Community Selection Methodology & Governance Approach DESI - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

community selection methodology governance approach
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Community Selection Methodology & Governance Approach DESI - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Community Selection Methodology & Governance Approach DESI Subcommittee Briefing March 6, 2018 Presentation Objectives Increase understanding of the following: Selection Criteria & Model for Best Start Communities Governance


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Community Selection Methodology & Governance Approach

DESI Subcommittee Briefing March 6, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Objectives

Increase understanding of the following:  Selection Criteria & Model for Best Start Communities  Governance Structure for Best Start (2009 – early 2018)  Governance Structure for Best Start (2018 - )

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Place-Based Approach

 First 5 LA will direct its funding to specific target communities  Funding will include direct services and community capacity building activities  Places where children live are strong influencers on their ability to be safe, healthy and ready to learn  Began under FY 2009-2015 Strategic Plan  Renewed Commitment in the FY 2015- 2020 Strategic Plan

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Community Selection Principles

 Data-Driven  High-Need Communities  Prioritize High-Need Communities based on their Strength and Capacity  Respect for Natural Community Boundaries  Representation of Diverse Populations & Regions

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Community Selection Process

Assess Community Need Assess Community Capacity Consider Diversity

Level I, Part 1 Level I, Part 2 Level II Level III Analyzed:

  • BSLA Indicators
  • Birth rate
  • Level of F5LA

investments

Refined analysis by using indicators most supported by available data and/or literature review to identify risk and need (as it pertains to F5LA mission) Key Findings:

  • Need is not consistent

across the county

  • Sup. Districts 1 and 2 had

more high need communities than other districts

Analyzed qualitative data gathered from:

  • F5LA staff focus groups with

program officers

  • Community focus groups
  • Key informant interviews

Analyzed quantitative data gathered on:

  • Infrastructure indicators
  • Investment indicators

Placed communities on a continuum based on capacity 24 high need communities were consolidated to 19 based on focus group feedback Considered community diversity by examining:

  • Distribution of

communities across LA County Sup. Districts

  • Racial/ethnic population

distribution among communities

  • Diverse levels of

capacity

Note: Level 3 is a consideration applied during all levels of the community selection methodology

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Best Start Communities

(2009 - early 2018)

  • 1. Broadway-Manchester
  • 2. Central Long Beach
  • 3. Compton-East Compton
  • 4. East Los Angeles
  • 5. Lancaster
  • 6. Metro LA
  • 7. Northeast Valley
  • 8. Palmdale
  • 9. Panorama City & Neighbors

10.Southeast LA 11.South El Monte/El Monte 12.Watts-Willowbrook 13.West Athens 14.Wilmington

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Partnership Support Structures (2009 – early 2018)

Per Community Countywide

LEAD AGENCY Para los Niños

Metro LA

Palmdale Southeast LA Lancaster Broadway- Manchester Compton- East Compton Central Long Beach West Athens Northeast Valley Panorama City Watts- Willowbrook Wilmington East LA South El Monte/ El Monte

and

1 Community 13 Communities

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A New Structure for Best Start Design Principles

Design Principles

Allows for flexibility & scalability Considers key stakeholder perspectives Fosters collaboration & network building Promotes accountability & efficiency Aligns mission, strategy, and

  • perations
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Design Parameters

First 5 LA a partner, not a doer

Costs reasonable and effective

Not creating new entities

Decisions made in context of First 5 LA’s fiduciary responsibility

Decisions informed by multiple inputs and engagement

Mutual commitment to authentic Partnership

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Geographic Considerations

  • Proximity
  • Supervisorial District
  • Shared Infrastructure
  • Service Planning Area
  • Potential for Cross-

Community Learning

  • Shared History
  • Community Feedback

Parameters:

  • More than one

community per region

  • Manageability within

region

  • Each community within a

region receives the resources they need to support the work

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Best Start Communities

(2018 - )

Region 1: East Los Angeles, South El Monte/El Monte, Southeast LA, Metro LA Region 2: Broadway-Manchester, Compton-East Compton, Watts- Willowbrook, West Athens Region 3: Northeast Valley, Panorama City & Neighbors Region 4: Central Long Beach, Wilmington Region 5: Lancaster, Palmdale

slide-12
SLIDE 12

New Structure: Regional with Local Customization (2018 - )

Metro LA Local Support Network Southeast LA Local Support Network East LA Local Support Network South El Monte/ El Monte Local Support Network

Central-East Regional Network

Supports 4 regional functions with subcontracts to local organizations to fulfill operations and community change work

Learning Coordination and Support Local Resource Management & Mobilization

Org 1 Org 2 Org 3 Org 1 Org 2 Org 1 Org 2 Org 1 Org 2 Org 3

Community Organizing and Advocacy Communications Community Identified Projects Resident Engagement

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Key Considerations for Community Selection & Governance

 Use data to inform decisions  Start with principles and parameters  Include community voice & promote community ownership  Consider size and boundaries of geographic areas  Build on community strengths

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Thank You!