Characterization of Potential Carbon Sequestration Targets in New York State
Brian Slater1, Alexa Stolorow1, Langhorne Smith1 Kathryn Tamulonis2, John Conrad3
1NY State Museum 2Cornell University 3Conrad Geoscience Corp.
Characterization of Potential Carbon Sequestration Targets in New - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Characterization of Potential Carbon Sequestration Targets in New York State Brian Slater 1 , Alexa Stolorow 1 , Langhorne Smith 1 Kathryn Tamulonis 2 , John Conrad 3 1 NY State Museum 2 Cornell University 3 Conrad Geoscience Corp. CAP ROCK CAP
Brian Slater1, Alexa Stolorow1, Langhorne Smith1 Kathryn Tamulonis2, John Conrad3
1NY State Museum 2Cornell University 3Conrad Geoscience Corp.
CAP ROCK CAP ROCK CAP ROCK CAP ROCK
CAP ROCK
AES Delaney Well ~20 Miles 1634.5’ 1640’
Barron Well
shows that the AES Power Plant lies in what appears to have been a channel during deposition of the Queenston and therefore has a thicker section of the formation.
that the 25 square mile area surround the plant could hold up to 38.5 million tons of CO2 (16 years of output from the AES power plant).
Whiteman #1 well
measurements
2854’ 2841’ 1 mm
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 4 6 8 10 12 Porosity (%) Permeability (md)
2866’
Basal Little Falls Rose Run
6370.5’ 0.5 mm 7100’ 0.5 mm 7070’ 1mm
y = 0.0005e0.8862x 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 2 4 6 8 Porosity at NCS, percent Permeability to Air, millidarcys
Vacuum Dried @ 180F Net Confining Stress: 1200 psi
Sidewall Cores
y = 0.0006e1.1946x y = 0.0018e0.4087x 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 2 4 6 8 10 12 Porosity at NCS, percent Permeability to Air, millidarcys Pilot Samples Conventionals
Conventional Core Plugs
NB-1
(From Schlische et al, 2005) From USGS, 2003 http://3dparks.wr.usgs.gov/nyc/mesozoic/newarkbasin.htm
I-80
From Schlische et al, 2005