Common Naming Nomenclature A Standard is Needed? No Perfect - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

common naming nomenclature
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Common Naming Nomenclature A Standard is Needed? No Perfect - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Common Naming Nomenclature A Standard is Needed? No Perfect Solution Will any standard be liked by everybody? Will there always be a need for a cheat sheetfor the radio user? Can a database be maintained by: APCO


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Common Naming Nomenclature

A Standard is Needed?

slide-2
SLIDE 2

No Perfect Solution

  • Will any standard be liked by everybody?
  • Will there always be a need for a cheat

sheet…for the radio user?

  • Can a database be maintained by:
  • APCO
  • CAPRAD
  • NPSTC
  • FCC
slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Radios in Question

  • What if there is not a display?
  • What if the display only has 2-3 digits?
  • What if the Display is not alphanumeric?
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Do we need a “mandate” for a

Common Naming Standard Radio?

  • Do we need a minimal standard for a

interoperable radio?

  • 8 character Alpha-Numeric Display
  • 32 channels
  • Narrowband compliant
  • Common CTCSS/DCS tones
  • P25
slide-5
SLIDE 5

What about Local Channels?

  • The standard plan will have to be

expandable to include local, regional and statewide channels.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

How would the database work?

  • The standard approved list would be

cross-indexed with the ability to list local listings for the naming.

  • Allows meaningful additions without

having to change the National Naming Scheme.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Better than no Standard

  • We definitely need to assure

interoperability for the radio user.

  • It needs to programmed into every public

safety radio.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Good and the Bad

  • The good parts of the Standard Plan
  • The missing parts of the Standard Plan
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Anything will be better than nothing…let’s do something!