changejam 14 James Carlopio BA MA PhD jcarlopio@jmj.com - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
changejam 14 James Carlopio BA MA PhD jcarlopio@jmj.com - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
changejam 14 James Carlopio BA MA PhD jcarlopio@jmj.com jcarlopio@hotmail.com A Master/Mistress Class? Process: All experienced in change management Many discussions Can share ideas, experiences, examples Content: Beyond
A Master/Mistress Class?
Process: § All experienced in change management § Many discussions § Can share ideas, experiences, examples Content: § Beyond ADKAR and Kotter’s 8 steps § Focus on three ‘advanced’ issues/concepts
Change is difficult
Research indicates that 50% to 80% of large IT system implementations, organisational re- engineering (BPR) and change efforts (e.g., cultural, strategic, mergers) fail to deliver promised benefits. Personal change is similarly difficult. Studies show about 50%-60% substance abuse treatment failure rates.
The heart patients’ study …
The Technical Environment
In the 1950's, computer cost per 100,000 multiplications was $1.25, in the 60's it dropped to $0.25, in the early 70's to $0.12, and late 70's to $0.008, ... Moore’s Law Continuous, automated manufacturing process for solar panels; rain generates electricity when it hits piezoelectric materials; Melbourne factory transforming power station waste (co2) into geopolymer ‘green’ concrete Soon: your eyes and pulse will tell me if you are learning; your dreams will be programmable; astronauts will be in Mars orbit; and every thing will eventually ‘talk’ to every
- ther thing.
The Technical Environment
CSIRAC (the CSIROs predecessor) in 1949 built Australia’s first computer: 500-1000Hz 2000 bytes 40m sq 2500 kg 30,000 watts 2000 valves Typical laptop: 3500million Hz 200,000 million bytes 0.1 sq m size 2kg 5-10 watts 1 micro chip about 10-15 million valves
Socio-Political Environment
Every day the world population grows by >200,000 people ... >25 people/second. Urban populations are continuing to grow 3 to 4 times more quickly than rural populations. Critical water shortages leading to personal deprivation and political tensions. The threat of “terror”.
The Competitive Environment
Increasing interdependence and complex, interactive relationships New organisational forms Reduced reaction times Innovation and change (as opposed to high-
volume and low cost) - have become
necessary core strategic competencies for many organisations
The external environment
This is the ‘world’ within which we will be living and working tomorrow, next year and for the foreseeable future. “YES!” there are many drivers in our external environments requiring change, innovation, flexibility, creativity and even transformation.
IT Δ failure often is not an IT problem
85% of IT project failures were due to a lack of communication.
Scott, 2007 – Silence is deadly. Computerworld, Vol 41, #6, p 28
… but the ‘causes’ of change failure are
- internal. Not external!
Strategy implementation problems
Gates (1999); Verweire (2004)
44% 34% 30% 28% 21% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Organization lacked focus Strategy and incentives misaligned Strategy implementation frustrated Employees confused about strategic actions Other problems
Change is difficult
Why is this happening? What are the major internal issues leading to failure? What are the key success factors?
Change is difficult
Since we know all of this (unrealistic goals, poor
measurement, different definitions of success/failure, communication, involvement, planning, decision-making, etc.),
and we have ADKAR and Kotter, why do we still have 50%-80% failure rates?
- 1. Implementation is not just plugging it in
(i.e., implementation installation).
- 2. One-size-fits-all, generic implementation
plans are doomed to failure.
- 3. B = f (P x S)
- 1. Implementation is not just plugging it in
(i.e., implementation installation).
Some of the many elements in an implementation process?
- 2. One-size-fits-all, generic implementation
plans are doomed to failure. B = f (P x S)
Contingent change plans? Contingent on what?
- 2. One-size-fits-all, generic implementation
plans are doomed to failure. B = f (P x S)
At the very least: Structure and Culture Other possibilities: Timing/urgency, skills and experience of those involved, history, labour and industrial-relations climate, industry, type of change (e.g., technical, cultural, performance), motivation/ the why?, size of organisation, size of change, etc.
Organic Processes Flexibility, individuality, spontenaity Mechanistic Processes Control, order, stability Internal Maintenance Smoothing, integration External Positioning Competition, differentiation Type: Clan Culture Dominant attributes: Cohesiveness, participation, teamwork, sense of family Leadership style: Mentor, facilitator, parent-figure Bonding: Loyalty, tradition, interpersonal cohesion Strategic Emphases: Toward developing people, commitment, morale Type: Hierarchy culture Dominant attributes: Order, rules and regulation, uniformity, efficiency Leadership style: Coordinator, organiser, administrator Bonding: Rules, policies and procedures, clear expectations Strategic Emphases: Toward stability, predictability, smooth operations Type: Adhocracy culture Dominant attributes: Creativity, entrepreneurship, adaptability, dynamism Leadership style: Entrepreneur, innovator, risk-taker Bonding: Entrepreneurship, flexibility, risk-taking Strategic Emphases: Toward inovation, growth, new resources Type: Market culture Dominant attributes: Competitiveness, goal achievement, environment exchange Leadership style: Decisive, task-, production- and achievement-oriented Bonding: Goal orientation, production/ service delivery, competition Strategic Emphases: Toward competitive advantage and market superiority
Cameron & Quinn, 1999
Implementation is not just plugging it in (i.e., installation). One-size-fits-all, generic implementation plans are doomed to failure. B = f (P x S)
Behaviour is a function of the person (personality, beliefs, values) interacting with the situation or social environment (culture, structure, physical work environment, etc.)
The Power of the Situation
§ Kurt Lewin: B = f (P x S) § Fundamental Attribution Error
Asch Millgram Zimbardo Langer
Critical Situational Factors
A ‘linker’ bridging the gap in needs and understanding between ‘project people’ and users. Pilot-testing in the early stages. Applying good project management principles. Senior management sponsorship, commitment and involvement. The existence, in a relatively senior position, of an internal champion. Measurement, reward and recognition, acknowledgement.
100 80 60 40 20 74% 83% 97% 52% 44% 55%
Perceived as an industry leader over the past 3 years Financially ranked in the top third of their industry
Last major cultural
- r operational
change judged to be very or moderately successful
Source: :Lingle & Schiemann, 1996
M e a s u r e
- f
S u c c e s s
Measurement-Managed Organizations Non-Measurement- Managed Organizations
1 2 3 3 2 1
1 2 3