council offsite workshop council offsite workshop
play

Council Offsite Workshop Council Offsite Workshop FY 2012 and Beyond - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

City of Ann Arbor Council Offsite Workshop Council Offsite Workshop FY 2012 and Beyond y Dec 2010 Economic Environment Outlook Serious implications for City Unemployment (Oct): Ann Arbor Area 7.8% (prelim) Michigan 12.8%


  1. City of Ann Arbor Council Offsite Workshop Council Offsite Workshop FY 2012 and Beyond y Dec 2010

  2. Economic Environment Outlook � Serious implications for City • – Unemployment (Oct): Ann Arbor Area – 7.8% (prelim) Michigan – 12.8% (prelim) – State Shared Revenue – Flat – State’s Core Budget Issues – Unresolved – Investment Interest Rates – Near 0% – Operating Revenues Operating Revenues ‐ Net decline in property tax receipts – affects all millage funds ‐ Decline in Court fees and Parking Ticket receipts ‐ Improved revenue in Golf operations I d i G lf ti – Utilities ‐ Largely flat demand – Stimulus Funds – Do not help recurring operations

  3. City’s Financial Challenge G General Fund: l F d • Constrained Revenue • Healthcare and Retiree Benefit Costs Increasing • Budget Targets • Budget Targets ‐ Align budget strategy with labor strategy ‐ Tighten assumptions so less likely to produce surplus • Reductions Needed: Reductions Needed: ‐ FY 12 & FY 13 require 2.5% ‐ > 4.0%; higher reductions driven by healthcare ‐ 4.0% targeted reductions presume entire service unit is on old healthcare plan, which results in the incremental 1.5% reduction Utility Funds: • Generally Flat Demand; reducing $ available for future capital • Capital Improvements Still Needed Solid Waste: Financially Struggling – Cost reduction strategy in place since 2004. Alternatives Study – in process. G lf C Golf Courses: • $ Results Improving but Still Not Self ‐ Sustaining

  4. General Fund revenues are not projected to return to FY 2008 levels until 2015 General Fund Revenues $86 $84 $82 $82 $80 Millions $78 2012 2013 $76 Property tax rev: ‐ 0.5% +0.4% State Shared Rev Flat Flat $74 Fees/Charges Fees/Charges Flat Flat Flat Flat $72 DDA Transfer $2 Mil $2 Mil $70 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Planned High Low 4

  5. Active Employee Healthcare Costs Cost / Employee / Year Cost / Employee / Year $12,500 $12,000 $11,500 $11,441 $11,000 $10,500 $10,178 $10 000 $10,000 $9,740 $9,500 $9,356 $9,000 $8,486 $8,953 $8,648 $8,500 $8,000 $7,983 $8,333 $7,500 $ $7,000 $6,893 $6,852 $6,500 $6,362 $6,382 $6,000 $5,923 $5,500 $5,500 $5,173 $5,173 $5,000 $4,500 June 2003 June 2004 June 2005 June 2006 June 2007 June 2008 June 2009 June 2010 Natl. Avg. City As of Ann Arbor Plan Year ending June 30 5

  6. Comparison of Healthcare Plan Design City Plan – High Design / AFSCME Police Fire Low Design Employee High Design Low Design $0 $0 $0 Contributions Contributions – Single $44 Single: $44 (Monthly) Double: $100 $0 Family: $120 Deductible $300 / $600 $1000 / $225 per $250 / $500 $250 / $500 $2000 individual Office visit copay $10 $15 $15 $15 $15 Coinsurance Coinsurance 80% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Out of Pocket Max $1,200 / $2,400 / None None None $2,500 $4,800 Prescription $10 / $30 $20 / $40 $10 / $25 $10 / $25 $10 / $20 2x Mail 1x Mail 1x Mail 1x Mail FY 12 $10,686 $12,310 $13,121 $12,871 Net Cost Per Net Cost Per Employee Per Year 6

  7. Pension system is 90% funded. Financial market meltdown increased on ‐ going contributions from 2009 levels to projected 2016 l levels l Pension Contributions (Total City) $25.0 Assets (June 2010): $349 Mil. 90% Funded $20.0 $15.0 Required q Contributions $10.0 $ $5.0 $ ‐

  8. Retiree healthcare (VEBA trust) overall 30% funded. Retiree Healthcare Contributions (Total City) ( y) $25.0 Assets (June 2010): $63 Mil. 30% Funded $20.0 $20.0 Required Contributions $15.0 $10.0 $5 0 $5.0 $ ‐

  9. Significant Events on Horizon • Settlement of Labor Contracts (AAPOA, COAM, IAFF, & AFSCME) ‐ Could result in departure of a significant number of experienced employees ‐ Increased contract costs will not be covered in the I d t t t ill t b d i th proposed Two Year Fiscal Plan. • State Budget – Implications from how State resolves • State Budget Implications from how State resolves structural issues • Federal Policy changes y g • Other ?

  10. Questions

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend