Direct Service Purchase (DSP) Restructure Vendor Council Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

direct service purchase dsp restructure
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Direct Service Purchase (DSP) Restructure Vendor Council Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Direct Service Purchase (DSP) Restructure Vendor Council Meeting March 30, 2011 Current DSP model Vendors sign bid agreement to participate Agree to rate and service area Referrals or authorizations not guaranteed More than 200


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Direct Service Purchase (DSP) Restructure

Vendor Council Meeting March 30, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Current DSP model

2

 Vendors sign bid agreement to participate

 Agree to rate and service area  Referrals or authorizations not guaranteed

 More than 200 vendors  Services authorized for care management clients

 mostly MI-Choice waiver

 1201 Medicaid Waiver vs. 434 Community care management in 2010

 13,226 authorized services in 2010; nearly 8000 in FY 2011

(Oct – March)

 Majority of vendors that apply are accepted

slide-3
SLIDE 3

DSP Services

3

 Adult Day Health Services  Chore  Community Living Program

Services (non-Medicaid)

 Community Living Supports

(MI-Choice)

 Counseling  Environmental Accessibility

Adaptations

 Fiscal Intermediary  Home Delivered Meals  Homemaking  Medication Management  Nursing Facility Transition  Personal Care  Personal Emergency

Response Systems

 Private Duty Nursing  Residential Services  Respite Services  Specialized Medical Equipment

& Supplies

 Transportation  Unmet Needs

Italicized also contracted services

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why change the DSP?

4

 Improve Efficiency and Effectiveness

 High quantity of vendors exceeds actual need for service,

increases administrative costs

 Some providers high quality – others low  Vendors still do not actively serve some areas of region

 Improve ROI for vendors

 Many vendors currently get little to no referrals  T

echnology and insurance requirements costs exceed business

  • pportunities

 Smaller pool = potential increase in number of referrals

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why change the DSP?

5

 Align vendors with AAA 1-B goals & standards

 AAA 1-B Strategic Plan  CARF Accreditation (preliminary exploration)

 Commission on the Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities  Signifies a higher standard of quality  Pursuing two standards: Aging Service Network, Home & Community

Services  Focus on Quality

 Difficult to monitor quality (i.e. long periods between

assessments, limited performance monitoring)

 Need to improve satisfaction, person-centeredness, self

determination of participants

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Person Centered Service Delivery

6

 Focus on Quality of Life and participant choice

 Each participant knows their own needs best  Service delivery with more open communication between

workers and participants

 Care Managers still support the participant to meet their

goals

 Improve Participant outcomes and satisfaction

 Community Living Service allows personalized service to be

defined by participant

 Greater flexibility in delivery of service hours through Self

Determination

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Satisfaction & Quality review

7

 Participant satisfaction results (2009-2010 survey)

 Recommend personal care services to family or friend?

>20% = No, Maybe or Unsure

 Does the worker arrive late? ~13%

Yes

 Agency notifies me if worker will be late or can’t come?

>16% = No

 State quality standards

 Timeliness of first service delivery  Variance between planned and delivered service  Communicating status changes, inpatient stays, other  Critical Incident reporting

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Restructuring Plan

8

 Approval from Board of Directors in Feb 2011  Request for Proposals (RFP) to participate in DSP pool

 Purchase agreement will define full serving area and bid rates  DSP will not guarantee a number of clients/units  3 year agreement cycle

 Clients receiving services from vendors not chosen will be

transitioned to new vendors: Begin Process Summer 2012

 Exceptions may be made for SD clients

 Inclusive development process: various AAA 1-B staff including

care managers; vendor feedback, participant feedback

 Not all DSP services included in RFP process

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Proposed services included in RFP

9

 Adult Day Health Services  Counseling  Homemaking  Medication Management  Personal Care  PERS  Private Duty Nursing  Respite services

*Services not included will continue to do business through our current bid agreement process

 Exception criteria may apply for services in assisted settings

**Final list to be determined

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Selection Process

10

 Open to current pool & new vendors  Exact number of vendors accepted not yet know

 Estimating 40-50

 Will set a specific application deadline  Applications reviewed by AAA 1-B Application Review

Committee (ARC)

 Consists of board members, advisory council members

 Appeal process for those not selected

 Applications will be kept on file if a selected agency drops out

  • r is removed from pool

 Weighted rating system/selection criteria…

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Selection criteria

11

Potential criteria – may expand or change

 In business 3+ years  Accreditations (where appropriate)  Service flexibility i.e. 24 hour service, intermittent or short

time periods (1 hour)

 Bilingual workers  Will work with AWC or SD clients  Provide service in hard to serve areas

 May need to designate/mandate service area

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Selection Criteria cont.

12

 No subcontracting of direct service workers  Demonstrate internal satisfaction/quality assurance procedures  Private pay process (for non Mi-Choice participants)  Hire CNA’s  Demonstrate excellent training protocols  Non-profit status priority  CARF criteria adherence, i.e.:

 Risk management plan  Demonstrate collaboration with participant family/support system  Demonstrate ability to respond to diversity of participants

 i.e. cultural competency training

 Demonstrate vendor alliance with AAA 1-B mission

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Timeline

13

Issue RFP October Applications Due December 1 Select Candidates January/Feb Notify selected vendors March Vendor Appeals April Client transitions May- September Implement RFP October

FY 2011 FY 2012

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Next steps

14

 Vendor feedback

 1st opportunity today  Focus group in May

 Participant feedback in June  Develop & finalize selection criteria  Develop RFP materials

 Approval from Office of Services to the Aging & AAA 1-B

Board of Directors

 Public review & comment

 AAA 1-B website

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Questions/Feedback

15

Please state your name and agency when you ask a question

  • r comment.