Cupertino Union School District Town Hall 1
introductions | our team Jim Kisel Walter Estay Lindsay Hayward Principal Project Manager Associate Director of School Planning Architecture Project Designer Architecture Architecture Helen Pierce Andrea Pippin Maria Madrigal Associate Educational Facilities Planner Project Architect Design Director Architecture Architecture Architecture 2
agenda | town hall Process Overview 5 minutes W hy Are We Here Today? 5 minutes School Site Council (SSC) Role W hy do a Facilities Master Plan? 5 minutes Defining Success W hat Have We Learned? 1 5 minutes Facilities Assessments Stakeholder Findings Educational Vision 1 5 minutes Review Conceptual Draft Master Plan Diagrams 1 .5 hours SSC Small Groups 3
cusd by the numbers 1 6,40 0 students 1 1 9 9 elementary schools 1 k-8 school 5 middle schools 1 district support site Town Hall Purpose: building o o n g o o d w wo rk do ne-to to -date: To educate the Cupertino Union School District • Parcel Tax: Measure A (20 1 4) community of the Facility Master Planning process to - • Facilities Bond: Measure H (20 1 2) date, provide the school sites with their draft proposed master plan diagrams, and begin the stakeholder input process on these diagrams. 4 4
Process Overview 5 5
process overview | timeline Activities To-Date Demographics Review Educational An analysis o f the Vision and Goals Plan-the-Plan 9 | May 20 1 future po tential Aspirational design guidelines enro llments at each based o n district go als and the scho o l and district- Strategic Plan. The translation Data Collection wide, aligned with 9 | Summer 20 1 o f pro gram go als into the built enro llment targets. environment. M+O Focus Groups Data Transfer Collaboration 9 | Facility Assessments Fall 20 1 • Community Stakeho lders • Cost Estimates District Staff and Teachers Principal Survey + Interview • Parents and Students and Prioritization • Site Visits Communicate Needs • Campus Master Plan Concepts • Build Suppo rt fo r District Goals 9 | Fall 20 1 Educational Visioning Educational Programs Focus Group Instructional Directors Charrette Financial Final Facilities Analysis Facilities Master Plan Spring 20 20 | Condition Fall 20 1 9 Community Engagement Aligning the master Recommendations Assessments plan diagrams with Student Survey available and Do cumentation o f the po tential funding. existing facilities invo lving Teacher Survey interviews o f district Parent + Community Survey perso nnel and principals, and o n-site o bservatio ns. Input on Existing Plans Reviewed fo r functio nality and condition. Community Outreach 6
W hy Are We Here Today? School Site Committee Role 7 7
school site committee | suggested participants Elementary School K-8 & Middle School 4-5 members, min 7-8 members, min Principal Principal (2) Teachers (Lower & Upper Primary Grades) (4) Teachers (1 ) Classified Staff One from each of the following areas: • Primary Grades Teaching Staff (K-8) (2) Parent / PTO / HSC • Language Arts/ Social Sciences/ Math • Science • Electives (1 ) Classified Staff (2) Parent / PTO / HSC (1 ) Student 8
school site committee | responsibilities 0 th interact with SSC and other site stakeholders between now and February 1 outreach to school site council & parents as appropriate verify accuracy of existing site plan diagram confirm site needs in proposed draft master plan fill out questionnaire provided and list 3 highest priorities sign up for an appointment during February 10 th 14 th 9
W hy Do A Facilities Master Plan? Defining Success 1 1 0 0
defining success | FMPC goals and considerations (draft) create sustainable, eco-friendly, energy-efficient schools that are built to last meet a standard level of basic needs repairs, roofing, plumbing/ restrooms, ada accessibility, safety kid-focused design that supports the whole child: community gathering space, sensory rooms; safe, inviting, and welcoming environments; gender equity design for flexibility / mobility spaces that can grow/ shrink based on group size, varied/ flexible furniture options create an equity among schools that anticipates future needs modern technology that allows for flexibility foster school community indoor food service, whole- diversity of space: outdoor spaces for exercise / play options, shade; provide mobility throughout school 1 1
W hat Have We Learned? Assessments 1 1 2 2
