cse 416 section 1
play

CSE 416, Section 1 Semester Project Discussion Session Objectives - PDF document

Session 2 Project Overview CSE 416, Section 1 Semester Project Discussion Session Objectives Understand issues and terminology used in US congressional redistricting and voting analysis Understand data requirements to support voting


  1. Session 2 – Project Overview CSE 416, Section 1 Semester Project Discussion Session Objectives � Understand issues and terminology used in US congressional redistricting and voting analysis � Understand data requirements to support voting analysis � Become familiar with gerrymandering and techniques to measure the relative amount of gerrymandering in a state district plan � Understand issues associated with currently available data We will explore the project functionality in more detail in the next 1-3 class sessions 2 � Robert Kelly, 2020 1 9/24/2020 � Robert Kelly, 2020

  2. Session 2 – Project Overview Teams � You should form your team soon (4 members) � You can register a 3-member team, but I will likely add a 4 th member You register your team by You should use Piazza to sending me an email message look for possible students in with the names of the team your team members 3 � Robert Kelly, 2020 Project Background � Project based on � Fall 2017 CSE308 – apply quantitative measures of political gerrymandering � Fall 2018 CSE308 – explore feasibility of algorithms for the generation of districts � Spring 2019 – explore feasibility of integrating demographic data � Fall 2019 – analyze demographic voting patterns Underlying issue is the � Lessons learned from previous projects question of racial fairness in US elections � Robust set of data available � Graph algorithms for the generation of viable congressional districts 4 � Robert Kelly, 2020 2 9/24/2020 � Robert Kelly, 2020

  3. Session 2 – Project Overview Why This is an Important and Interesting Topic � Very current � Lots of interesting CS concepts and technologies � Multiple languages � Multiple computers � Database � algorithms � Realistic software development project 5 � Robert Kelly, 2020 Background Info � Every state has a number of Population in districts congressional districts proportional to the state population must be almost equal � Population is recalculated after a US Census, and district boundaries must be recalculated if the number of representatives change or population shifts � District boundaries can also change due to court decisions (e.g., Pennsylvania, North Carolina, etc.) Most states will be redistricted following the 2020 census US Census is performed every 10 years 6 � Robert Kelly, 2020 3 9/24/2020 � Robert Kelly, 2020

  4. Session 2 – Project Overview Precincts (sometimes known as Wards) � Lowest level government division � Contained in one polling place � Data usually available for voting totals 7 System Background � Current redistricting approach leads to many unfair practices (Gerrymandering) � Some US states have a history of denying equal voting to some minority groups (e.g., African American) � Recent approaches involve “packing” minorities into a small number of districts, thereby minimizing their overall representation "I propose that we draw the maps to give a partisan advantage to 10 Republicans and three Democrats because I do not believe it’s possible to draw a map with 11 Republicans and two Democrats.“ – Chairman of NC House redistricting committee 8 � Robert Kelly, 2020 4 9/24/2020 � Robert Kelly, 2020

  5. Session 2 – Project Overview What is a Gerrymander? � Refers to a voting district that resembles a salamander � Named after Eldridge Gerry, 5 th VP of US 9 � Robert Kelly, 2020 Why is Gerrymandering a Hot Topic? � Gerrymandering is a practice intended to establish an advantage for a particular party or group by manipulating district boundaries � Usually features “cracking” (split opposing party voters into many districts and “packing” (packing maximum number of opposing party voters in to a handful of districts) � Occurring in the US since 1812 � Used aggressively in 2010, resulting in congressional dysfunction Definition from Wikipedia 10 � Robert Kelly, 2020 5 9/24/2020 � Robert Kelly, 2020

  6. Session 2 – Project Overview Consequences of Current Gerrymandering � Many congressional seats are not competitive � Members of congress are more concerned with a primary battle than an election battle � Republicans and Democrats represent their party’s position more than the wishes of their constituents � Extremes of each party dominate, instead of the middle Congressional Gridlock 11 � Robert Kelly, 2020 1965 Voting Rights Act � VRA � Forced selected states to obtain pre- clearance for any election change that might affect the right to vote in a state � Was very effective in restoring voting rights in the pre-clearance states � 2013 decision of Supreme Court struck down parts (e.g., preclearance) of the VRA � Majority-minority provisions remain, which has been used to enable district packing of congressional districts 12 � Robert Kelly, 2020 6 9/24/2020 � Robert Kelly, 2020

  7. Session 2 – Project Overview Minority Packing � Congressional redistricting in many states is controlled by one political party � The party in power tries to preserve its power by drawing voting districts that favor the party � Data is now available that show the voting preferences and racial/ethnic characteristics of individual geographic locations � Redistricting groups attempt to “pack” opposition voters (70%-80%) into a small number of districts while “cracking” the remaining opposition voters (40%-45%) into the remaining districts 13 � Robert Kelly, 2020 Congressional District Observations � Many districts appear oddly shaped, possibly due to attempts to pack minority groups � Recent measurements of gerrymandering, but not including racial/ethnic origins � New probabilistic approach to measuring gerrymandering developed at Duke University � MGGG applied a probabilistic approach to Virginia state legislature districting to measure racial gerrymandering � Probabilistic measures limited by computational requirement 14 � Robert Kelly, 2020 7 9/24/2020 � Robert Kelly, 2020

  8. Session 2 – Project Overview Fall 2020 Project � Apply a modified version of the Duke and MGGG for a large number of states � Measure the extent to which current districting plans appear to be biased in terms of racial/ethnic distribution of population in congressional districts � Consider legal effects of packing in analysis (e.g., urban vs. rural) � Consider impact of VRA on packing effects Computation of this analysis requires an interesting combination of programming (multi-processors), computer science (e.g., graph algorithms), and applied math 15 � Robert Kelly, 2020 High Level View of the Project � Build a robust system to � Display a current districting plan for a state � Generate a “random” set of districting plans for the state � Calculate the racial/ethnic population in each random district � Generate the racial/ethnic population distribution � Determine if the current districting plan does not appear fair � Generate a large number of districting plans on a high performance computer � Display graphic results to the user 16 � Robert Kelly, 2020 8 9/24/2020 � Robert Kelly, 2020

  9. Session 2 – Project Overview Generating a “Random” District � Goal - Allow congressional district boundaries to be automatically determined in a “random” way � Approach � Treat precincts as nodes in a graph � Edges in the graph are defined by contiguity (200+ foot shared border) � Partition the statewide precinct graph into the set of connected sub- graphs � Rebalance the sub-graphs to satisfy state districting constraints (e.g., equal population, compactness) 17 � Robert Kelly, 2020 System Display � Districts and precinct boundaries are displayed � The characteristics of a large number of random districting plans are displayed � Setup of a run defines the constraints in districting (e.g., compactness) Data is available from multiple data sources 18 � Robert Kelly, 2020 9 9/24/2020 � Robert Kelly, 2020

  10. Session 2 – Project Overview Project Requirements Analysis � You will generate detailed requirements (use cases) � Requirements will evolve over the first 6 weeks of the project � Top-Level functional requirements provided in first 2 weeks of class sessions � You will develop detailed requirements based on top-level requirements � Team requirements aggregated into a master use-case list � Near-final set of use cases by early October 19 � Robert Kelly, 2020 Ethnic Minority Data � Ethnic minority data should be included in your precinct data � 1965 Voting Rights Act mandates the establishment of districts in which an ethnic minority constitutes a majority within the district Each precinct includes demographic data originated from the US Census Bureau 20 � Robert Kelly, 2020 10 9/24/2020 � Robert Kelly, 2020

  11. Session 2 – Project Overview VRA Preclearance States � Alabama � Alaska � Arizona Your team will choose 3 � Georgia states to analyze, and at least one of them will be a � Louisiana pre-clearance state � Mississippi � South Carolina � Texas � Virginia 21 � Robert Kelly, 2020 What Data is Needed? � Geospatial boundary data A data repository will be made � Precincts available to you that will contain � Existing Congressional districts some of the data you need � Cities/counties � Census tracts (including demographic data) � Election results data Multiple data sources can be used to measure the party preference of a precinct (congressional vote, presidential vote, registration, etc.) 22 � Robert Kelly, 2020 11 9/24/2020 � Robert Kelly, 2020

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend