Climate Vulnerability Assessment
Habitats and Species
Clean Water and Climate Adaptation Summit 2010
Minnesota Landscape Arboretum
Ann Pierce MNDNR
Climate Vulnerability Assessment Habitats and Species Clean Water - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Climate Vulnerability Assessment Habitats and Species Clean Water and Climate Adaptation Summit 2010 Minnesota Landscape Arboretum Ann Pierce MNDNR Climate Change Adaptation IPCC: Adjustment in natural or human systems in response to
Clean Water and Climate Adaptation Summit 2010
Minnesota Landscape Arboretum
Ann Pierce MNDNR
IPCC:
Adjustment in natural or human systems in response to actual
harm or exploits beneficial opportunities.
Tallgrass Prairie Eastern Broadleaf Forest Mixed Coniferous Forest
IPCC: (Fussel and Klein, 2006 and Watson et.al. 1966)
“Vulnerability to climate change is the degree to which geophysical, biological and socio-economic systems are susceptible to, and unable to cope with, adverse impacts of climate change.” “…depends not only on a system’s sensitivity, but also on its ability to adapt to new climate conditions”
Conservation Target Evaluate management
Develop management response Implement strategies Evaluate management
Assess CC impacts & vulnerability
Vulnerability Potential impacts Adaption capacity Existing threats Sensitivity Exposure
– Expert Panel approach – Following Massachusetts Approach
– Vulnerability Index – NatureServe – Most obvious first – Priority Species
– What has been done to-date. – Develop draft assessment narrative for each habitat type – Meet with experts to review draft – Edit, amend, add, delete, new thoughts – Back to experts – Complete narrative, assign ranking, apply confidence value – We will likely use (Galatowitsch et.al 2009)
– Makes use off institutional knowledge – Can be done at various scales – Low cost – Can be done relatively quickly – Iterative – Transparent – Process creates staff buy-in
(grazers and browsers, pests, invasives, pathogens)
events (fire, drought, windstorms, floods)
– High Risk of being eliminated from the state – Majority but not all eliminated – No change – Increase – Navel assemblages
confidence
and Schneider for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Assessment Report.
change.
species within a specific geographical area.
climate change.
– May not be suitable for all species
knowledge
State Forests (4,800,000) Wildlife Areas (1,300,000) State Parks (227,000) Natural Areas (183,000) Major Management Areas (acres)
Climate Change impacts and vulnerability
Conservation Targets
management
management response
management and monitoring strategies
Revise
– Game – Non-game – Plant Harvest – Mineral
– Forestry – Fisheries and Wildlife – Ecological Resources
– Parks – Ecological Resources
– Waters – Forestry – Fisheries and Wildlife
Similar to review by Glick et al. (2009)
(From Strategic Conservation Agenda)
Changes in outdoor recreation participation Changes in energy and climate Landscape changes from growth and development
Climate Change impacts and vulnerability
Conservation Targets
management
management response
management and monitoring strategies
Revise SLICE Climate SWAP
multiple components of lakes?
lake status?
Climate Change impacts and vulnerability
Conservation Targets
management
management response
management and monitoring strategies
Revise SLICE Ecological Resources/ Fisheries and Wildlife Climate
Climate Change impacts and vulnerability
Conservation Targets
management
management response
management and monitoring strategies
Revise SLICE Ecological Resources/ Fisheries and Wildlife MCBS LTRM Climate SWAP
Glick et. al 2009. National Wildlife Federation.
Ann pierce ann.pierce@state.mn.us 651-259-5119 Division of Ecological and Water Resources