PQRI PODP Extractables & Leachables Workshop Leachable - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pqri podp extractables amp leachables workshop
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PQRI PODP Extractables & Leachables Workshop Leachable - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PQRI PODP Extractables & Leachables Workshop Leachable Evaluation of a Container Closure System - What to do When Above the Threshold William P. Beierschmitt, PhD, DABT, FATS Drug Safety Research and Development Pfizer, Inc. April 2018


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PQRI PODP Extractables & Leachables Workshop

William P. Beierschmitt, PhD, DABT, FATS Drug Safety Research and Development Pfizer, Inc. Leachable Evaluation of a Container Closure System - What to do When Above the Threshold

April 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

  • The PQRI thresholds were developed based upon a comprehensive

examination of the toxicological profiles of over 600 known extractables and leachables

  • The available safety data for any given chemical should always be

considered when employing the PQRI qualification thresholds

  • Chemical knowledge trumps the classification strategy
  • Due to the rigorous process undertaken to develop and validate the

thresholds, it is reasonable to use them in cases where little or no safety data are available for a chemical

  • The thresholds are not absolutes; higher levels of chemical

extractables and leachables can be qualified on an individual basis

2

Background

slide-3
SLIDE 3

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

3

The PQRI Thresholds

Mutagenicity Concern? Yes – Qualify (ICH M7) No – Consider Sensitization/ Irritation Potential Sensitization/Irritation Concern? Yes – Qualify No – Consider Systemic Toxicity Systemic Toxicity Concern? Yes – Qualify No – Qualification Achieved!

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

4

Crossing the Threshold - What Now?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

  • Dose - There is no such thing as a non-toxic chemical, but there is

such a thing as a non-toxic dose of it (“The dose makes the poison”)

  • Route of Administration - Can affect a toxicological outcome
  • Duration - Chronic, daily exposure to a chemical carries a higher

theoretical risk of causing adverse effects than short-term exposure

  • Indication - What disease/condition is being treated by the drug

containing the chemical impurity influences the risk assessment

  • Pediatrics - Documented age-related differences in the absorption,

distribution, metabolism and excretion can affect susceptibility

  • Women of Child Bearing Potential (WOCBP) - Reproductive

toxicology endpoints should be considered if exposure is anticipated

5

Crossing the Threshold - Safety Considerations

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

  • QSAR in silico tools (if needed)
  • Genetic toxicology
  • Acute & multi-dose toxicity
  • Carcinogenicity
  • Reproductive toxicology
  • Irritation and sensitization
  • Human toxicity data
  • Special populations (eg, pediatrics)
  • Regulatory guidance information (eg, OSHA, EPA, WHO)

6

Crossing the Threshold - Data Considerations

slide-7
SLIDE 7

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

  • QSAR Tools (eg, DEREK and SARAH
  • In silico tools to predict mutagenicity concerns (both) and a wide

range of systemic toxicity endpoints (DEREK)

  • Toxtree
  • On-line tool to aid in assigning a “Cramer Class” to any given chemical;

Important when no toxicology data are available

  • Each of the 3 Cramer Classes has a Threshold of Toxicological Concern

(TTC) dose below which systemic toxicity would not be expected

  • Genetic Toxicology
  • Must rule out mutagenicity/carcinogenicity concerns
  • Insufficient data in silico analysis of the chemical is warranted

7

Crossing the Threshold - Data Clarifications

slide-8
SLIDE 8

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

  • Acute Toxicology
  • These data tend to only report mortality (eg, LD50 values) and not

morbidity, but they aid in determining the overall potency of a toxicant and are important to the process

  • Multi-Dose Animal Toxicity
  • These data are appropriate to include in every risk assessment
  • Carcinogenicity
  • If available can be of importance in just about every risk assessment,

especially in a chronic exposure situation

  • Irritation and Sensitization
  • Particularly important for parenteral products

8

Crossing the Threshold - Data Clarifications

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

  • Regulatory Guidance Information (eg, OSHA or EPA)
  • While not meant to specifically address the safety of a leachable

impurity, such data (eg, OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits) are valuable since they are calculated by considering a wide range of animal and human safety information

  • Human Toxicity Data
  • The most critical and relevant of all data, but difficult to find!
  • These data greatly strengthen the assessment, and diminish the

uncertainties with cross-species (ie, animal to human) extrapolations

  • Often, if a chemical happens to be a normal constituent of the human

body (eg, an essential mineral), risk can often be assessed by calculating the additional body burden that will result from exposure

9

Crossing the Threshold - Data Clarifications

slide-10
SLIDE 10

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

  • Human safety data are the most relevant, but if not available the

assessment will have to rely on animal work and QSAR

  • Safe doses in animal studies (e.g. NOAEL values) are typically divided

by “safety factors” to enable inter-species data extrapolation

  • eg, a factor of 10 for each unknown parameter
  • Alternatively, some toxicologists calculate a Permitted Daily Exposure

(PDE) value for a chemical based upon the ICH algorithm to estimate a safe dose in humans Ultimately, using all data, the toxicologist must decide if there are sufficient data to support a safety position for potential exposure of humans to the chemical impurity in question

10

Crossing the Threshold - Leveraging Data

slide-11
SLIDE 11

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

Unknown Peak in a Parenteral Dosage Formulation

11

Crossing the Threshold - An Example

slide-12
SLIDE 12

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

  • A parenteral dosage form prescription medication (ie, pre-filled

syringe) with an acute intermittent dosing regimen to inoculate against an infectious disease

  • During stability testing of the product an unknown peak was

detected

  • Peak subsequently identified as benzophenone (CAS #119-61-9)

12

Crossing the Threshold - An Example

O

MW - 182.1 g/mol

slide-13
SLIDE 13

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

  • Benzophenone is a photo-initiator widely used in the food and

pharmaceutical industries for the purpose of UV curing of inks and label coatings applied to product packaging

  • The literature confirms that leaching of this chemical into

pharmaceutical products and food from packaging is not unusual (Fang et al., Amer. Pharm. Rev., 2006)

  • Important consideration from a quality perspective
  • A human parenteral total daily dose of 60 µg/day is calculated for

benzophenone, or 1.2 µg/kg/day for a 50 kg individual

  • This exceeds all 3 PQRI thresholds (ie, 1.5, 5.0 and 50 µg/day)
  • A robust regulatory-ready risk assessment supporting the safety of

this leachable impurity (all endpoints) is needed

13

Crossing the Threshold - An Example

slide-14
SLIDE 14

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

  • Benzophenone was negative in both bacteria and mammalian cell

mutagenicity assays both with and without metabolic activation

  • It is not a mutagen
  • Acute intraperitoneal LD50 value of benzophenone in mice is

reported as 727 mg/kg

  • ~600,000-fold safety margin
  • In a 3-month toxicity study conducted in rats with benzophenone,

the No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level (NOAEL) was 20 mg/kg/day

  • ~17,000-fold safety margin
  • Benzophenone was determined not to be a sensitizer or an irritant in

studies conducted in animals

14

Crossing the Threshold - An Example

slide-15
SLIDE 15

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

  • In carcinogenicity studies conducted in rodents, benzophenone did

not cause carcinogenic effects deemed clearly relevant to humans

  • Collective evidence benzophenone is not a mutagenic carcinogen
  • Consistent with its widespread use and acceptance as both an indirect

food additive and one directly added to food as a flavoring agent

  • One estimate of the of the average intake of benzophenone from

food sources is 330 µg/day

  • As a food additive, the European Food Safety Authority has

calculated a Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) value of 30 μg/kg/day for benzophenone

  • A 25-fold safety margin

15

Crossing the Threshold - An Example

slide-16
SLIDE 16

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

  • In reproductive toxicology studies conducted in animals with

benzophenone, there was no evidence of teratogenicity (rabbits and rats) or adverse affects on fertility (rats)

  • The American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) developed an

8-hour Workplace Environmental Exposure Level (WEEL) of 0.5 μg/L for benzophenone, which would result in a total acceptable daily pulmonary dose of about 69 μg/kg/day for a 50 kg individual in the workplace

(0.5 µg/L x 480 min x 20 L/min ÷ 50 kg x 5 ÷ 7 = 69 µg/kg/day)

  • ~ 58-fold safety margin

16

Crossing the Threshold - An Example

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

“Collectively, as a result of this examination of the available toxicology data for benzophenone, the presence

  • f this leachable in this acute intermittent use parenteral

product is deemed to pose negligible chemical risk to humans under the conditions described in this assessment”

17

Crossing the Threshold - Conclusion

slide-18
SLIDE 18

PQRI PODP E&L Workshop April 18-19, 2018

Douglas J. Ball (Drug Safety Research & Development) Krista Dobo (Drug Safety Research & Development) Pamela Heard (Drug Safety Research & Development) Cindy Magee (Analytical Research & Development) Jessica Whritenour (Drug Safety Research & Development)

18

Acknowledgements