contractual compliance update icann 53 24 june 2015 agenda
play

Contractual Compliance Update ICANN 53 | 24 June 2015 Agenda - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Contractual Compliance Update ICANN 53 | 24 June 2015 Agenda Update Since ICANN 52 Update related to Audit Activities Update related to Registrars & RAA Compliance e ff orts Update related to Registries & RA Compliance


  1. Contractual Compliance Update ICANN 53 | 24 June 2015

  2. Agenda Update Since ICANN 52 ¤ Update related to Audit Activities ¤ Update related to Registrars & RAA Compliance e ff orts ¤ Update related to Registries & RA Compliance e ff orts ¤ Questions and Answers | 3

  3. Update related to Audit Activities since ICANN 52

  4. Audit Activities since ICANN 52 Three-Year Audit Program (last year of the program) ¤ Year-three Phase launched October 2014 and completed May 2015 ¤ 316 Registrars originally selected ¤ Five Registrars rolled over from Year-two ¤ Five “legacy” Registry Operators ¤ Two Registrars terminated due to inability to provide requested documentation ¤ Five Registrars terminated prior to the commencement of the audit ¤ The audit report will be published in July 2015 | 5

  5. Year–3 Registrar Audit - Preliminary Result Per ercent entag age of e of 2009 R 2009 RAA AA 2013 R 2013 RAA AA 2013 R 2013 RAA Pr AA Provision Description ovision Description Registr gistrar ars with s with Provision Pr ovision Provision Pr ovision Sample Siz Sample Size: 124 R e: 124 Registr gistrar ars s deficiencies deficiencies Complianc Compliance with Consensus P e with Consensus Policies & T olicies & Tempor emporar ary P y Policies – olicies – 4.3.1 4.3.1 4.1 4.1 29% 29% TEAC TEA C 3.12 3.12 3.12 3.12 Reseller Agr eseller Agreement (mandat eement (mandator ory pr y provisions) ovisions) 26% 26% 5.11 5.11 7.6 7.6 Updat Update c e cont ontact inf act information in R ormation in RAD ADAR AR 23% 23% 3.3.1 t 3.3.1 to 3.3.5 o 3.3.5 3.3.1 t 3.3.1 to 3.3.5 o 3.3.5 Whois Whois – Int – Inter eractive Webp active Webpag age, Corr e, Corresponding Dat esponding Data Elements a Elements 16% 16% 3.16 3.16 3.17 3.17 Registr gistrar c ar cont ontact de act details on r ails on registr gistrar’ ar’s websit s website e 15% 15% Complianc Compliance with Consensus P e with Consensus Policies & T olicies & Tempor emporar ary P y Policies – olicies – 4.3.1 4.3.1 4.1 4.1 10% 10% ERRP ERRP 3.10 3.10 3.10 3.10 Insur Insuranc ance e 7% 7% Complianc Compliance with Consensus P e with Consensus Policies & T olicies & Tempor emporar ary P y Policies – olicies – 4.3.1 4.3.1 4.1 4.1 6% 6% WDRP WDRP 3.4.2 3.4.2 3.4.2 3.4.2 Retention of R ention of Registr gistration Dat ation Data a 4% 4% 3.4.2 3.4.2 3.4.2 3.4.2 Payments ayments 4% 4% EDDP – Domain name rene EDDP – Domain name r enewal, pr al, provision of applic ovision of applicable able 3.7.5.3 to 3.7.5.6 3.7.5.3 t o 3.7.5.6 3.7.5.3 t 3.7.5.3 to 3.7.5.6 o 3.7.5.6 2% 2% information t inf ormation to r o registr gistrants ants 4.3.1 4.3.1 4.1 4.1 Complianc Compliance with Consensus P e with Consensus Policies & T olicies & Tempor emporar ary P y Policies – IR olicies – IRTP TP 2% 2% | 6

  6. Audit Activities since ICANN 52 New Registry Agreement Audit Program ¤ Launched another round in March 2015 ¤ 11 Registries selected ¤ Scheduled to complete July 2015 ¤ The audit report will be published in September 2015 What’s Next? ¤ Preparing for 2013 RAA and future rounds of the new RA audits ¤ Detailed slides are available in the Appendix Link to the ICANN Contractual Compliance Audit Page: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/audits-2012-02-25-en | 7

  7. Update related to Registrars & RAA Compliance e ff orts since ICANN 52

  8. RAA Lessons Learned Summary & Guidelines Whois Accuracy Program Specification 1 Distinguishing between verification and validation Abuse Reports Requirements 2 Establishing investigative processes Domain Renewal Requirements 3 Sending timely reminders to registered name holder General UDRP Issue 4 Verifying with UDRP providers and preventing improper transfer Inter-Registrar Transfer 5 Using the correct Forms of Authorization (FOAs) | 9

