Decomposing Concepts with Frames Wiebke Petersen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

decomposing concepts with frames
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Decomposing Concepts with Frames Wiebke Petersen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook Decomposing Concepts with Frames Wiebke Petersen Heinrich-Heine-Universit at D usseldorf Research group on Functional Concepts and Frames


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

Decomposing Concepts with Frames

Wiebke Petersen

Heinrich-Heine-Universit¨ at D¨ usseldorf Research group on “Functional Concepts and Frames” www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/˜petersen/

Riga 2006

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

  • utline

1

Introduction

2

Concept Classes

3

Frames

4

Outlook

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

my hypotheses

1

Concepts are complex cognitive structures

2

Concepts can be decomposed in frames

3

Frames of sortal concepts decompose them into functional concepts

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

How do frames look like?

charly judy adult juvenile male female jungle

MOTHER HABITAT MATURITY SEX SEX H A B I T A T MATURITY Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

Why am I here? International Symposium of Cognition, Logic and Communication Oswald K¨ ulpe Aspects of a Qualitative Science

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

What I found in K¨ ulpe’s work

Experimental method of “Kundgabe” Concentration on higher mental processes

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

Oswald K¨ ulpe: Kundgabe

“Die Versuchspersonen begannen in der Sprache des Lebens zu reden und den Vorstellungen nur eine untergeordnete Bedeutung f¨ ur ihre Innenwelt

  • beizulegen. Sie wußten und dachten, urteilten und

verstanden, ergriffen den Sinn und deuteten die Zusammenh¨ ange, ohne eine wirkliche Unterst¨ utzung durch gelgentlich auftauchende Versinnlichungen dabei zu erhalten.” (K¨ ulpe 1912)

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

Barsalou 1999: Perceptual Symbol Systems

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

Oswald K¨ ulpe: higher mental processes

“Es ist dem Denken in der fr¨ uheren Psychologie meist nicht die gen¨ ugende Beachtung geschenkt worden. [. . . ] Von der naturwissenschaftlichen Erfahrung her waren sie [die experimentellen Psychologen] auf Sinnesreize und Empfindungen, auf Nachbilder, Kontrasterscheinungen und phantastische Ver¨ anderungen der Wirklichkeit eingerichtet. Was solchen Charakter nicht an sich trug, schien einfach nicht vorhanden zu sein.” (K¨ ulpe 1912)

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

higher mental processes

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

higher mental processes

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

higher mental processes

Frame Feature List

charly judy adult juvenile male female jungle

M O T H E R H A B I T A T M A T U R I T Y S E X S E X HABITAT MATURITY

(juvenile, male, jungle inhabitant)

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

concept names used in the Charly-frame

charly judy adult juvenile male female jungle

MOTHER HABITAT MATURITY SEX SEX H A B I T A T MATURITY Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

classifying concepts

no unique reference unique reference arity:1 ape, chimpanzee, jungle Charly, Judy, sun, pope arity:>1 brother, argument, entrance mother, age, sex, spouse

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

classifying concepts

no unique reference unique reference arity:1 ape, chimpanzee, jungle Charly, Judy, sun, pope arity:>1 brother, argument, entrance mother, age, sex, spouse relational

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

classifying concepts

no unique reference unique reference arity:1 ape, chimpanzee, jungle Charly, Judy, sun, pope arity:>1 brother, argument, entrance mother, age, sex, spouse relational identificational

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

4 concept classes (L¨

  • bner)

no unique reference unique reference arity:1 SC: sortal concept IC: individual concept arity:>1 RC: (proper) relational concept FC: functional concept relational identificational

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

frames

charly judy adult juvenile male female jungle

M O T H E R H A B I T A T MATURITY S E X SEX HABITAT MATURITY

Definition (Frame) Frames are connected, directed graphs with

  • ne central / referential node

nodes labeled with types edges labeled with attributes no node with two equally labeled outgoing edges

  • ne root node

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

frames of functional concepts

frame ‘person’ (with attribute ‘mother’) person mother

MOTHER

λx : person(x) ∧ (∃y : mother(y) ∧ MOTHER(x) = y) frame ‘mother’ person mother

M O T H E R

λy : mother(y) ∧ (∃x : person(x) ∧ MOTHER(x) = y)

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

two ways of representing frames

Charly-frame represented as graph Charly-frame represented as AVM

charly judy adult juvenile male female jungle

MOTHER HABITAT MATURITY S E X SEX H A B I T A T MATURITY

        

MOTHER :

 

HABITAT : 1 SEX :

female

MATURITY : adult

 

judy

HABITAT : 1 jungle MATURITY : juvenile SEX :

male         

charly

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

types are organized in type signatures

⊤ ape habitat: habitat sex: sex gorilla habitat: jungle sex male female habitat jungle desert charly sex: male

  • HABITAT : habitat

SEX :

sex

  • ape

  • HABITAT : jungle

SEX :

sex

  • gorilla

  • HABITAT : jungle

SEX :

male

  • gorilla

Notice the strange duplication of the attributes!

