Risk assessment of anthropogenic substances in water in the Netherlands
- Drs. Nicole Nijhuis
European Registered Toxicologist KWR Watercycle Research Institute
1
Risk assessment of anthropogenic substances in water in the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
1 Risk assessment of anthropogenic substances in water in the Netherlands Drs. Nicole Nijhuis European Registered Toxicologist KWR Watercycle Research Institute Milieu en Gezondheid BE febr 2019 2 Sources Dutch drinking water Global
1
2 Milieu en Gezondheid BE febr 2019
Global increase chemical production increase chemicals found in water Netherlands sources for water production
Antibiotics
in surface water) *Data 2018
3 Milieu en Gezondheid BE febr 2019
4 antibioticaresistentie
5
6 Bridging science to practice
Who:
Where:
7 Milieu en Gezondheid BE febr 2019
Three types monitoring:
KWR can measure in water: > 60 pharmaceuticals (metabolites) > 15 antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) (Q-PCR=advanced & efficient)
8 Milieu en Gezondheid BE febr 2019
Workflow 1. Apply (legal) guideline 2. Use measured data to calculate provisional guideline value (e.g. ADI / TDI / NOAEL) 3. Predict toxicity 4. Toxicological Threshold of Concern (TTC) (exposure level with negligible health risk, conservatieve generic threshold value used for substances which have no toxicity data.
9 Milieu en Gezondheid BE febr 2019
INFORMATION EVALUATION SOURCES AND TOOLS DRINKING WATER GUIDELINE Legal standard Guideline value (§2.1) Adopt or recalculate Legislation (Table 2-1) Institutes (Table 2-1)
MEASURED DATA Established TDI, ADI, RfD, DNEL , VSD (§2.2.1) Calculate provisional drinking water guideline value Meta-databases (Table 2-2) Institutes (Table 2-2)
Established LO/NO(A)EL (§2.2.1) Calculate acceptable daily intake and provisional drinking water guideline value Meta-databases (Table 2-2) Institutes (Table 2-2) OECD QSAR Toolbox (§3.1) AMBIT (§3.2)
Other types of information (§2.2.3) Calculate NOAEL, acceptable daily intake and provisional drinking water guideline value Meta-databases (Table 2-3) Institutes (Table 2-3)
PREDICTED TOXICITY Structural alerts (§2.3.1) Chemical profiling OECD QSAR Toolbox (§3.1) AMBIT (§3.2) ToxRead (§3.3) Toxtree (§3.6) Chemotyper (§3.7) VEGA
Read across (§2.3.2) Identify suitable analogues Collect toxicity data Predict endpoint of interest OECD QSAR Toolbox (§3.1) AMBIT (§3.2) ToxRead (§3.3) AIM (§3.5) ChemMine (§3.8) Toxmatch (§3.9) VEGA (§3.13) and metabolism and physic- chemical properties
QSAR (§2.3.3) Check applicability domain Predict endpoint of interest OECD QSAR Toolbox (§3.1) AMBIT (§3.2) ToxRead (§3.3) T.E.S.T. (§3.4) VEGA (§3.13)
TTC APPROACH TTC-based drinking water guideline level (§2.4) Check exclusion categories Indications for genotoxicity? Carbamate or organophosphate? Cramer classification See ‘Structural alerts’ T.E.S.T. (§3.4) In vitro bioassays
Prediction hazard (several endpoints)
10 Milieu en Gezondheid BE febr 2019
PREDICTED TOXICITY Structural alerts (§2.3.1) Chemical profiling OECD QSAR Toolbox (§3.1) AMBIT (§3.2) ToxRead (§3.3) Toxtree (§3.6) Chemotyper (§3.7) VEGA
Read across (§2.3.2) Identify suitable analogues Collect toxicity data Predict endpoint of interest OECD QSAR Toolbox (§3.1) AMBIT (§3.2) ToxRead (§3.3) AIM (§3.5) ChemMine (§3.8) Toxmatch (§3.9) VEGA (§3.13) and metabolism and physic- chemical properties
QSAR (§2.3.3) Check applicability domain Predict endpoint of interest OECD QSAR Toolbox (§3.1) AMBIT (§3.2) ToxRead (§3.3) T.E.S.T. (§3.4) VEGA (§3.13)