Disclosures Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale: Not the - - PDF document

disclosures
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Disclosures Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale: Not the - - PDF document

10/1/16 Disclosures Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale: Not the Same Thing No financial disclosures Jared Oyama, MD Off-label device use will be discussed Interventional Cardiology The Queens Medical Center Assistant


slide-1
SLIDE 1

10/1/16 1

Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale: Not the Same Thing

Jared Oyama, MD

Interventional Cardiology The Queen’s Medical Center Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine University of Hawaii John A Burns School of Medicine

Disclosures

— No financial disclosures — Off-label device use will be discussed

Overview

— Development of the interatrial septum — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale

Overview

— Development of the interatrial septum — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale

slide-2
SLIDE 2

10/1/16 2

Septal Development

Adapted from Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:148-60

Septal Development

Adapted from Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:148-60

Septal Development

OS OS

OP OP

Adapted from Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:148-60

slide-3
SLIDE 3

10/1/16 3

Septal Development

Adapted from Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:148-60

SS SS

Septal Development

Adapted from Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:148-60 J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:910-58 J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:910-58

slide-4
SLIDE 4

10/1/16 4

Overview

— Development of the interatrial septum — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale

Consequences

— Right-sided chamber enlargement and HF — Atrial arrhythmias — Elevation in pulmonary pressures

Overview

— Development of the interatrial septum — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale

slide-5
SLIDE 5

10/1/16 5

PFO-Associated Conditions

— Paradoxical embolism including

cryptogenic stroke

— Platypnea/orthodeoxia — Decompression sickness — Migraines

Overview

— Development of the interatrial septum — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale

slide-6
SLIDE 6

10/1/16 6

Transthoracic Echocardiography

— Good for:

  • Gross visualization of defect
  • Doppler evaluation of flow
  • Evaluation of right-to-left shunt
  • Evaluation of chamber sizes
  • Estimation of pulmonary pressures
  • Assessment of device stability post-procedure

Transthoracic Echocardiography

— Not adequate for:

  • Accurate assessment of dimensions
  • Determining if multiple defects present
  • Presence/absence of adequate rims
  • Intraprocedural guidance
slide-7
SLIDE 7

10/1/16 7 Transesophageal Echocardiography

— Good for:

  • Detailed visualization of defect

– Dimensions, number of defects, fenestrations – Adequacy of rims

  • Doppler evaluation of flow
  • Evaluation of right-to-left shunt
  • Evaluation of chamber sizes
  • Intraprocedural guidance

J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:910-58

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10/1/16 8

J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2010;3:749-60 Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75:570-77

slide-9
SLIDE 9

10/1/16 9

Intracardiac Echocardiography

— Good for:

  • Intraprocedural guidance
  • Reasonable visualization of defect

– Fewer views compared to TEE

  • Doppler evaluation of flow
  • Evaluation of right-to-left shunt
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10/1/16 10

Overview

— Development of the interatrial septum — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale

  • Circulation. 2008;118:2395-2451

Indications for Closure

— Class I

  • Right sided chamber enlargement with or

without symptoms

— Class IIa

  • Paradoxical embolism
  • Orthodeoxia-platypnea
slide-11
SLIDE 11

10/1/16 11

Percutaneous Closure

— Only for secundum ASDs — Need TEE evaluation of size and rims — Most closures can be performed with

sedation and ICE guidance

Devices Available

Amplatzer Septal Occluder

Devices Available

Gore Cardioform Septal Occluder

Technique

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10/1/16 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

10/1/16 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

10/1/16 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

10/1/16 15

Overview

— Development of the interatrial septum — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale

PFO Closure

— No FDA approved device for PFO closure — Continues to be investigated — Remains a contentious issue

Percutaneous Closure

— PFO closure is currently off label

slide-16
SLIDE 16

10/1/16 16

Devices Being Used

Amplatzer Cribriform Septal Occluder

Devices Being Used

Gore Cardioform Septal Occluder

slide-17
SLIDE 17

10/1/16 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

10/1/16 18 PFO Closure in Cryptogenic Stroke

— CLOSURE I (NEJM 2012)

  • 909 patients, STARFlex vs ASA or OAC
  • Composite endpoint:

– Stroke/TIA at 2 years – 30 day mortality – Neurologic mortality past 30 days

  • No significant difference

PFO Closure in Cryptogenic Stroke

— PC Trial (NEJM 2013)

  • 414 patients, Amplatzer vs medical therapy
  • Composite endpoint:

– Death – Nonfatal stroke – TIA – Peripheral embolism

  • No significant difference
slide-19
SLIDE 19

10/1/16 19 PFO Closure in Cryptogenic Stroke

— RESPECT Trial (NEJM 2013)

  • 980 patients, Amplatzer vs medical therapy
  • Composite endpoint:

– Recurrent nonfatal ischemic stroke – Fatal ischemic stroke – Early death

  • No significant difference in intention to treat
  • However, as-treated analysis favored closure
  • Stroke. 2014;45:2160-2236
  • Stroke. 2014;45:2160-2236
  • Stroke. 2014;45:2160-2236
slide-20
SLIDE 20

10/1/16 20

  • Stroke. 2014;45:2160-2236

HOWEVER…

— Device safety: 15 to 1 yes — Effectiveness: 9 to 7 yes — Benefits outweigh risks: 11 to 5 yes

slide-21
SLIDE 21

10/1/16 21

Conclusion

— Embryology is boring but important in

understanding the interatrial septum

— Echocardiographic imaging is critical to

evaluation of ASD and PFO

— Percutaneous closure of secundum ASDs

is first line therapy in most cases

— Percutaneous closure of PFOs remains

controversial but may be gaining ground

Thank You!