disclosures
play

Disclosures Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale: Not the - PDF document

10/1/16 Disclosures Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale: Not the Same Thing No financial disclosures Jared Oyama, MD Off-label device use will be discussed Interventional Cardiology The Queens Medical Center Assistant


  1. 10/1/16 Disclosures Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale: Not the Same Thing — No financial disclosures Jared Oyama, MD — Off-label device use will be discussed Interventional Cardiology The Queen’s Medical Center Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine University of Hawaii John A Burns School of Medicine Overview Overview — Development of the interatrial septum — Development of the interatrial septum — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale — Treatment of patent foramen ovale 1

  2. 10/1/16 Septal Development Adapted from Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:148-60 Septal Development Septal Development OS OS OP OP Adapted from Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:148-60 Adapted from Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:148-60 2

  3. 10/1/16 Septal Development Septal Development SS SS Adapted from Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:148-60 Adapted from Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:148-60 J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:910-58 J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:910-58 3

  4. 10/1/16 Overview — Development of the interatrial septum — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale Consequences Overview — Right-sided chamber enlargement and HF — Development of the interatrial septum — Atrial arrhythmias — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Elevation in pulmonary pressures — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale 4

  5. 10/1/16 PFO-Associated Conditions — Paradoxical embolism including cryptogenic stroke — Platypnea/orthodeoxia — Decompression sickness — Migraines Overview — Development of the interatrial septum — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale 5

  6. 10/1/16 Transthoracic Echocardiography Transthoracic Echocardiography — Good for: — Not adequate for: ◦ Gross visualization of defect ◦ Accurate assessment of dimensions ◦ Doppler evaluation of flow ◦ Determining if multiple defects present ◦ Evaluation of right-to-left shunt ◦ Presence/absence of adequate rims ◦ Evaluation of chamber sizes ◦ Intraprocedural guidance ◦ Estimation of pulmonary pressures ◦ Assessment of device stability post-procedure 6

  7. 10/1/16 Transesophageal Echocardiography — Good for: ◦ Detailed visualization of defect – Dimensions, number of defects, fenestrations – Adequacy of rims ◦ Doppler evaluation of flow ◦ Evaluation of right-to-left shunt ◦ Evaluation of chamber sizes ◦ Intraprocedural guidance J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:910-58 7

  8. 10/1/16 J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2010;3:749-60 Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75:570-77 8

  9. 10/1/16 Intracardiac Echocardiography — Good for: ◦ Intraprocedural guidance ◦ Reasonable visualization of defect – Fewer views compared to TEE ◦ Doppler evaluation of flow ◦ Evaluation of right-to-left shunt 9

  10. 10/1/16 Overview — Development of the interatrial septum — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale Indications for Closure — Class I ◦ Right sided chamber enlargement with or without symptoms — Class IIa ◦ Paradoxical embolism ◦ Orthodeoxia-platypnea Circulation. 2008;118:2395-2451 10

  11. 10/1/16 Percutaneous Closure Devices Available — Only for secundum ASDs Amplatzer Septal Occluder — Need TEE evaluation of size and rims — Most closures can be performed with sedation and ICE guidance Devices Available Technique Gore Cardioform Septal Occluder 11

  12. 10/1/16 12

  13. 10/1/16 13

  14. 10/1/16 14

  15. 10/1/16 Overview — Development of the interatrial septum — Pathophysiology in atrial septal defect — Pathophysiology in patent foramen ovale — Imaging the interatrial septum — Treatment of atrial septal defect — Treatment of patent foramen ovale PFO Closure Percutaneous Closure — No FDA approved device for PFO closure — PFO closure is currently off label — Continues to be investigated — Remains a contentious issue 15

  16. 10/1/16 Devices Being Used Devices Being Used Amplatzer Cribriform Septal Occluder Gore Cardioform Septal Occluder 16

  17. 10/1/16 17

  18. 10/1/16 PFO Closure in Cryptogenic Stroke PFO Closure in Cryptogenic Stroke — CLOSURE I (NEJM 2012) — PC Trial (NEJM 2013) ◦ 909 patients, STARFlex vs ASA or OAC ◦ 414 patients, Amplatzer vs medical therapy ◦ Composite endpoint: ◦ Composite endpoint: – Stroke/TIA at 2 years – Death – 30 day mortality – Nonfatal stroke – Neurologic mortality past 30 days – TIA ◦ No significant difference – Peripheral embolism ◦ No significant difference 18

  19. 10/1/16 PFO Closure in Cryptogenic Stroke — RESPECT Trial (NEJM 2013) ◦ 980 patients, Amplatzer vs medical therapy ◦ Composite endpoint: – Recurrent nonfatal ischemic stroke – Fatal ischemic stroke – Early death ◦ No significant difference in intention to treat ◦ However, as-treated analysis favored closure Stroke. 2014;45:2160-2236 Stroke. 2014;45:2160-2236 Stroke. 2014;45:2160-2236 19

  20. 10/1/16 HOWEVER… Stroke. 2014;45:2160-2236 — Device safety: 15 to 1 yes — Effectiveness: 9 to 7 yes — Benefits outweigh risks: 11 to 5 yes 20

  21. 10/1/16 Conclusion Thank You! — Embryology is boring but important in understanding the interatrial septum — Echocardiographic imaging is critical to evaluation of ASD and PFO — Percutaneous closure of secundum ASDs is first line therapy in most cases — Percutaneous closure of PFOs remains controversial but may be gaining ground 21

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend