clinical genomics Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance Melbourne - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

clinical genomics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

clinical genomics Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance Melbourne - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Digital tools to enable clinical genomics Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance Medical Medical Scientist Masters of Genetic Clinical Health service Workforce Variant Curator Genetic Trainee Clinician CPD


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Digital tools to enable clinical genomics

Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance

2

Medical Specialist Immersion Variant Curator Cross-training Genetic Trainee Projects Medical Scientist curation CPD workshops Clinician CPD workshops Masters of Genomics and Health Genetic Counsellor training Clinical Bioinformatics Bursaries Online CPD modules Health service research workforce Impact of Genomics (x11) Flagship Process (x 11) Flagship Health Economics (x8) Data Sharing Patient preferences, experience & value Impact on Genetic Services Additional Findings Service Baby Beyond Hearing Workforce program Implementation Factors Chromium Technology New Human Genome Reference Build Lab accreditation framework Additional Findings clinical service Additional Findings analysis service Prototype systems Data Access and Release policies and procedures Superbugs report format Implementation Framework Implementation tools (TBD) Requirements & Design Procurement Variant curation tool implementation Clinical Bioinformatics platform implementation Genome Orchestration Service Data Governance Data Security Research Environment Proof of Concept SMART on FHR feasibility study Agnostic pipeline proof of concept Ambassador program Experts-in- residence program Immersion visitor program Dissemination of results: government Stakeholder engagement Community engagement Dissemination

  • f results:

public Support and contribute nationally and internationally

Workforce development Evaluation Innovation & adoption GenoVic Leadership

slide-3
SLIDE 3

GenoVic

Data & Technology

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Common Clinical Genomic Workflow

SEQUENCE DNA COLLECT DNA PERFORM BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS PERFORM CURATION MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM REVIEW GENERATE CLINICAL REPORT

CLINIC LABORATORY CLINIC & LABORATORY

PATIENT RETURN RESULTS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Glacier

Place Order Order Status Get Report View Order Details

FHIR API’s

Lab LIMS VCGS Lab Portal RMH Lab Portal Monash

slide-8
SLIDE 8

LAB

FASTQ FHIR DNA DATA API TRANSFER VCF PREP FHIR

CURATION

GenoVic Full Workflow

VCF REPORT

LAB LTS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Adoption

In Use

  • The Victoria Clinical Genetics Services at the Royal Childrens

Hospital

  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital and the Australian Genome

Research Facility Onboarding

  • Monash Health and the Australian Genome Research Facility

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

User Engagement

Data & Technology

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Product Shortlist

Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance | Supplementary Information Material 11

1 2 3

Open Dialogue Limited RFP

Workshop #1 Product Discovery September 14th- 15th 2016 Workshop #2 Solution Deep Dive September 20th-21st 2016 Workshop #3 Implementation & Operations October 5th-6th 2016 Alliance evaluation and supplier assessment completed October 2016 Limited RFP Issued December 2016 EOI Briefing Session and Info Pack Released August 9th 2016 Alliance evaluation and suppliers shortlist completed August 31st 2016 Product invitation to participate in Open Dialogue September 1st 2016 EOI Supplier Response Due August 22nd 2016 Q&A Closed August 16th 2016

Pre- Qualification (EOI)

Dates may be subject to change

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Variant curation tool selection

  • Pilot – evaluation of each tool’s functionality and usability
  • RFQ – evaluation of written response submitted by vendors

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Evaluation Team members

13 Name Role Organisation Melanie O’Keefe Observer AGRF Thomas Mikeska Observer Austin Mat Wallis Evaluator Austin Dong Anh Khuong Quang Evaluator MCRI Asif Alam Observer Monash Greg Corboy Evaluator Monash Vivien Vasic Observer Monash Kumar Amit Observer Peter Mac Jayamala Pamar Evaluator RMH JP Plazzer Evaluator RMH Manny Sigalas Evaluator RMH Miriam Fanjul Fernandez Evaluator VCGS Sebastian Lunke Evaluator VCGS Dean Phelan Evaluator VCGS Hazel Phillimore Observer VCGS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Summary of variant curation tool pilot

28 scenarios

Evaluated quantitatively for experience and requirements

Qualitative information (comments)

If scenario couldn’t be completed How the tool could be improved Other comments

Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance | Document Name Here 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Scenarios

  • Leveraging Alliance requirements
  • Ensures coverage & consistency
  • Real world processes
  • Scenarios cover
  • System Configuration
  • Quality
  • Assay Setup
  • Variant Filtering
  • Variant Curation
  • Communication

15

Curation Pilot Survey Content

This is a set of scenarios that the Alliance may be using to assess the curation tool in line with the requirements. This can be used to help guide the planning of the training that will be delivered to the assessors.

