Disclosures Your Patient Has Carotid Bulb Stenosis and a Chief - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

disclosures
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Disclosures Your Patient Has Carotid Bulb Stenosis and a Chief - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

4/16/2015 Disclosures Your Patient Has Carotid Bulb Stenosis and a Chief Medical Officer: ChemoFilter Scientific advisory: Medina Medical Tandem Intracranial Stenosis: Consulting: Stryker Neurovascular, Silk Road Medical How Do


slide-1
SLIDE 1

4/16/2015 1

Your Patient Has Carotid Bulb Stenosis and a Tandem Intracranial Stenosis: How Do SAMMPRIS and 
Other Evidence Inform Your Treatment?

UCSF Vascular Symposium 2015

Steven W. Hetts, MD Associate Professor of Radiology Interventional Neuroradiology University of California, San Francisco

Disclosures

  • Chief Medical Officer: ChemoFilter
  • Scientific advisory: Medina Medical
  • Consulting: Stryker Neurovascular, Silk Road Medical
  • Data Safety and Monitoring Committee: DAWN trial
  • Core Imaging Lab: MAPS, FRED, SURMOUNT, and ATLAS

trials

  • Grant support: NIBIB, NCI, Siemens
  • I will discuss off-label uses of devices (stents, balloons)
  • I have borrowed liberally from my colleagues and

acknowledge their kind help: Christopher Dowd, MD, Joey English, MD, PhD, Daniel Cooke, MD, Peter Jun, MD, Van Halbach, MD, Randall Higashida, MD

Lecture Outline

  • Cervical Atherosclerotic Disease
  • Scope of disease
  • Trials
  • Practical considerations
  • Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease
  • Scope of disease
  • Trials
  • Practical considerations
  • Future directions

CREST Trial: Summary

Brott et al, NEJM 2010 363:11-23

  • Composite death, stroke, and MI does not

differ between CAS and CEA in sxs and asx patients

  • Paradoxically, in patients under 70 years, CAS

may be more advantageous than in patients

  • ver 70 years
  • Higher periprocedural stroke risk with CAS
  • Higher periprocedural MI risk with CEA
slide-2
SLIDE 2

4/16/2015 2

CAS: Patient Selection

  • Hemodynamically Significant > 50-70%
  • Failed Medical Therapy
  • Clinically Symptomatic

– Stroke – TIA – Focal Neurological Signs – Amaurosis Fugax

Carotid Stenting Indications

  • High Risk Surgical Patients

– Severe Coronary or Pulmonary Disease – Recent MI, Stroke

  • Surgically Difficult Access

– Lesions arising off Aortic Arch – Lesions above the Mandible >C2 – All Intracranial Lesions

  • Traumatic or Spontaneous Dissections

Relative Carotid Stenting Indications

  • Multiple Vessel Disease

– Occlusion of Contralateral Carotid or Vertebral – Tandem Stenosis with Intracranial Lesion

  • Recurrent Stenosis Post Endarterectomy
  • History of Cervical Radiation
  • Long Segment Lesions >4 cm
  • Traumatic Carotid Pseudoaneurysms

Pre Treatment Assessment

  • Complete Neurological

Assessment

  • Brain MRI/CT Scan
  • Anti-Platelet Medications
  • Cerebral Blood Flow

Studies

  • Complete Angiographic

Assessment

slide-3
SLIDE 3

4/16/2015 3

Case Example

53 yo F with progressive stepwise L hemiparesis

Tandem cervical ICA and MCA stenoses

Treatment options

  • Medical management
  • Stent cervical ICA under conscious sedation
  • Stent cervical ICA under MAC
  • Stent cervical ICA under GA
  • Stent cervical ICA and PTA MCA under GA
  • Stent cervical ICA and stent MCA under GA
  • ECA-ICA bypass
  • Run the other way
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4/16/2015 4

Cervical ICA stenting

Cerebral diagnostic DSA pre ICA stent Cerebral DSA pre and post ICA stent

Initially no change in HP post ICA stenting, then worsening HP

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4/16/2015 5

Original DWI before ICA stenting New areas of temporal ischemia Now what would you do?

