Color Vision Chapter 5 (Lecture 9) Jonathan Pillow Sensation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

color vision
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Color Vision Chapter 5 (Lecture 9) Jonathan Pillow Sensation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Color Vision Chapter 5 (Lecture 9) Jonathan Pillow Sensation & Perception (PSY 345 / NEU 325) Princeton University, Spring 2019 1 2 3 color vision has evolutionary value lack of color vision black & white 4 Basic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Color Vision

Chapter 5 (Lecture 9)

Jonathan Pillow Sensation & Perception (PSY 345 / NEU 325) 
 Princeton University, Spring 2019

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • color vision has evolutionary value
  • lack of color vision ≠ black & white

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Basic Principles of Color Perception The book says: “Color is not a physical property but a psychophysical property”

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Basic Principles of Color Perception

  • Most of the light we see is reflected
  • Typical light sources: Sun, light bulb, LED screen
  • We see only part of the electromagnetic

spectrum(between 400 and 700 nm). Why??

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Basic Principles of Color Perception

  • Why only 400-700 nm?

Suggestion: unique ability to penetrate sea water

(Pomerantz, Rice U.)

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Basic Principles of Color Perception Q: How many numbers would you need to write down to specify the spectral properties of a light source? A: It depends on how you “bin” up the spectrum

  • One number for each spectral “bin”:

example: 13 bins

5 10 13 20 15 16 17 12

energy

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Basic Principles of Color Perception Device: hyper-spectral camera

  • measures the amount of energy (or number of

photons) in each small range of wavelengths

  • can use thousands of bins (or “frequency bands”)

instead of just the 13 shown here

5 10 13 20 15 16 17 12

energy

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Basic Principles of Color Perception Some terminology for colored light:

5 10 13 20 15 16 17 12

energy

the illuminant - light source spectral - referring to the wavelength of light power spectrum - this curve. Description of the amount of energy (or power) at each frequency

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Basic Principles of Color Perception

energy

an illuminant with most power at long wavelengths (i.e., a reddish light source)

13 measurements of power spectrum (example)

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Basic Principles of Color Perception

energy

an illuminant with most power at medium wavelengths (i.e., a greenish light source)

13 measurements of power spectrum (example)

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Basic Principles of Color Perception

energy

an illuminant with most power at short wavelengths (i.e., a blueish light source)

13 measurements of power spectrum (example)

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Basic Principles of Color Perception

energy

an illuminant with power at all visible wavelengths (a neutral light source, or “white light”)

13 measurements of power spectrum (example)

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Q: How many measurements of this same spectrum does the human eye take (in bright conditions?)

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Q: How many measurements of this same spectrum does the human eye take (in bright conditions?) A: Only 3! One from each cone class

photoreceptor response

420 534 564

S = short (blue) M = medium (green) L = long (red) cone types Color vision: Relies entirely on comparison

  • f responses from three

cone types!

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

420 534 564

absorption spectrum - describes response (or “light absorption”) of a photoreceptor as a function of wavelength

photoreceptor response

could also call this “sensitivity”

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

A single photoreceptor doesn’t “see” color; it gives greater response to some frequencies than others

single cone absorption spectrum

Problem: response from a single cone is ambiguous 10 spikes

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • All the photoreceptor

gives you is a “response”

  • Can’t tell which light

frequency gave rise to this response (blue or

  • range)

single cone absorption spectrum

10 spikes Problem: response from a single cone is ambiguous

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Problem is actually much worse: can’t tell a weak signal at the peak sensitivity from a strong signal at an off-peak intensity

single cone absorption spectrum

spectral power

  • All three of these

lights give the same response from this cone

+2 +1 +0.5

10 spikes cone respone = aborption spectrum x light intensity

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

single cone absorption spectrum

spectral power +2 +1 +0.5

Problem of univariance: infinite set of wavelength+intensity combinations can elicit exactly the same response 10 spikes

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

So a single cone can’t tell you anything about the color of light! Colored stimulus Response of your “S” cones

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

400 450 500 550 600 650 700 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

wavelength energy

240 175 40

cone responses:

Metamers

  • Illuminants that are

physically distinct but perceptually indistinguishable illuminant #1 #2 #3 #4

sensitivity

percept

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

written as a linear matrix equation

(if that’s meaningful to you) = cone responses cone absorption spectra S M L illuminant spectrum

  • cone sensitivities define a 3D subspace of color perception
  • metamers differ only in the null space!

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Implication: many things in the natural world have different spectral properties, but look the same to us. But, great news for the makers of TVs and Monitors: any three lights can be combined to approximate any color.

wavelength energy

illuminant #1 Single-frequency spectra produced by (hypothetical) monitor phosphors Monitor phosphors produce “metameric match” to illuminant #1 (or any other possible illuminant).

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Close-up of computer monitor, showing three phosphors, (which can approximate any light color)

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Spectra of typical CRT monitor phosphors

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

This wouldn’t be the case if we had more cone classes. hyperspectral marvel: mantis shrimp (stomatopod)

  • 12 different cone

classes

  • sensitivity extending

into UV range

  • No surprise that they never invented color TV!

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Real vs. Conterfeit $$ Output of hyper-spectral camera

(colorized artificially)

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

R G B 3 “primary” lights any color can be made by combining three suitable lights... How did they figure this out?

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

James Maxwell: color-matching experiment Given any “test” light, you can match it by adjusting the intensities of any three other lights (2 is not enough; 4 is more than enough)

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Cone responses entirely determine our color percepts: S M L 100 100 100 100 50 100 50 100 50 100 100 100 100 100 100 “non-spectral hues”

  • percept couldn’t be

produced by any single- wavelength light

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Color space: A three-dimensional space that describes all possible color percepts. 
 
 Several ways to describe this space:

  • RGB color space: Defined by the outputs of Long, Medium,

Short wavelength (or R, G, B) lights.

  • HSB color space: Defined by hue, saturation, and brightness

Hue: The chromatic (color) aspect of light Saturation: The chromatic strength of a hue Brightness: The distance from black in color space

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • hue around the edge
  • saturation increasing

from center to edge

  • brightness not shown

2D slice of color space

normalized L response normalized M response

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Color picker

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Trichromatic color vision: 


(Young & Helmholtz theory)


  • three lights needed to make a specific color percept, due

to use of 3 distinct cones with different sensitivities


  • colors uniquely defined by combinations of cone activations

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Late 17th Century: Isaac Newton

“The rays themselves, to speak properly, are not coloured”

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

R O Y G B I V Newton’s Theory: seven kinds of light -> seven kinds of photoreceptor Newton’s Spectrum:

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

L cones: ~60% (red) M cones: ~30% (green) S cones ~10% (blue)

First images of human trichromatic cone mosaic

(Roordra & Wililams, Nature 1999) Notice the variability between individuals!

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

However, this doesn’t quite explain everything

41