Singleton Filtering Basic

A single sample is imported with easy to find pathogenic variants. Pre-configured filtering is applied and the relevant variants are marked for curation.
  • 1. Results are imported into the curation tool and are ready for filtering.
  • 2. The user finds the relevant sample to work on.
  • 3. The regions of interest and gene panels are assigned to the sample.
  • 4. QC data is assessed.
  • 5. GAP data is processed.
  • 6. The sample is approved for the variant filtering to proceed.
  • 7. The user reviews the default filtering and is presented with enough information to understand how it works.
  • 8. The default filtering is applied and the variants of interest are identified.
  • 9. Any variants that are not defined correctly are manually corrected (HGVS).
  • 10. The variants are marked as requiring curation.
  • 11. Some variants are marked as not for curation with justification.
  • 12. A manager checks these variants to curate and amends them if required.
  • 13. A final approval is given for the variants of interest and they can now be curated.

Singleton Curation Basic

A single sample with variants that have easily available evidence to support a diagnosis.
  • 1. A sample is ready to be curated with previously approved variants for curation.
  • 2. The user finds this sample and picks the first variant to work on.
  • 3. The user undertakes the curation process where the annotations provided by the curation tool are reviewed.
  • 4. The annotations are weighted and classified into the relevant categories of the curation process (ACMG
guidelines or custom weighting matrix) until there is sufficient evidence for a diagnosis.
  • 5. The documentation for classifying variants is reviewed.
  • 6. Variant specific comments are added and along with reportable comment.
  • 7. The variant is given a proposed classification.
  • 8. A text summarizing all the evidence used for the classification of the variant is added to the variant.
  • 9. The remaining variants are curated until no more are remaining.
  • 10. The sample is marked for a multi-disciplinary team meeting (MDT) to discuss further.
  • 11. After MDT a confirmed classification is added to the variants.
  • 12. These variants are sent to the lab to be confirmed by additional sequencing eg Sanger sequencing if required.
  • 13. The results of the confirmation is recorded if applicable.
  • 14. A summary text considering all the variants for the case is added to the report.
  • 15. The sample is approved for reporting by a manager.

Singleton Filtering Complex

A single sample with difficult to identify pathogenic variants that required manual filtering steps to be undertaken. The target region is expanded. The use of multiple annotations is required to identify variants of interest, eg Clinvar. This is the same process as the basic filtering except for the following:
  • 1. The user adds additional gene panels to the sample to expand the target region.
  • 2. The user adds individual genes to the sample to expand the target region.
  • 3. The user modifies the filtering process to use additional annotations.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Additional Functionality

  • Pilot made clear that software required additional functionality
  • Worked with evaluation team to articulate and prioritise extra

features

  • Critical item were incorporated into a statement of work for the

vendor to deliver

  • Other features incorporated in vendor roadmap

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Benefits

Data & Technology

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Benefits Management

18

Benefit 1: Minimise the cost and waste in administering health care

Benefit 2: Improved patient and family outcomes Benefit 3: Accelerated research and translation into patient care

Increased curation speed Increase in the appropriate use of genomics Availability of genomic data

Information Management

Support improvement in patient outcomes and disease prevention for Victorians through secure and ethical use and sharing of reliable genomic information

Reduction in the number of manual processes Reduction in the duplication of patient data (double handling) Reduction in the ordering of unnecessary and/or duplicate tests Reduction in time and effort associated with finding results Reduction in unnecessary clinical management for patients Increase in detection rates Increase the ease of access to information for clinicians & patients

  • n genomics testing & results

interpretation Reduction in number of systems required to consent for research and clinical care Increased availability of genomic information for future research Increased adoption of research back into clinical practice Increase in the number and /or value of grants using genomics data from Alliance research

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Early benefits

External information integrated into workflow

  • Less manual work as information is centralised and integrated
  • Lower maintenance, easier to update annotations

More efficient curation process

  • Fewer variants to curate. Faster, better, more thorough variant

prioritisation

  • Faster curation and faster second checking

Reuse of curator effort

  • More comprehensive evidence collection
  • More precise gene lists, and gene curation effort not wasted

| Reducing the variant curation bottleneck 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Benefits of data sharing

Sharing curation effort

  • Annotations and reference data is shared by members within

GenoVic

  • Shariant integration - Sharing of curated variants across Australia

Secondary use of genomic data

  • Collection of clinically generated genomic data, consented for

secondary use

  • Will be available for research, methods development, validation

| Reducing the variant curation bottleneck 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Data & Technology, Innovation & Adoption

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Melbourne Genomics – 2016-2019

Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance | Document Name Here 22

Alliance Board

Catherine Walter (Chair) Christine Kilpatrick (RMH) Andrew Stripp (Monash Health) Dale Fisher (PeterMac) Christine Kilpatrick (RCH) Shitij Kapur (UoM) Doug Hilton (WEHI) Kathryn North (MCRI) Rob Grenfell (CSIRO) Irene Kourtis (AGRF) Sue Shilbury (Austin Health) Anna Burgess (DHHS observer)

Executive Management Committee

Clara Gaff (Chair) David Hansen Andrew Sinclair Richard King Julian Clark Felicity Topp Fergus Kerr Peter McDougall Ingrid Winship Sean Grimmond Kirby Siemering Paul Fennessy (DHHS observer)

Advisory Groups

Clinical Adoption Advisory Fergus Kerr (Chair) Cate Kelly Sylvia Metcalfe Don Campbell Lindsay Grayson Margaret Kelaher Noel Cranswick Jayesh Desai Community Advisory Jane Bell (Chair) Louisa Di Pietro Heather Renton Margaret Sahhar Janney Wale Christine Walker Liat Watson Diagnostic Advisory Richard King (Chair) Kirby Siemering Sebastian Lunke Melanie O’Keefe Vivien Vasic Michael Christie Andrew Fellowes Suzanne Svobodova Tony Papenfuss Simon Sadedin Paul James Information Management Advisory/GenoVic Project Control Group David Hansen (Chair) Wayne Mather Rowan Gronlund Kevin Ericksen Tony Papenfuss Michael Carolan Erminia Schiavone Kris Jenkins Mike South Angela Watt Andrew Lonie Clara Gaff Malcolm Smart

Flagships 2016-2018

Congenital Deafness David Amor Lilian Downie Valerie Sung Libby Smith Bibi Gerner Matthew Hunter Kerryn Saunders Natasha Brown Melissa Wake Rachel Burt Jane Halliday Zeffie Poulakis Elizabeth Rose Complex Care in Children Sue White Zornitza Stark Tiong Tan Alison Yeung Matthew Hunter Katrina Harris Dilated Cardiomyopathy Paul James Jay Ramchand Matthew Wallis David Hare Omar Farouque Immunology Jo Douglass Charlotte Slade Vanessa Bryant Jo Smart Sara Barnes Seth Masters Mimi Tang Ingrid Winship Zornitza Stark Lymphoma Stephen Opat Miles Prince Gareth Gregory Michael Dickinson Eliza Hawkes Piers Blombery Solid Cancers Jayesh Desai Kortnye Smith Sophie Beck Dong Anh Khuong Quong Hui Gan Paul Eckert Ben Solomon Ben Markman

Flagships 2017-2019

Bone marrow failure Piers Blombery David Ritchie Francoise Mechinaud Anthea Greeway Andrew Grigg Erica Wood Paddy Barbaro Controlling Superbugs Lindsay Grayson Ben Howden Norelle Sherry Jason Kwong Tony Korman Caroline Marshall Mark Chan Monica Slavin Marcel Leroi Complex neurological Patrick Kwan Sam Berkovic Martin Delatycki Dennis Velakoulis Michael Fahey Melanie Bahlo Rick Leventer Amy Schneider Genetic kidney disease Catherine Quinlan Sue White Zornitza Stark Ella Wilkins Mathew Wallis David Power Kathy Nicholls Peter Kerr Perinatal autopsy George McGillivray Jacqueline Collett Ian Simpson Trishe Leong Jan Pyman Alison Yeung Natasha Brown Sue White Sue Walker

Laboratories

CTP Paul Waring Graham Taylor Tiffany Cowie Sebastian Lunke Renata Marquis-Nicholson Greg Corboy Michael Christie Arthur Hsu VCGS Graham Taylor Damien Bruno Steven Nasioulas Belinda Chong Shannon Cowie Melanie Smith Clare Love Chris Guest AGRF Sue Forrest Kirby Siemering Melanie O’Keefe Matthew Tinning Lavinia Gordon Rust Turakulov Stephen Wilcox

Information Systems

CPIPE / MG LOVD VLSCI Andrew Lonie Simon Sadedin John-Paul Plazzer Charlotte Anderson Anthony Marty Peter Georgeson Michael Milton Juny Kesumadewi Gayle Philips Denis Bauer Harriet Dashnow Guido Grazioli Richard Sinnott Glenn Tesla Clare Sloggett Clinical Systems - MCRI & REDCAP Jane Halliday Susan Donath Leanne Mills Ross Dunn Luke Stephens BIOGRID Maureen Turner Leon Heffer Alice Johnstone

Working Groups

Patient-entered data tool Patient survey Research access Education symposium Evaluation Information requirements Reporting Database users Pipeline platform Curation tool pilot evaluators Curation tool RFQ evaluators Analysis tool user group Curation tool user group Information architecture reference group

Genetic Counsellors Gemma Brett Emma Creed Anna Jarmolowicz Ivan Macciocca Ellie Prawer Giulia Valente Kirsty West Health Economics Khurshid Alam Deborah Schofield Rupendra Shrestha

Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance Program Team

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23