info gathered | assessments Purpose • To determine the approximate scope of work necessary to renovate and/or add instructional and support spaces to the level specified in the Educational Specifications developed as part of the Facilities Master Plan process. • To gain an understanding of how the site operates and where there are deficiencies. Process • Principal survey + follow-up interview • LPA site walks with Principal for use and functionality • EMG site walks for facility condition and repair needs • QC process - District review and verification 1 3
info gathered | assessments Good Work Done To-Date Measure H Bond Program • Modernization • Exterior Painting • Roof Repair/ Replacement • Kindergarten Play Yards • Site Utility Improvements • Data Infrastructure Upgrades • Technology Upgrades • New Classroom Buildings 1 1 4 4
info gathered | assessments Common Themes • original construction between 1 947 and 1 975 • continue modernization and technology upgrade across all sites • new furniture wanted to promote/ support flexibility • hardcourts need to be slurry-coated, sealed, and re-striped at all sites • need sewer re-piping within the buildings • need electrical capacity upgrades to support increased technology needs • want indoor serving areas for food service • add parking / lengthen drop-off lanes and create safe site access for students • develop purpose-built spaces for student support programs (counselors, therapists, etc), including sensory and cool-down spaces 1 5
W hat Have We Learned? Stakeholder Engagement 1 1 6 6
info gathered | stakeholder engagement Most Common Priorities • Food Service related to food access and indoor / covered student dining • Restroom improvements that address plumbing issues and restroom availability • Safety and security related to site access points • Removal of portable / temporary classrooms and construction of permanent buildings 6,329 820 1,077 25 principals + (grades 4-8) + + students teachers parents + + staff community = 8,251 total responses 1 7
W hat Have We Learned? Educational Vision 1 1 8 8
info gathered | educational vision Purpose • To establish district standards for building design. Incorporates size, furniture styles, equipment, adjacencies, and finish types, this document is a tool for creating equity and parity across all sites. Process 4 th | Focus Group meeting with Allison Liner, October 1 Associate Superintendent of Educational Services st | October 21 Charrette Directors of Instructional Leadership and Intervention 1 9
info gathered | educational vision Themes Social-Emotional Support Collaboration & Flexibility support hands-on, student-led learning with spaces and furniture that allow students and teachers to connect with one another Celebrate School Community Decentralization provide easy access at all times to shared student and teacher resources and technologies at each site Sustainability create environments that are socially, economically, and environmentally responsible 20
info gathered | educational vision Space Types Brief Description 21
W hat Have We Learned? Financial Analysis (next steps) 22 22
info gathered | financial analysis Next Steps • measure a; remaining measure h • what existing funding has already been allo cated? • po tential funding sources • lo cal revenue availability • state eligibility • voter-approved options = funding plan scenario s: what do es implementation lo ok like? 23
Draft Master Plan Diagrams 24 24
draft master plan diagrams | approach Elementary Schools • -year projections • Exception: Plan to maintain current enrollment K-8 and Middle Schools • Ensure a capacity that meets existing enrollment while allowing future flexibility Meet Educational Specification goals of parity and equity Accommodate Kindergarten / Special Education flexibility 25
draft master plan diagrams | how to read them Key update finishes (flooring, walls, ceilings, lighting, etc) rearrange walls/spaces to align with ed specs new, stick-built construction 26
school site name | existing or proposed [placeholder] insert diagrams relevant to the town hall audience 27
next steps 0 th | SSC 1-on-1 Meetings week of February 1 Schedule appointment with LPA 7 th | FMPC meeting #4 March 1 Total Program Cost + Potential Funding Sources School Sites, Community, Stakeholders Priorities FMPC Prioritization Activity 28
table set-ups School Site Committee Welcome Packet (2) SSC Questionnaire (bring to 1 -on-1 meeting) Program Vision Document Brief Site Priorities Summary Existing Site Plan (1 1 x1 7) Draft Master Plan Diagram (poster size) Are you a Principal? Bring these back to your school sites! 29
Recommend
More recommend
