Contents: Why? How? Anthropogenic CO 2 production The increase of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

contents why how anthropogenic co 2 production the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Contents: Why? How? Anthropogenic CO 2 production The increase of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Towards on-line monitoring of 14 C in atmospheric CO 2 H.A.J. Meijer 1 , D. Paul 1,2 , E. Ilkmen 2 , and D.E. Murnick 2 1 Centre for Isotope Research, University of Groningen, The Netherlands 2 Department of Physics, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Global Monitoring Annual Conference Boulder, May 18&19, 2011

Towards on-line monitoring of 14C in atmospheric CO2

H.A.J. Meijer1, D. Paul1,2, E. Ilkmen2, and D.E. Murnick2

1Centre for Isotope Research, University of Groningen, The Netherlands 2Department of Physics, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102

Contents:  Why?  How?

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Anthropogenic CO2 production

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The increase of atmospheric CO2 is half of what we expect

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The European carbon balance (TgC/yr) (positive numbers: flux into the atmosphere)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Need of methods to distinguish “natural” from fossil CO2

  • Fossil fuel CO2 is by far the dominant net source
  • Commercial statistics are not accurate enough:

neither in place, nor in time

  • The Kyoto (and successor!) treaties require

reliable and verifiable CO2 emission data to independently check measures and agreements

#1 candidate:

14C: “Radiocarbon”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

14C or Radiocarbon

  • Radio-active (half life 5730 yrs), so fossil fuel is 14C-free
  • Extremely rare: abundance of 10-12 in modern carbon

400 ppm CO2

14C

“1” / 0 ‰ 404 ppm CO2

14C

“0.99” / -10 ‰ Add 1% CO2-ffx

1 ‰ precision in 14C corresponds to 0.4 ppm CO2-ffx

slide-7
SLIDE 7

14CO2 in The Netherlands compared to European background

High Alpine station Jungfraujoch (3500 m) Data from the Dutch coastal station Lutjewad Van der Laan et al., Tellus (2010), 62B, 389–402

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Measurements of the fossil fuel CO2 concentration for the Netherlands

slide-9
SLIDE 9

14C measurements are expensive and labor-intensive

Samples need to be taken individually (either “grab samples” or integrated ones) Need to be transported to an AMS facility Need extensive pretreatment: Extraction of CO2, graphitization, target preparation Require a complicated and expensive facility: AMS installation CIO Groningen University

slide-10
SLIDE 10

14CO2 laser tube

Intracavity Sample cell

12CO2 laser

Reference cell

The alternative: ICOGS

Intra Cavity Opto Galvanic Spectroscopy

Potential for continuous

in situ 14CO2 measurements

Daniel E.Murnick et al., Analytical Chemistry 2008, 4820- 4824

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SELECTIVITY

14CO2 laser

transition At 11.8µ

Laser resonances in CO2 are Isotope Dependent

Lincoln Laboratory Journal, 3, 491 (1990)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SENSITIVITY achieved through THE OPTOGALVANIC EFFECT (OGE) and high (intra-cavity) laser power Laser radiation changes distribution of various species within an electrical discharge which changes the electron energy distribution function. This leads to an easily measurable impedance change of the system .

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ICOGS, similar to IRMS and AMS, produces a Double Ratio Signal:

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Normalized OGE Signal (V) C14 "Modern"

14Csample/12Csample 14Cref/12Cref

“DR”=

slide-14
SLIDE 14

High Potential: signal precision corresponds to <1‰

Items to be (re)solved: non-linearity Drift of reference cell P and T dependence Electrical Noise

13C dependence

slide-15
SLIDE 15

We’ll keep you posted!

Support: NSF Grant (Newark), RWE grant (Groningen)

Dipayan Paul Erhan Ilkmen Daniel Murnick Harro Meijer