  9. 1. Whois Inaccuracy Notices and WAPS ¤ ICANN looking for one of three results to Whois inaccuracy complaint: ¤ Whois updated within 15 days of notifying RNH – registrar provided documentation of validation of updates and verification (including a ff irmative response or manual verification) ¤ No response from RNH within 15 days of notifying RNH – domain suspended until registrar has verified information ¤ Whois verified as accurate (no change) within 15 days of notifying RNH – registrar provided documentation of verification ¤ ICANN may also request evidence of WAPS fulfillment under Section 1 | 10

  10. 2. Abuse Reports - ICANN Complaint Processing ¤ ICANN confirms that reporter sent abuse report to registrar abuse contact before sending complaint to registrar ¤ ICANN could request the: ¤ Steps taken to investigate and respond to abuse report ¤ Time taken to respond to abuse report ¤ Correspondence with complainant and registrant ¤ Link to website’s abuse contact email and handling procedure ¤ Location of dedicated abuse email and telephone for law-enforcement reports ¤ Whois abuse contacts, email and phone ¤ Examples of steps registrars took to investigate and respond to abuse reports: ¤ Contacting registrant ¤ Asking for and obtaining evidence or licenses ¤ Providing hosting provider info to complainant ¤ Performing Whois verification ¤ Performing transfer upon request of registrant ¤ Suspending domain | 11

  11. 2. Abuse Reports – Resolve Codes ¤ Abuse contact info published on registrar website ¤ Added required abuse information in Whois output ¤ Abuse report handling procedures published on registrar website ¤ Registrar suspended or canceled domain ¤ Registrar demonstrated that it maintained abuse records ¤ Registrar responded to abuse report (non-LEA), including: ¤ Communicating report to registrant ¤ Registrant provides copy of government license ¤ Reporter removed from email distribution list (spam complaint) ¤ Website content in complaint removed ¤ Registrar responded to LEA illegal activity reports ¤ Registrar documented valid non-action, including ¤ Registrar previously responded to complaint ¤ Invalid abuse complaint ¤ Registrar now monitoring abuse email address/phone ¤ Registrar showed email/phone already published | 12

  12. Abuse Complaint Type & Top Closure Reasons (January – May 2015) Requested ¡ evidence ¡not ¡ provided ¡ 52.5% ¡ Invalid ¡TLD ¡ Abuse ¡ ¡ 15.3% ¡ Domain ¡ Duplicate ¡ suspended ¡or ¡ complaint ¡ canceled ¡ ¡ Responded ¡to ¡ (open) ¡ 8.5% ¡ abuse ¡report ¡ 11.9% ¡ (non-­‑LEA) ¡ 11.9% ¡ | 13

  13. WHOIS ARS Background and Goals The WHOIS AR The WHOIS ARS Mandat S Mandate: e: ¤ The Board directed the CEO to establish a project to: Proactively identify inaccurate gTLD registration data, exploring the use of • automated tools Forward potentially inaccurate records to registrars for action • Publicly report on the resulting actions to encourage improvement • The WHOIS AR The WHOIS ARS Objective S Objective ¤ Systematically Report on Accuracy Extract from: Next Steps for WHOIS Accuracy (24 June 2015) | 14

  14. Whois ARS Compliance Pilot Whois ARS Contractual Compliance Pilot Overview Go Goal of Complianc al of Compliance Pilot e Pilot: To test the proof of concept of using Whois ARS data to generate and forward - valid Whois inaccuracy and Whois format complaints to registrars Summar Summary of Events fr y of Events from Januar om January – April 2015: y – April 2015: Telephone and email inaccuracy reports sent to contractual compliance - Conducted Initial review and validation of the data and collaborated with the - Whois ARS ICANN and vendors Uploaded the data into the complaint processing system - Began processing complaints - Stopped processing to address data issues based on registrar feedback - Resumed complaint processing - Closed complaints in system if data was incomplete or did not meet the - contractual criteria | 15

  15. Whois ARS Compliance Pilot Whois ARS Compliance Pilot Overview ¤ Complaint V Complaint Volume and out olume and outcome ome ¤ 10510 complaint tickets created ¤ 71 tickets sent to registrars ¤ 10439 closed before sending to Registrars (see below) ¤ Closur Closure R e Resolve Codes esolve Codes: ¤ Incomplete (9941) ¤ Domain not registered (337) ¤ Domain suspended or canceled (208) ¤ Complaint inconsistent with current Whois (12) ¤ Data changed (9) ¤ Registrar verified correct (8) Note: ¡some ¡complaints ¡are ¡closed ¡with ¡mul4ple ¡closure ¡codes; ¡total ¡will ¡not ¡equal ¡to ¡10510 ¡ | 16

  16. Update related to Registries & RA Compliance e ff orts since ICANN 52

  17. RA Lessons Learned Summary & Guidelines Abuse Contact Data 1 Required elements to be published Zone File Access Requirements (CZDS) 2 Reasons for denial of access Controlled Interruption (CI) 3 Complying with Name Collision Assessment Letter(s) Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) 4 Complying with lock and suspension requirements List of Registered Domain Names (LORDN) 5 Clarifications on uploading LORDN files to the Trademark Database | 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend