Disclosures Research Grants: Amgen, AbbVie, Orthotropix, Pfizer, - - PDF document

disclosures
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Disclosures Research Grants: Amgen, AbbVie, Orthotropix, Pfizer, - - PDF document

6/23/2015 Osteoporosis and Chronic Kidney Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendations Nancy E. Lane, MD Director, Center for Musculoskeletal Health Endowed Professor of Medicine and Rheumatology University of California at Davis Sacramento,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

6/23/2015 1

Osteoporosis and Chronic Kidney Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendations

Nancy E. Lane, MD Director, Center for Musculoskeletal Health Endowed Professor of Medicine and Rheumatology University of California at Davis Sacramento, California

Disclosures

  • Research Grants: Amgen, AbbVie,

Orthotropix, Pfizer, Regeneron, Myosicience

  • Scientific boards: none
  • Consultant: Pfizer, Merck, Celgene
  • Data Safety Monitoring Board: Mesoblast
  • Speakers bureaus: none
  • Equity: none
slide-2
SLIDE 2

6/23/2015 2

NKF‐Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease

  • Stage 1 CKD: GFR < 110 ml/min with evidence
  • f intrinsic renal damage (proteinuria, etc)
  • Stage 2 CKD: GFR < 90‐60 ml/min (with

evidence of intrinsic renal damage)

  • Stage 3 CKD: GFR 60‐30 ml/min (no need for

evidence of intrinsic renal damage)

  • Stage 4 CKD: GFR 30‐15 ml/min
  • Stage 5 CKD < 15 ml/min or ESRD

KDOQI Guidelines Am J Kid Dis 2002

Average Estimated GFR by Age

Coresh J et al. Am J Kid Dis. 2003;41:1.

150 120 90 60 30 20 40 60 80 100 Age, years GFR mL/min/1.73 m2

NHANES III GFR calculation (MDRD) NHANES III Cockcroft-Gault

MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease

slide-3
SLIDE 3

6/23/2015 3

NHANES III (1999‐2004) Prevalence of CKD in USA Population

  • In persons 60+ years of age and older: 39%
  • Stage 3 CKD (GFR 60‐30 ml/min) represented

the greatest proportion: 20%

  • More common in non‐Hispanic Blacks and

Mexican‐Americans than non‐Hispanic Whites.

  • More common in diabetics and persons with

hypertension

Coresh J et al Am J Kid Dis 2003

Fracture Risk is Very High In Stage 5 CKD

  • ~ 50 % prevalence of fractures
  • ~ 50% excess mortality as compared to age‐

matched controls without stage 5 CKD

  • Fractures occur ~ 10 years earlier than age‐

matched, BMD matched patients without CKD

  • Hip fractures risk 17X higher than age‐

matched patients without stage 5 CKD

slide-4
SLIDE 4

6/23/2015 4

FRAX Adjustments

  • Fracture risk appears to be 2X greater by

stage 3 CKD

  • FRAX did not validate GFR
  • Primary care and specialists see a great deal of

stage 3 CKD (eGFR 60‐30 ml/min)

  • Stage 3 CKD was present in a large proportion
  • f all registration clinical trials for osteoporosis

therapies.

Miller PD Clev Clin Med J 2009

The Interactions Between the Parathyroid Glands, Kidneys, Bone and Systemic Vasculature: The Bond Between Bone and Body

Ca Absorption P Absorption

1,25 D

PTH

 Ca and P

FGF 23

Serum P

PTH Osteoblast Activity

Osteoclast Osteocyte

FGF 23  PTH

Osteoblast

PTH  1,25 D PTH  P Reabsorption FGF 23  1,25 D FGF 23  P Reabsorption

GFR ↓ SCLEROSTIN

slide-5
SLIDE 5

6/23/2015 5

Why is Bone Strength Impaired in CKD? theories beyond BMD/Age/Prior fracture

  • Reduced Bone Quality from elevated turnover
  • r reduced bone formation

– Elevated PTH – Phosphorus and pyrophosphate retention‐ – Elevated FGF 23 – Elevated sclerostin‐reduced osteogenesis – Chronic metabolic acidosis – Sarcopenia and poor muscle function

  • Reduced osteogenesis and reduced balance

Serum sclerostin as a function of CKD stage based on GFR measured by inulin clearance

CJSAN May 2013 * Volume 8, No. 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6/23/2015 6

The Fracture

Is it “Osteoporosis” or is it Fracture related to decreased GFR per se?

The Clinical Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in Specific Populations (PMO, elderly men, etc) can be made by:

  • Low trauma fractures (once other causes of

fragility fractures are excluded, e.g.

  • steogenesis imperfecta, osteomalacia, etc)
  • World Health Organization (WHO) bone

mineral density criteria using central dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA): T‐score ‐ 2.5 or lower

Schousboe J, Vokes T, Broy S et al. J Clin Densit 2008 Kanis J et al. WHO Technical Report, Geneva, Switzerland 1994

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6/23/2015 7

Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in Populations with Known Reduced GFR

  • Stage 1‐3 CKD (GFR <90 ‐30 ml/min): same as

patients without NKF defined by CKD if no

  • ther biochemical abnormalities suggesting

CKD‐MBD.

  • Stage 4‐5 CKD (GFR < 30 ml/min): Cannot use

WHO criteria and/or fragility fractures since all forms of severe renal osteodystrophy (histomorphometry defined) may have low T‐ scores or low trauma fractures

Moe S et al KI 2009 Miller PD Sem Dialysis 2008

Definition of Chronic Kidney Disease‐Mineral and Bone Disorder CKD‐MBD

A systemic disorder of mineral and bone metabolism due to CKD manifested by either one

  • r a combination of the following:

– Abnormalities of calcium, phosphorus, PTH, or vitamin D metabolism – Abnormalities in bone turnover, mineralization, volume, linear growth, or strength – Vascular or other soft tissue calcification Moe S et al KI 2008

slide-8
SLIDE 8

6/23/2015 8

Stage 4‐5 CKD

May have CKD‐MBD which is clinically suspected if patients have hyperphosphatemia or elevated PTH

Moe S et al Kid Internat 2008

Prevalence of Elevated iPTH by eGFR Intervals

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 >80 79-70 69-60 59-50 49-40 39-30 29-20 <20 Abnormal High ( > 65 pg/mL)

(N=61) (N=117) (N=230) (N=396) (N=355) (N=358) (N=204) (N=93)

Percent of Patients

Levin A et al. et al KI 2007

slide-9
SLIDE 9

6/23/2015 9

Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

  • Low 25 OH D/hypocalcemia
  • Calcium malabsorption or intake
  • Hypercalciuria
  • Chronic kidney disease (and acute renal

failure)

  • Low 1,25 D despite normal 25 OH D
  • Lithium use
  • Calcyolytic agents

Miller PD JCD 2011

Different Stages of CKD and Bone Turnover

  • Stage 1‐3 have rarely been associated with

adynamic bone disease or osteomalacia‐ unless there is an underlying associated condition (diabetes, aluminum accumulation, reasons for osteomalacia).

  • Stage 4‐5 are clearly associated with severe

bone turnover abnormalities.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

6/23/2015 10

Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover

37

Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism

AP / BAP (S) Osteocalcin (S) P1CP / P1NP (S)

Resorption

Crosslinks and crosslinked telopeptides NTX, CTX (U, S) Hydroxyproline (U) Calcium (U)

Formation

Osteoblasts Osteoclasts

slide-11
SLIDE 11

6/23/2015 11

3 Bone Turnover Markers Unaffected by GFR

  • BSAP
  • PINP
  • TRAP5b (unavailable commercially)

Two Bone Diseases to Avoid “turning bone turnover down”

  • Osteomalacia
  • Adynamic bone disease
slide-12
SLIDE 12

6/23/2015 12

B 100X Increased Osteoid D 100X Osteoid Peri-osteocytic Osteoid C 100X No label Single label Diffuse label A 25X Thick Trabeculae

Von Kossa, H&E Stain for Calcium and Osteoid: Osteomalacia Unstained, Fluorescent for Tetracycline Von Kossa, H&E Stain, Fluorescent for Osteoid

Osteomalacia: always has a cause

  • Severe 25 OHD deficiency (< 8 ng/ml).
  • Chronic hypophosphatemia
  • Vitamin D resistant rickets
  • Renal tubular acidosis
  • Oncogenic osteomalacia (low serum PO⁴,

elevated FGF 23, low, 1, 25 D, phosphaturia)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

6/23/2015 13

Biochemical Tests to Screen for Etiologies of Osteomalacia

  • 25D
  • 1,25D
  • Serum and urine phosphorus
  • Electrolytes, arterial blood gases, urine pH
  • FGF 23
  • Elevated BSAP

Elevated BSAP

Excludes adynamic bone disease (unless there has been a recent fracture)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

6/23/2015 14

Adynamic Bone Disease

Absence of single tetracycline labels

slide-15
SLIDE 15

6/23/2015 15

Renal Adynamic Bone Disease

Miller PD CJASN 2007

Biomarkers in Stage 4‐5 CKD

  • 1. An elevated BSAP excludes adynamic bone disease and is not

seen in osteoporosis if other causes of elevated BSAP are excluded (Paget’s, metastatic Ca, etc)

  • 2. An elevated BSAP (6X the upper limit of the normal range)

with intact PTH most likley excludes adynamic bone disease

  • 3. A normal BSAP or a normal or mild elevation of PTH does not

exclude adynamic bone disease.

  • 4. A PTH < 150 pg/ml and a lower quartile BSAP: high PPV for

adynamic bone disease.

Miller PD. Up‐to‐Date 2012

slide-16
SLIDE 16

6/23/2015 16

Bone Biopsy in CKD

  • Is the “gold standard” for diagnosis of renal bone

disease and for defining the bone turnover activity.

  • Is especially important before bone turnover is

“turned down”

  • Requires double tetracycline labeling for

quantitative bone histomorphometry

  • Is safe and has very low morbidity (including post‐op

pain) in experienced operators

Preliminary Data Exists

  • That even in mild (stage 3) CKD

(GFR: 60‐30 ml/min) bone turnover may be reduced, fracture risk increased, And ……..

  • Reduced bone turnover may be linked to the

greater risk for systemic vascular disease so prevalent in CKD

Hruska K et al Seminars Dialysis 2007 Cohen G J Nephrol 2005 Dukas LC et al OI 2005 Towler D et al Nature Rev Endocrinol 2012

slide-17
SLIDE 17

6/23/2015 17

Total Alkaline Phosphatase vs BSAP

  • Low BSAP is the test for possible adynamic

bone disease

  • Low total alkaline phosphatase is the test for

possible hypophosphatasia (HPP)

Low BSAP

  • HPP
  • Renal adynamic bone disease
  • Treatment with anti‐resorptive agents
  • Hypoparathyroidism
  • Vitamin D intoxication (perhaps via hypercalcemia and PTH

suppression)

  • Celiac disease
  • Cardiac bypass
  • Clofibrate
  • Cushings Disease
  • Massive transfusions
  • Milk alkali syndrome
  • Vitamin C deficiency
  • Wilson’s disease
slide-18
SLIDE 18

6/23/2015 18

Fracture Prediction

  • BMD by DXA can be used to predict fracture

risk in stage 1‐3 CKD‐ (PMO studies) though risk may be higher in patients with intrinsic renal disease than age‐related reductions in GFR.

  • DXA is poor predictor to discriminate between

fractured and non‐fractured patients with stage 4‐5 CKD.

Miller PD et al Clin Rev in Bone and Min Metab 2012

Tibia for 2 Age and FN T‐Score Matched PMO Women

Control 64 yo Female T‐Score ‐ 2.7: Tibia PMO 62 yo CKD Pt T‐Score ‐2.5

Increased Tb Separation vs CKD pt Thicker Ct vs CKD pt Nickolas T et al CJASN 2010

slide-19
SLIDE 19

6/23/2015 19

Treatment of Osteoporosis in CKD

  • Stage 1‐3 CKD: Treatment does not differ as in

patients with PMO since clinical trials randomized patients down to “GFR” of 30 ml/min

  • Stage 4 CKD: Management dependent on

considerations for “off‐label” use:

  • Post‐hoc analysis show efficacy and safety

through 3 years of risedronate, alendronate and raloxifene and denosumab down to eGFR of 15 ml/min for 2‐3 years. Teriparatide to eGFR of 30.

