Cupertino Union School District Facilities Master Plan Committee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cupertino union school district
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Cupertino Union School District Facilities Master Plan Committee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cupertino Union School District Facilities Master Plan Committee Meeting 0 1 | October 1 5, 20 1 9 1 agenda | fmp committee meeting 01 Introductions + Committee Welcome 5 minutes FMP Team + Process Overview 1 5 minutes 45 minutes


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Facilities Master Plan Committee

Meeting 0 1 | October 1 5, 20 1 9

Cupertino Union School District

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Introductions + Committee Welcome FMP Team + Process Overview Principal Surveys + Preliminary Needs Assessment Findings Defining Success Next Steps + Open Discussion Goal-Setting Activity Roundtable Discussion 5 minutes 1 5 minutes 45 minutes 20 minutes 30 minutes 5 minutes

agenda | fmp committee meeting 01

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Purpose: To develop broad visioning concepts, review and provide input on the development of the site master plans, and inform the proposed prioritization of projects. Members of this committee also function as communication ambassadors to their representative stakeholder groups.

facilities master plan committee (fmpc)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Walter Estay

Project Manager Architecture

Andrea Pippin

Educational Facilities Planner Architecture

Jim Kisel

Principal Director of School Planning Architecture

Matt Anderson

Program Manager EMG Facilities Assessment

introductions | our team

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

W hy did you join the FMP Committee?

roundtable activity

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Sacramento San Jose San Diego Irvine San Antonio Dallas

53

years in business

425+

employees

125

staff dedicated to education

120 +

sustainable projects

energy & water use, user experience, health + wellness focus 6

introductions | firm overview

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

engineering furniture landscape architecture single-point LPA contact architecture interior design technology educational facility planning

  • FMP is first step in facilities improvement process
  • recommended every 3-5 years by CDE and to apply

for state funding

  • important to engage District and local

community stakeholders

  • data driven decision making
  • sustainable focus facilitates good stewardship
  • development of high performance learning

environments

  • mission and strategic vision

a holistic approach to problem solving that places the client and students at the center fostering participation and direct interaction with the multidisciplinary team of specialists

client-inclusive and stakeholder driven

7

integrated design | process

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

8

FMP Process Overview

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 9

Cupertino USD Missio n Statement

  • centered

environment that cultivates character, fosters academic excellence, and embraces

  • diversity. District families, communities, and staff join as partners to develop

creative, exemplary learners with the skills and enthusiasm to contribute to a

approach | process

Strategic Plan

slide-10
SLIDE 10

1 1

1 focused master plan

  • maintenance and repair driven
  • proposed scopes managed to an available funding budget
  • school and community expectations tempered

2 comprehensive long-term vision

  • starts with educational philosophy for how students will

learn in the future

  • discovers the impact of educational programs to facilities
  • phased implementation approach

defining success

FMP process organization | approach

slide-11
SLIDE 11

1 1

Community Outreach Final Facilities Master Plan Recommendations Facilities Condition Assessments

  • Campus Overview
  • Existing Conditio ns
  • Health/ Life Safety

Issues

  • Code/ ADA Compliance
  • Building Systems

Visual Observations

  • Lo cal Revenue
  • State Eligibility
  • Vo ter Appro ved

Options

  • Funding Plan

Scenario s

Financial Analysis

  • Enro llment Trends
  • Site Capacities
  • Student Lo ading

Standards

  • Attendance

Bo undaries

  • New Develo pment

Demographics Review

  • Guiding Principles
  • Student Learning

Methodologies

  • Pro gram Standards
  • Techno logy Integratio n
  • Increased Student Outco mes

and Achievements

Educational Vision and Goals

  • Community Stakeho lders
  • District Staff and Teachers
  • Parents and Students
  • Communicate Needs
  • Campus Master Plan Concepts
  • Build Suppo rt fo r District Goals

Collaboration Cost Estimates and Prioritization

1 1

FMP process organization | components

slide-12
SLIDE 12

1 2

approach | process schedule

slide-13
SLIDE 13

1 3

  • W hat Are Your Goals for the Master Plan?
  • W hat Big District + Community Topics Should the Master Plan Consider?

group activity

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Stakeholder Engagement Update

Principal Surveys

1 4

slide-15
SLIDE 15

1 5

Poor Functions, but needs improvement Excellent

campus organization and ability to support current enrollment classrooms staff and administrative spaces food service spaces shared student spaces (library, assembly, social spaces) physical education / athletics buildings playgrounds / asphalt / fields special education spaces parking, drop-off / pick-up restrooms

How would you rank the functionality of the following:

principal survey | district-wide results

slide-16
SLIDE 16

1 6

Poor Functions, but needs improvement Excellent

campus organization and ability to support current enrollment classrooms staff and administrative spaces food service spaces shared student spaces (library, assembly, social spaces) physical education / athletics buildings playgrounds / asphalt / fields special education spaces parking, drop-off / pick-up restrooms

How would you rank the functionality of the following:

principal survey | elementary school results

(McAuliffe School)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

1 7

Poor Functions, but needs improvement Excellent

campus organization and ability to support current enrollment classrooms staff and administrative spaces food service spaces shared student spaces (library, assembly, social spaces) physical education / athletics buildings playgrounds / asphalt / fields special education spaces parking, drop-off / pick-up restrooms

furniture in the

How would you rank the functionality of the following:

principal survey | middle school results

slide-18
SLIDE 18

1 8

Frequency that item was mentioned as a top priority:

playfields, hardcourts, and track improvements parking, drop-off, access improvements fencing / securable campus playgrounds (play yards, play structures) classroom renovation / modernization restroom improvements / access for TK, K, SDC exterior paint / roof improvements

  • utdoor dining (shade, table area)

large group meeting space (whole-school assemblies) replace portables with permanent construction GLC improvements (acoustics, technology, as a shared learning space) flexible furniture expand / build new administration purpose-built student support spaces (counselors, RSP, etc)

  • ther

principal survey | district-wide

each of the following was mentioned once: outdoor learning spaces, storage for electives, classroom technology, flex space, electronic marquee, quad, new gym, library, outdoor lighting, kitchen upgrade

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Facilities Needs Assessments

Findings To-Date

1 9

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Focus Group Interviews

  • maintenance, skilled maintenance
  • hvac
  • plumbing
  • electrical
  • grounds
  • student nutrition
  • transportation & garage
  • information technology

Principal Survey and Interview

  • nline survey
  • follow-up conversation

Site Walks

  • LPA

functionality assessment

  • EMG

repair- and replacement-driven assessment

facility needs assessments | components

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

roof repairs fire alarm systems upgrades interior modernization (flooring, paint, tackable walls, ceilings) refurbish casework technology refresh new construction accessibility upgrades restroom upgrades lighting upgrades storm drain and site utility improvements lunch shelters

facility needs assessments | good work done to-date

21

Measure H Projects

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

facility needs assessments | common themes

  • Garden Gate ES
  • McAuliffe
  • Meyerholz ES
  • Muir ES
  • Regnart ES
  • Sedgwick ES
  • Stevens Creek ES
  • West Valley ES
  • Blue Hills ES
  • Collins ES
  • Eaton ES
  • Murdock-Portal ES
  • Operations Center

CATEGORY [0 ] CATEGORY [1 ] CATEGORY [2]

CATEGORY [0 ] received full interior modernization CATEGORY [1 ] received limited interior modernization CATEGORY [2] has not received modernization

  • De Vargas ES
  • Dilworth ES
  • Eisenhower ES
  • Faria ES
  • Lincoln ES
  • Montclaire ES
  • Nimitz ES
  • Stocklmeir ES
  • Cupertino MS
  • Hyde MS
  • Kennedy MS
  • Lawson MS
  • Miller MS
slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Focus Group Meetings damaged floors, roofing at portables hardcourts need a slurry, seal, and re-stripe at all sites switch to rubber surfacing at all play equipment turf field and rubberized track at all middle schools roof assessment (20 1 8): 40 % of all district roofs need to be restored or replaced sewer re-piping within the buildings electrical capacity upgrades to support increasing classroom technology needs using the Cupertino MS model, add event centers to other middle schools food service: indoor serving areas are desired (most sites have service windows) transportation: replace the 1 5 to 1 7 older buses technology: increase wireless capacity; create an IP-based network for phone/ clock/ intercom; re-cabling + true IDF room at all sites

facility needs assessments | common themes

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Expressed/ Observed at Site Walk add flexible furniture to the classrooms want space for whole-school assemblies (indoors or covered outdoor space) want a track at the field and renovated asphalt / hardscape develop purpose-built spaces for student support programs (counselors, therapists), including sensory and cool-down spaces add parking / lengthen drop-off add restrooms for TK and Kindergarten classrooms address sewer back-ups in a long-term solution improve campus perimeter security remove portable classrooms finish out the technology refresh (short-throw projectors)

facility needs assessments | common themes

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Frequency that item was mentioned as a top priority:

fencing / securable campus playfields, hardcourts, and track improvements parking, drop-off, access improvements restroom improvements / access for TK, K, SDC flexible furniture purpose-built student support spaces (counselors, RSP, etc) large group meeting space (whole-school assemblies)

  • utdoor dining (shade, table area)

GLC improvements (acoustics, technology, as a shared learning space) playgrounds (play yards, play structures) kitchen upgrade

  • utdoor learning spaces

expand / build new administration flex space for students electronic marquee

principal survey | category 0 schools

  • Garden Gate ES
  • McAuliffe
  • Meyerholz ES
  • Muir ES
  • Regnart ES
  • Sedgwick ES
  • Stevens Creek ES
  • West Valley ES

CATEGORY [0 ] CATEGORY [0 ] received full interior mo dernization

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Frequency that item was mentioned as a top priority:

principal survey | category 1 schools

playfields, hardcourts, and track improvements parking, drop-off, access improvements replace portables with permanent construction exterior paint / roof improvements classroom renovation / modernization fencing / securable campus expand / build new administration playgrounds (play yards, play structures) large group meeting space (whole-school assemblies)

  • utdoor dining (shade, table area)

flexible furniture GLC improvements (acoustics, technology, as a shared learning space) classroom technology quad improvements library improvements

  • utdoor lighting

restroom improvements / access for TK, K, SDC new gym

  • De Vargas ES
  • Dilworth ES
  • Eisenhower ES
  • Faria ES
  • Lincoln ES
  • Mo ntclaire ES
  • Nimitz ES
  • Stocklmeir ES
  • Cupertino MS
  • Kennedy MS
  • Lawso n MS
  • Miller MS

CATEGORY [1 ] CATEGORY [1 ] received limited interior mo dernization

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Frequency that item was mentioned as a top priority:

principal survey | category 2 schools

GLC improvements (acoustics, technology, as a shared learning space) playgrounds (play yards, play structures) classroom renovation / modernization restroom improvements / access for TK, K, SDC kitchen upgrade large group meeting space (whole-school assemblies)

  • utdoor dining (shade, table area)

exterior paint / roof improvements better storage for electives

  • Blue Hills ES
  • Collins ES
  • Eaton ES
  • Murdock-Po rtal ES
  • Operations Center

CATEGORY [2] CATEGORY [2] has not received interior mo dernization

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

How W ill You Define Success for This Master Plan?

roundtable activity

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Repair/ Replace Assessment Findings Educational Program Vision Middle School Sites Opportunities Charrette Next Steps + Open Discussion

November 1 9th | fmpc 02 agenda

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

FMP website coming soon!

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31