Data Collection Process Webinar March 1, 2018 Katie Dively and Jay - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

data collection process
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Data Collection Process Webinar March 1, 2018 Katie Dively and Jay - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oregon Problem Gambling Resource Positive Culture Framework Data Collection Process Webinar March 1, 2018 Katie Dively and Jay Otto Centers Purpose We are an interdisciplinary center serving communities and organizations through


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Webinar

March 1, 2018 Katie Dively and Jay Otto

Oregon Problem Gambling Resource

Positive Culture Framework Data Collection Process

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Center’s Purpose

We are an interdisciplinary center serving communities and

  • rganizations through research,

training and guidance to cultivate healthy and safe cultures.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Agenda

  • Core questions we want to answer
  • Various constructs
  • Behavioral model
  • Review methodology
  • Questions
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Positive Culture Framework

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Step 2. Assess Culture

Context

  • 2.6% of Oregon adults experience moderate or severe problems with

gambling (83,800 people)

  • 5.4% of Oregon adults experience low level problems with gambling

(174,150 people)

  • In 2016, 134 families / significant others got support through OPGR

programs

  • About 1,100 gamblers enrolled in publicly funded problem gambling

treatment programs

– does not include those funded with private insurance

Source: Gambling & Problem Gaming in Oregon, Oregon Council on Problem Gambling

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Step 2. Assess Culture

Identify cultural factors that we want to grow in order to increase use of Oregon Problem Gambling Resources.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Core Questions

  • 1. How concerned are people about problem gambling

behaviors?

  • 2. To what degree do people have perceived stigma about

problem gambling?

a) And how does this correlate with their beliefs and behaviors?

  • 3. Are people in situations to intervene with a potential

problem gambler?

a) If so, how often do people in this situation actually intervene?

  • 4. What are the attitudes and beliefs that predict accessing

OPGR?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Concern for Problem Gambling Behaviors

Use several vignettes (i.e., short stories)

  • Written based on DSM Criteria
  • Independently scored by OPGR counselors
  • For each vignette, ask:
  • How concerning is Jay’s gambling behavior?
  • How concerned would you be if Jay was a close friend or

family member?

  • Agree or disagree: Something should be done to address Jay’s

gambling behavior?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Perceived Stigma about PG

Use the Problem Gambling Perceived Stigma Scale

– Asks to what degree the respondent agrees with 13 statements about what “most people” think about problem gamblers. Example: “Most people think problem gamblers are liars.”

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Values Attitudes & Beliefs Willingness & Intention Behavior

Simplified Behavioral Model

(represents one individual)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Behavioral Model

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Behavior

Visiting the OPGR website, texting OPGR, and calling OPGR either for

  • Themselves or for
  • Someone whom they are concerned about
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Willingness / Intention

Willingness to visit the OPGR website, text OPGR, or call OPGR for

a) yourself b) family member, partner, or spouse c) close friend d) acquaintance or co-worker

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Attitude

Attitude about contacting OPGR if they were concerned about someone else’s gambling behaviors.

  • Use 10 pairs of words like Useful vs. Useless

Also explore behavioral beliefs and assumptions

(24 questions)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Prototypical Image

How respondents “feel” about the typical person who would contact OPGR if they were concerned about someone else’s gambling behaviors

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Perceived Norms

(Injunctive)

Perception as to whether other people would

  • think it was acceptable
  • would oppose or support
  • would approve or disapprove
  • f contacting OPGR

Also explore normative beliefs

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Perceived Norms

(Descriptive)

Perception as to whether other people would typically contact OPGR if they were concerned about someone

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Perceived Control

Perception as to whether people feel

  • They are capable of contacting OPGR;
  • How easy or difficult it is; and
  • How comfortable they are.

Also explore control beliefs and knowledge

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Demographics

  • Region of Oregon

– North Coast, Central Coast, South Coast, Portland Metro Area, Willamette Valley, Columbia River Gorge / Basin, Southern Oregon, Central Oregon, Eastern Oregon

  • Age
  • Sex
  • Education attainment
  • Race
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Methodology

Development

  • Three pilot tests with a convenience sample of

100 adults in Oregon recruited online

Implementation

  • Three hundred respondents recruited online
  • Age 18+ who live in Oregon
  • Stratify by age, sex, geography
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Questions / Comments