Presentation Content 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved - PDF document

Journée annuelle Clémentine Cornu de présentation des travaux des 16 th June, 2010 doctorants du ETZCR / C.CORNU / 16/06/2010 LGI2P EUROCOPTER UNCLASSIFIED 1 Presentation Content 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved ETZCR / C.CORNU / 16/06/2010 3. Conclusion and Outlook 2

1. Thesis question ETZCR / C.CORNU / 27/05/2010 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook Thesis statement How to deploy System Engineering processes in a multi cultural and multi sites industry, in a multi ‐ disciplinary context, ETZCR / C.CORNU / 16/06/2010 dealing with different factors like interoperability 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 4

Meaning of « to deploy » for this study • Definition – To put in place an organization and a way of working which meet the applicable standards within the company • Stages – Background analysis – Definition & implementation of the deployment process ETZCR / C.CORNU / 16/06/2010 – Definition of the deployment methodology – Definition of processes to deploy – Implementation of the deployment – Deployment control & Continuous improvement – Decommissioning of the deployment process 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 5 System Engineering (SE) Overview Companies’ needs: phasing out � Customer dissatisfaction � Origins of a product lack of profitability � Cost and deadlines overruns � … ETZCR / C.CORNU / 16/06/2010 Origins: lack of systems’ control • Needs not sufficiently expressed / listened • Lifecycle not considered entirely • Resources not available at the right time • Miscommunication • … 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 6

System Engineering Overview SE definition “ General methodological approach that includes all the appropriate activities to design, develop and test a system which both provides an economical and competitive solution to the needs of a customer and also satisfies all stakeholders . ” SE Stakes ETZCR / C.CORNU / 16/06/2010 • Better complexity control • Better match between products needs/quality • Better cost control • Better anticipation of problems and risks • Better respect of deadlines • Better multi ‐ disciplinary and multi ‐ actors cooperation • Shorter development time • Increasing the satisfaction of all stakeholders 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 7 System Engineering Overview End Needs product To qualify To qualify To analyze & define To define technical To analyze & define To define technical the system the system the need requirements the need requirements To verify To verify To verify & validate the integration To verify & validate the integration & optimize & optimize To assembly To assembly To design organic To design functionnal To design organic To design functionnal architecture architecture architecture architecture ETZCR / C.CORNU / 16/06/2010 To get To get the components the components System Engineering System integration To developp To manufacture To reuse To buy To developp To manufacture To reuse To buy Tailored from Realization : business engineering an AFIS pattern 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook

Interoperability Overview Interoperability definition “ Aptitude and capacity of the entities to interact in a harmonious and efficient way without having to call into question whole or part of their behavior or their structure” [Pingaud 2009] ETZCR / C.CORNU / 16/06/2010 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 9 Interoperability barriers & SE processes deployment Interoperability barriers business business business process process ETZCR / C.CORNU / 16/06/2010 process service INTEROPERABILITY service service data data data Tailored from EIF Framework [Chen 2006] 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 10

Eurocopter Interoperability interpretation Integration SE SE Customer Realization Other stakeholders Entreprise Certification authorities Dynamic environment SE processes SE processes ETZCR / C.CORNU / 16/06/2010 System of actors actors interest tools tools INTEROPERABILITY methods methods MATTERS … … SE process SE process SE process SE process 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 11 Eurocopter question How to get over the obstacles which prevent the SE deployment within the company ? Deployment difficulties Interoperability difficulties • What does the company have to How to make the elements to deploy ETZCR / C.CORNU / 16/06/2010 deploy ? be interoperable • How to practically deploy the SE – Between them process ? – With the actual organization within Eurocopter • How to make the design office staff adhere to the SE approach ? 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 12

Thesis expected deliverables Methodological guide Demonstrator • SE processes Workflow engine for the definitions/specifications deployment of 2 processes • SE process deployment rules • Requirements Management considering and improving its • Configuration Control interoperability ETZCR / C.CORNU / 16/06/2010 • Company interoperability maturity model 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 13 2. Current work achieved ETZCR / C.CORNU /16/06/2010 State of the Art in System Engineering applied to Avionics 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook

Comparison of System Engineering definitive texts Improvement of the analysis of [Sheard et al. 1998] • ISO/IEC TR 19760 • ISO/IEC TR 90005 Wide • ISO/IEC TR 24766 Scope • Découvrir et comprendre l'IS • MIL ‐ STD ‐ 499B • INCOSE SE Handbook • IEEE 1220 ETZCR / C.CORNU /16/06/2010 • NASA SE Handbook • EIA/IS 632 • BNAE RG.Aéro 000 77 • EIA 632 • BNAE RG.Aéro 000 40 • ISO/IEC 15288 Business specific • ECSS ‐ E ‐ ST ‐ 10C • Guide for ITS Updated 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 15 Comparison of System Engineering definitive texts Improvement of the analysis of [Sheard et al. 1998] System Engineering Global Relationships / Compatibility with other System engineering documents Project management System life cycle Project level System Life Cycle Stages Project reviews System engineering process by project phase • Scope System Engineering processes Relationships between System Engineering processes • Level of abstraction Recommendations/Tips for each System Engineering process System Engineering process System Engineering processes inputs • System Life Cycle ETZCR / C.CORNU /16/06/2010 level System Engineering processes outcomes • SEMP Guidance System Engineering processes actors System Engineering processes controls • Definition of system System Engineering processes enablers System Engineering Relationships between System Engineering processes activities • Definition of System processes activity level Detail information about System Engineering processes activities Engineering System Engineering processes activities task level Detail information about System Engineering processes activities tasks Indications about System Engineering plan System Engineering plan template Document level Indications about other documents Documents to provide for reviews 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 16

Comparison of System Engineering definitive texts Improvement of the analysis of [Sheard et al. 1998] SWOT Analysis S trengths W eaknesses Highlights the pros of Highlights the cons of each document each document ETZCR / C.CORNU /16/06/2010 O pportunities T hreats Highlights what may be Highlights what may useful for Eurocopter and be risky for Eurocopter thus create a competitive in each document advantage in each document 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 17 Comparison of System Engineering definitive texts Improvement of the analysis of [Sheard et al. 1998] SWOT Analysis ETZCR / C.CORNU /16/06/2010 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 18

Comparison of System Engineering definitive texts Relevancy of the SWOT analysis for the deployment S trengths W eaknesses to define, control & manage to define, control & manage the process the process ETZCR / C.CORNU /16/06/2010 O pportunities T hreats to develop the Eurocopter to adapt / to develop the abilities to create and take Eurocopter abilities to advantage of its adapt to these threats competitive advantage 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook 19 Comparison of System Engineering definitive texts SWOT analysis objectives – To identify those abilities (competitive advantage/adaptation) – To identify the derived requirements for the Eurocopter organization – To characterize how interoperability may allow to better meet these requirements or may influence compliance with these requirements? In the knowledge that – Dynamic & Multi ‐ disciplinary environment ETZCR / C.CORNU /16/06/2010 – Open processes (new tools, …) Study continuation – Definition of SE process deployment rules and requirements – Definition of a maturity model for each organization level concerned by the deployment 1. Thesis question 2. Current work achieved 3. Conclusion & Outlook