resisting system
- Analyze new cost and schedule associated with flooring
Analyze new cost and schedule associated with flooring system switch system switch
Presentation Outline Presentation Outline
- Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
- Proposal
Proposal
- Structural Depth
Structural Depth – – PT Slab Investigation PT Slab Investigation
- Construction Breadth
Construction Breadth – – Cost and Construction Cost and Construction Impact Impact
Presentation Outline Presentation Outline
- Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
- Proposal
Proposal
- Structural Depth
Structural Depth – – PT Slab Investigation PT Slab Investigation
- Construction Breadth
Construction Breadth – – Cost and Construction Cost and Construction Impact Impact
PT slab is more economical PT slab is more economical
- Slimmer slab profile (8
Slimmer slab profile (8” ” vs. 10.5
- vs. 10.5”
”) )
- Punching shear predicted to be ok
Punching shear predicted to be ok
- Banded tendons spanning East
Banded tendons spanning East-
- West
West
- Uniform tendons spanning North
Uniform tendons spanning North-
- South
South
- Loading:
Loading: 40 40 psf psf (live) (live) 100 100 psf psf (dead) (dead) 28 28 psf psf (partitions, (partitions, m/e/p m/e/p) ) 168 168 psf psf
Column Adjustments Column Adjustments
Tendon Profiles, Latitudinal Tendon Profiles, Latitudinal
- 8
8” ” slab, cover requirements limit profile drape slab, cover requirements limit profile drape
- Tendons calculated to balance 90% of the dead
Tendons calculated to balance 90% of the dead load load
- 9 strands in exterior longitudinal spans
9 strands in exterior longitudinal spans
- 12 strands in interior spans
12 strands in interior spans
Tendon Profiles, Longitudinal Tendon Profiles, Longitudinal
- 3 strands per tendon
3 strands per tendon
- Tendons spaced at 3
Tendons spaced at 3’ ’-
0” ” to 4 to 4’ ’-
0” ” o.c
- .c.
.
- End profiles terminated at center of slab
End profiles terminated at center of slab
- Coordinate with slab openings/penetrations
Coordinate with slab openings/penetrations
PT investigation continued PT investigation continued
- 12
12” ” x 24 x 24” ” columns adequate for punching shear columns adequate for punching shear in all locations in all locations
- Punching shear was found to be ok for worst case
Punching shear was found to be ok for worst case column, column, φ φVc Vc=110k>Vu=57k =110k>Vu=57k
- Long term deflection is within appropriate limits
Long term deflection is within appropriate limits
- Maximum deflection:
Maximum deflection:
- positive
positive – – 0.6 0.6” ”
- negative
negative – – 0.2 0.2” ”
Slab Stresses at Slab Stresses at Midspan Midspan
- f
fb
b at jacking: 146
at jacking: 146 psi psi Allowable: 0.6f Allowable: 0.6f’ ’c ci
i=1800psi
=1800psi
- f
ft
t at jacking:
at jacking: -
- 292
292 psi psi Allowable: 3 Allowable: 3√ √f f’ ’c ci
i=164psi
=164psi
- f
fb
b at service: 370
at service: 370 psi psi Allowable: 0.45f Allowable: 0.45f’ ’c=2250psi c=2250psi
- f
ft
t at service:
at service: -
- 780
780 psi psi Allowable: 6 Allowable: 6√ √f f’ ’c=424psi c=424psi
- f
f’ ’c c=5000 =5000 psi psi
- f
f’ ’c ci
i=3000
=3000 psi psi
- All conditions meet code, slab is ok
All conditions meet code, slab is ok
Other considerations Other considerations
- Overall building weight reduced by 11%
Overall building weight reduced by 11%
- Seismic base shear decreased by 11% with weight
Seismic base shear decreased by 11% with weight savings, from 594k to 530k savings, from 594k to 530k
- lateral system redesign unnecessary
lateral system redesign unnecessary
- 70k reduced axial load on worst case column, footings
70k reduced axial load on worst case column, footings were found to be same size or very similar were found to be same size or very similar
- footing redesign unnecessary
footing redesign unnecessary
- Wind drift decreased by 0.8
Wind drift decreased by 0.8” ”
- Seismic drift decreased by 1.5
Seismic drift decreased by 1.5” ”
Presentation Outline Presentation Outline
- Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
- Proposal
Proposal
- Structural Depth
Structural Depth – – PT Slab Investigation PT Slab Investigation
- Construction Breadth
Construction Breadth – – Cost and Construction Cost and Construction Impact Impact
Presentation Outline Presentation Outline
- Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
- Proposal
Proposal
- Structural Depth
Structural Depth – – PT Slab Investigation PT Slab Investigation
- Construction Breadth
Construction Breadth – – Cost and Cost and Construction Impact Construction Impact
Cost savings of $156,760 Cost savings of $156,760
- Increased cost for stressing tendons & labor
Increased cost for stressing tendons & labor +$360,570 +$360,570
- Decreased cost for rebar
Decreased cost for rebar
- $111,800
$111,800
- Decreased cost for slab
Decreased cost for slab
- $380,000
$380,000
- Other savings
Other savings
- $25,530
$25,530
$ $156,760
156,760
This equates to a savings of approximately $172,100 after location and inflation are considered
Cost savings of $156,760 Cost savings of $156,760
- Increased cost for stressing tendons & labor
Increased cost for stressing tendons & labor +$360,570 +$360,570
- Decreased cost for rebar
Decreased cost for rebar
- $111,800
$111,800
- Decreased cost for slab
Decreased cost for slab
- $380,000
$380,000
- Other savings
Other savings
- $25,530
$25,530
$ $156,760
156,760
This equates to a savings of approximately $172,100 after location and inflation are considered
Savings equivalent: 24,586 engineering computation pads (200 page tablet)
Schedule Changes Schedule Changes
- +6.1 extra days per floor to place & stress
+6.1 extra days per floor to place & stress tendons tendons
- 2.6 less days per floor for rebar placement
2.6 less days per floor for rebar placement
- 2.5
2.5 less days per floor for slab placement labor less days per floor for slab placement labor =1 =1
- 1 extra day per floor to change floor systems, 11
1 extra day per floor to change floor systems, 11 extra days total extra days total
Conclusion Conclusion – – PT system PT system recommended recommended
- Pros:
Pros:
- eliminate drop panels
eliminate drop panels
- max slab deflection =
max slab deflection = L/580 L/580
- save
save $172,100 $172,100
- decreased drift from
decreased drift from wind and seismic due wind and seismic due to less severe P to less severe P-
- delta
delta effects effects
- Cons:
Cons:
- slab shrinks, cracks
slab shrinks, cracks due to due to prestress prestress
- can be treated with
can be treated with pour stops pour stops
- schedule elongated by
schedule elongated by 11 days 11 days
- maintenance of
maintenance of tendons tendons
- increased coordination
increased coordination needed needed
Distinguished Speaker Series Distinguished Speaker Series
- In case you missed it, encore showings will take
In case you missed it, encore showings will take place place tonight tonight at the following locations: at the following locations:
Distinguished Speaker Series Distinguished Speaker Series
- In case you missed it, encore showings will take
In case you missed it, encore showings will take place place tonight tonight at the following locations: at the following locations:
- Bill Pickles
Bill Pickles’ ’ Tap Room Tap Room 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
- The All American
The All American Rathskeller Rathskeller 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
- The
The Phyrst Phyrst 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
- Caf
Café é 210 West 210 West 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
- The Saloon
The Saloon 12:00 am 12:00 am
- Zeno
Zeno’ ’s Pub s Pub 12:30 am 12:30 am
- The Shandygaff
The Shandygaff 1:00 am 1:00 am
- Mad
Mad Mex Mex 1:30 am 1:30 am
Thanks! Thanks!
- OTO Development
OTO Development
- Hope
Hope Furrer Furrer Associates, Inc. Associates, Inc.
- All AE faculty
All AE faculty
- Online thesis mentors, all options (even CM)
Online thesis mentors, all options (even CM)
- Everyone else who was involved