  • Medical management
  • ICU pressor challenge
  • PTA MCA
  • Stent MCA
  • ECA-ICA bypass
  • Run the other way
  • Get more imaging

CT Perfusion

rCBV MTT

slide-6
SLIDE 6

4/16/2015 6

CT Perfusion

rCBV MTT

M2 MCA severe stenosis ICAD: Scope of Disease

  • 8-10% of strokes and TIAs in USA due to ICAD
  • 70,000-90,000 strokes/TIAs per year
  • Recurrent stroke risk 15-25% per year
  • Higher ICAD rate in Black, Asian, and Hispanic

populations

Medical Therapy for ICAD

  • Anticoagulation for ICAD described in 1955
  • Retrospective studies suggested warfarin was

superior to ASA for ICAD stroke prevention

  • WASID (2005): landmark prospective trial

comparing ASA to warfarin for recurrent stroke/TIA prevention

  • WASID showed no benefit of warfarin over

ASA and increased risk of bleeding

slide-7
SLIDE 7

4/16/2015 7

ECA-ICA Bypass for ICAD

  • Described in 1967 to prevent stroke in

patients with symptomatic ICA or MCA stenoses

  • Prospective ECIC bypass trial (NEJM 1985)

– 1377 pts randomized to bypass or medical tx – ECIC bypass no better for ICA lesions – ECIC bypass worse for severe MCA stenoses

  • COSS Trial (stopped in 2010 by NIH)

– ECIC bypass for carotid occlusion patients with increased oxygen extraction fraction by PET

PTA and Stenting for ICAD

  • WASID trial suggested that best medical therapy

for ICAD still had high risk for recurrent stroke

  • Reasonable to research PTA and stenting as well

as new medications for ICAD

  • Off label use of coronary PTA balloons since

1980s

  • Off label use of coronary stents since 1990s
  • SAMMPRIS Trial

– Randomized symptomatic ICAD patients to medical therapy (ASA/clopidogrel) or stent designed for ICAD plus ASA/clopidogrel

M2 MCA severe stenosis MCA PTA

slide-8
SLIDE 8

4/16/2015 8

Stenting catheter navigation MCA stenting DSA post MCA revascularization DSA before ICA and MCA stenting

slide-9
SLIDE 9

4/16/2015 9

DSA post MCA revascularization

Intracranial Atherosclerosis: Ischemic Stroke Mechanisms

  • 1. Flow-limiting -> Hypoperfusion -> Deep Watershed Ischemia
  • 2. Distal Emboli -> Wedged-Shaped Cortical Infarcts
  • 3. Perforator Injury -> Deep “Lacunar” Infarcts

Predicted Event Rates: 30 day 1 year Medical Arm 11% 25% Stenting Arm 5-9% 8-15% SAMMPRIS TRIAL Predicted Event Rates: 30 day 1 year Medical Arm 11% (5.8%) 25% Stenting Arm 5-9% (14.7%) 8-15% SAMMPRIS TRIAL

slide-10
SLIDE 10

4/16/2015 10

WINGSPAN STENT SYSTEM

  • 1. Flow-limiting -> Hypoperfusion -> Deep Watershed Ischemia
  • 2. Distal Emboli -> Wedged-Shaped Cortical Infarcts
  • 3. Perforator Injury -> Deep “Lacunar” Infarcts

Potential Complications

  • 4. Reperfusion Injury -> Edema and/or Hemorrhage
  • 5. Procedural -> Wire Perforation, SAH/IPH

Important SAMMPRIS Information to Follow

  • 1. Influence of Presenting Pattern of

Ischemia and/or Location of Stenosis

  • n the Risk of Procedural Ischemia
  • 2. Extent/Location of Infarction and

Timing of Revascularization

Future Directions in Cervical and Intracranial Atherosclerosis

  • Medical

– new antiplatelets – statins

  • Surgical

– CEA for many, CAS for some

  • Endovascular: optimization of stenting

– Distal emboli – Perforator occlusion – Patient selection based on stroke type

Thank You

steven.hetts@ucsf.edu