  • Stage 5/5D CKD: No data‐ off‐label consideration

for fracturing patients , e.g. very high risk with established osteoporosis.

Bisphosphonates in CKD

slide-20
SLIDE 20

6/23/2015 20

US/European Labeling States:

Oral bisphosphonates are not recommended in patients with creatinine clearance < 30 (35) mL/min: (Stage 4‐5 CKD) Zoledronic acid contraindicated at GFR < 35 ml/min

FDA Label Rationale

  • 1. Randomization excluded patients with

elevated baseline serum creatinine (< 1.5/<2.4).

  • 2. eGFR exclusion criteria added by HORIZON

and FREEDOM.

  • 3. Renal (glomerulosclerosis or ATN) seen in case

reports with IV bisphosphonates.

  • 4. Bone retention probably greater with reduced

GFR since bisphosphonates are cleared by the kidney (both filtration and tubular secretion)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

6/23/2015 21 Mean Changes in Calculated Creatinine Clearance From Baseline Over Time Horizon: Zolendronate 5mg/yr vs Placebo

3862 3573 3284 2350 3620 3852 3615 3337 2419 3657

ZOL n = PBO n =

Mean (± SE) Change From Baseline in Calculated Creatinine Clearance (mL/ min) 12 24 36 Last Visit –15 –10 –5

ZOL 5 mg Placebo

Black D et al NEJM 2007

HORIZON‐PFT: Mean Serum Creatinine Levels From Baseline in Patients with Pre‐ to Post‐infusion Change of >0.5 mg/100 dL (Overall Safety Population): 7,714

n, number of patients affected from the overall safety population (N = 7,714) Boonen S, et al. Kidney Int. 2008; 74: 641–648

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

Baseline 9‐11 days after 1st infusion 2nd infusion (mo 12) 9‐11 days after 2nd infusion 3rd infusion (mo 24) 9‐11 days after 3rd infusion Month 36

ZOL 5 mg Placebo

Mean Serum Creatinine (mg/dL)

ZOL n = PBO n =

31 29 29 21 26 19 24 10 8 8 7 8 8 7

slide-22
SLIDE 22

6/23/2015 22

HORIZON‐PFT Extension Study: Mean Changes in Calculated

Creatinine Clearance From Baseline Comparable for ZOL vs Placebo (Safety Population)

  • 15
  • 10
  • 5

5 10 3 4 5 6 Mean (± SD) Change From Baseline in Calculated Creatinine Clearance (mL/ min) Z3P3 Z6 Years

616 569 505 452 616 581 530 469

ZOL n = PBO n =

Miller PD et al JCEM (in press)

FDA Zoledronic Acid Label Update: September, 2011

Perform a creatinine clearance (will accept eGFR by CG) before each dosing

slide-23
SLIDE 23

6/23/2015 23

Managing Renal Risk with ZOL

  • 1. Faster infusion time and greater risk of ARF suggests

renal damage might be due to the Cmax rather than the AUC.

  • 2. Slower infusion rate (30 minutes) suggested (opinion)

in Stage 3 CKD (eGFR 59‐30 ml/min).

  • 3. Patients should be well hydrated, off diuretics for

several days, and avoid NSAIDs for several days before infusion.

  • 4. Off‐label use in stage 4‐5 CKD in established
  • steoporosis ‐ suggest even slower infusion rate (60

minutes).

Miller PD. Cleve Clin J Med. 2009;76:715–723; Miller PD. Semin Dial. 2007;20:186–1904. Miller PD. Semin Nephrol. 2009;29:144–155. Miller PD. BONE 2011 Miller PD et al JBMR 2013

Vertebral Fracture Risk Reduction With Risedronate

Miller PD et al JBMR 2005

5 10 15 20 25 30 Mild Moderate Severe Control 5mg RIS

Percent (%) of Patients Baseline Renal Impairment 45% (31,57% P<0.001 32% (14,46%) P=0.001 56% (11,78%) P=0.021

slide-24
SLIDE 24

6/23/2015 24

Incidence of New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 36 by Baseline CrCl for Denosumab

Jamal S et JBMR 2012

Placebo (N=3906) DMAb (N=3902)

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Percent Incidence at Month 36

3691 3702 33 31 1309 1332 1952 1924 394 413

All 15 – 29 mL/min 30 – 59 mL/min 60 – 89 mL/min ≥ 90 mL/min

7.2 2.3 9.1 3.2 7.0 2.9 7.0 1.8 8.1 3.1 N1 N = number of randomized subjects. N1 = number of randomized subjects with an evaluation during the time period of interest. There were no subjects with a CrCl < 15 mL/min. *P < 0.05

* * * *

Denosumab 60 mg SQ Q 6 Mos in PMO

  • Did not alter serum creatinine concentration

from baseline over 3 years

  • Was not associated with any increase in

vascular calcification as assessed by AP and lateral x‐ray over 3 years within groups or between treated and placebo.

Egbuna O et al ASN 2010 (abstract)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

6/23/2015 25

Effect of Renal Function on Changes in PINP Concentrations with Teriparatide

Miller P, et al. Osteopor Int 2007

* P<0.05 from Placebo

PINP (3 months)

Median Change from Baseline [ng/ml] ((25th, 75th percentiles) 50 100 150 200

Placebo TPTD20 TPTD40

* * *

Normal (> 80 ml/min) Mild Impairment (50-79 ml/min) Moderate Impairment (30-49 ml/min)

* * *

Effect of Renal Function on Changes In BMD with Teriparatide

Lumbar Spine BMD (18 months)

Mean Percent Change in BMD + SE

  • 5

5 10 15 20

Normal (> 80 ml/min) Mild Impairment (50-79 ml/min) Moderate Impairment (30-49 ml/min)

* * * * * * Femoral Neck BMD (12 months)

  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4

Moderate Impairment (30-49 ml/min) Mild Impairment (50-79 ml/min) Normal (> 80 ml/min)

* * * *

Placebo TPTD20 TPTD40

* P<0.05 from Placebo

Miller P, et al. Osteopor Int 2007

slide-26
SLIDE 26

6/23/2015 26

In None of the PMO Clinical Trials

Did any patients in whom baseline PTH was measured have an elevated PTH:

Off Label Use of Anti‐Resorptive/Anabolic Agents is Considered in Stage 4 CKD

  • In very high risk patients who have osteoporotic fractures.
  • Whose mortality is high because of these fractures
  • And where in post‐hoc analysis bisphosphonates, raloxifene,

HT, denosumab, and teriparatide have been shown to reduce fracture risk as compared to placebo in patients with eGFR down to 15 ml/min (30ml/min for teriparatide)

Miller PD et al JBMR 2005 Sprague S et al Sem Dialysis 2007 Jamal S et al JBMR 2007 Miller PD Sem Dialysis 2008 Miller PD et al OI 2007 Miller PD Clin J Amer Soc Nephrol 2008 Delmas PD et al OI 2009 Miller PD Seminars Nephrology 2009

slide-27
SLIDE 27

6/23/2015 27

Management Decisions in Stage 5 CKD in Fracturing Patients

No Data Only Opinion

Bisphosphonate Use in Stage 5/5D CKD Patients:

Caution Still Advised

  • No data on benefit or harm in patients with stage 5

chronic kidney disease (GFR <15 mL/min). Use only in very specific circumstances: specific fragility fractures and clear‐cut diagnosis.

  • Bone retention over time with bisphosphonates in

patients with low GFR unknown

  • Effect of reducing bone turnover by any agent that

reduces turnover on cardiovascular disease unknown

  • In PMO observational trials, BP reduce all‐cause

mortality

Miller PD Seminars Dialysis 2007 Miller PD Seminars Nephrology 2009 Sambrook P et al Ost Int 2009

slide-28
SLIDE 28

6/23/2015 28

Conclusions

  • Stage 1-3 CKD: manage as you would for PMO or

idiopathic male osteoporosis.

  • Stage 4-5 CKD: screen DDX with BTM-especially

PTH and BSAP and serum phosphorus.

  • Fractured 4-5 CKD without biochemical evidence

suggesting OM or adynamic bone disease: treat on label with denosumab or off-label with bisphosphonates, or teriparatide.

  • Fractured 4-5 CKD that you don’t know the turnover,
  • r with a lower PTH/BSAP- consider treatment with

teriparatide first.

Thank you for your attention if questions nelane@ucdavis.edu