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

excluding bad attributes

  • HEIGHT :

6 feet

HIT : mary

  • john

Wood’s Linguistic Test Y is a value of the attribute A of X if we can say that Y is a A of X (or the A of X).

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

attributes in frames

Barsalou, 1992 “I define an attribute as a concept that describes an aspect of at least some category member.” “Values are subordinate concepts of an attribute.” Guarino, 1992: Concepts, attributes and arbitrary relations “We define attributes as concepts having an associate relational interpretation, allowing them to act as conceptual components as well as concepts on their own.”

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

interpretation of functional concepts

denotational interpretation A functional concept denotes a set of entities: δ : R → 2U δ(mother) = {m | m is the mother of someone} relational interpretation A functional concept has also a relational interpretation: ̺ : R → 2U×U ̺(mother) = {(p, m) | m is the mother of p} consistency postulate (Guarino, 1992) Any value of an relationally interpreted functional concept is also an instance

  • f the denotation of that concept.

If (p, m) ∈ ̺(mother), then m ∈ δ(mother).

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

example

example family Ann ⊗ Tom Sue Bob ⊗ Liz Tim Pam Max ‘mother’ denotational δ(mother) = {Ann, Liz} ‘mother’ relational (‘mother of’) Sue Ann Bob Ann Tim Liz Pam Liz Max Liz

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

attributes in frames

Thesis: Attributes in frames are relationally interpreted functional concepts! attributes are not frames themselves attributes are unstructured each attribute has an associated frame the possible values of an attribute are subconcepts of the denotationally interpreted functional concept frame functional concept (FC2) attribute denotational r e l a t i

  • n

a l

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

attributes in frames

mother-frame person mother

M O T H E R

‘mother’ mother-attribute

MOTHER : δ(person) → δ(mother)

denotational r e l a t i

  • n

a l

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

first ideas about a frame-based logic

“Charly is an chimpanzee” modeled in PL1: Chimp(c) true iff c ∈ Chimp, i.e. ‘Charly’ ∈ {x|x is an chimpanzee} “Charly is an chimpanzee” modeled with Frames:

charly judy adult juvenile male female jungle

MOTHER HABITAT MATURITY S E X SEX H A B I T A T M A T U R I T Y

chimpanzee mother maturity sex jungle

MOTHER HABITAT MATURITY SEX

true iff the unification of the two frames succeeds, i.e. there exists a unique most general frame which subsumes both frames

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

reference shifting

charly judy adult juvenile male female jungle

MOTHER HABITAT MATURITY SEX SEX H A B I T A T MATURITY Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

advertisement

Conference on Concept Types and Frames in Language, Cognition, and Science D¨ usseldorf, August 20-22, 2007 www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/CFT

Invited speakers: Lawrence W. Barsalou Friedemann Pulvermueller Peter Gaerdenfors Barbara Partee Xiang Chen Nicola Guarino William McGregor Jeff Pelletier Charles Fillmore Peter Simons Vladimir Borschev Submission deadline: March 1st 2007

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

literature

Barsalou (1992) Frames, Concepts, and Conceptual Fields. In Lehrer and Kittay (eds.): Frames, Fields, and Contrasts. Guarino (1992) Concepts, attributes and arbitrary relations — some linguistic and ontological criteria for structuring knowledge bases. Data Knowl. Eng. 8, 249-261 L¨

  • bner (2005) FFF — Forschergruppe “Funktionalbegriffe und

Frames”, DFG-Antrag. Petersen & Werning (submitted) Conceptual Fingerprints: Lexical Decomposition by Means of Frames.

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Outline Introduction Concept Classes Frames Outlook

the binding problem

red corpus round lolly green handle long

COLOR S H A P E COLOR SHAPE CORPUS HANDLE

Concept Frames Wiebke Petersen