constitutive models of prestressed steel fiber concrete
play

Constitutive Models of Prestressed Steel-Fiber Concrete Christopher - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Constitutive Models of Prestressed Steel-Fiber Concrete Christopher P. Caruso Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Houston NSF REU Program August 2007 Outline of Presentation Introduction Experimental Program


  1. Constitutive Models of Prestressed Steel-Fiber Concrete Christopher P. Caruso Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Houston NSF REU Program August 2007

  2. Outline of Presentation • Introduction • Experimental Program • Results • Discussion • Conclusions

  3. Introduction

  4. Purpose • Investigate the behavior of prestressed steel- fiber concrete (PSFC) under shear. – Can steel fibers replace traditional shear stirrups? • Is this a practical and economical improvement? TXDOT sponsored project

  5. Prestressed Concrete • High transverse load-bearing capacity – Initial compressive stress • Used commonly in highway bridge girders. − − − + +

  6. Steel Fiber Concrete • Concrete with short steel wires mixed in. • Known to reduce crack propagation – Absorb energy released when a crack opens Energy Crack Without Steel Fibers P P Energy With Steel Fig. 3 . Cracked Concrete Fibers Panel under a tensile load P .

  7. Constitutive Models • Relate Stress and Strain in a material. – Eg. Prestressed Concrete • Must be determined experimentally. • Can be used to analyze indeterminate structures – Consider with force equilibrium and strain compatibility Sometimes referred to as “Stress-Strain Curve”

  8. Research Significance • Earthquake load simulation • Hollow Bridge Piers subjected to reverse cyclic loading (Yeh and Mo 1999) – Full-scale shake-table test Universal joint Load Cell Cross beam Oil jack 1500 Load Cell Hinge a Actuator 64-#7 j i b Column 900 Reaction 1500 Wall 900 Dial gauge #3@200 300 Cross RC Foundation beam Universal Strong Floor joint 66 168 132 168 132 168 132 168 132 168 66

  9. Research Significance • Constitutive Models N N N 3 3 3 P are used to P P 3 3 3 accurately predict Rigid Beam structure behavior. Nonlinear • Construct a Finite BeamColumn Elements Element Model A A (a) Elevation view

  10. Objective • Investigate Behavior of Prestressed Steel-Fiber Concrete (PSFC). – Construct PSFC panels. – Test panels in sequential loading. • Tension  Compression • Record applied loads and panel deformations. – Analyze data. • Determine stress strain curves for concrete and prestressing tendons. – Compare to prestressed concrete panel data.

  11. Experimental Program

  12. Experiment Plan • Fabricate two PSFC panels for testing – TEF1: 0.5 % Steel Fibers by volume. – TEF2: 1.0 % Steel Fibers by volume. • Test panels in Universal Element Tester – Tension – Compression • Collect load & deformation data – Jack Load Sensors – Linear Variable Differential Transformers (LVDT)

  13. Panel Design • Concrete – Type 1 Portland Cement – 6 ksi Compressive Strength – 7 in. Slump • Reinforcement – 10 steel prestressing tendons. – 10 steel compression bars. – Dramix short hook-end steel fibers

  14. t l Unit: mm

  15. t l

  16. Loaded UET Empty UET

  17. Test Procedure • Tensile load to 40 kips • Tensile strain to 1% • Tensile strain to 1.5% • Tensile strain to 2% • Compressive load to 30 kips • Compressive strain to crushing failure

  18. Results

  19. Test Results • TEF1 experienced premature tendon failure – Most tension data was recoverable • TEF2 was not tested due to malfunctioning servo control box – Will be tested once box is repaired • TEF1 data compared to prestressed panel data – Jung Wang, Ph.D student

  20. Experimental Stress vs. Strain

  21. Concrete Stress vs. Strain

  22. Prestressing Tendon Stress vs. Strain

  23. Discussion

  24. Questions • Why did TEF1 experience premature tendon failure? • What do the stress strain curves indicate about the panel’s behavior?

  25. TEF1 Failure • Severe cracks formed at panel boundaries – Disproportionately higher tendon loads during test. • Tendon conduits not fully grouted – Short lengths near panel boundaries experienced unacceptably high strain.

  26. t Severe Tendon Bracket Crack Friction Severe Severe Plate Crack Crack Chuck Prestressing Concrete tendon l Ungrouted Flexible Metal Region Conduit Tendon U- Tendon Bracket Chuck

  27. Conclusions

  28. Conclusions • TEF1 stress-strain curves appear well predicted by prestressed constitutive models. • Despite premature tendon failure, results are promising for success of future tests.

  29. Future Work • Apply maximum compressive load through friction plates • Apply high-strength grout between friction plates and panel • Use tubes to pre-form bolt holes for friction plates

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend