Capital Projects
2012 Year-End Review
December 2012
VELCO Main Office – Rutland, VT
Capital Projects 2012 Year-End Review VELCO Main Office Rutland, VT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Capital Projects 2012 Year-End Review VELCO Main Office Rutland, VT December 2012 2012 Capital Projects Capital Program at a Glance VELCO from 1956 to 2005: Built, operated and maintained 586 miles of transmission lines (mostly build
December 2012
VELCO Main Office – Rutland, VT
2
Capital Program at a Glance
VELCO from 1956 to 2005:
(mostly build before 1980’s):
VELCO since 2005:
Based on the Transmission improvements required to maintain the reliability of the system, VELCO established a formal Capital Program to manage its projects including:
As part of this program of work VELCO managed more than $660M in capital investment since 2005. The overwhelming majority of these projects were driven by regional reliability needs and were funded through the regional network service transmission rates as Pool Transmission Facilities (Network Facilities).
Note: 370 Line (345 kV from W. Rutland to New Haven) Note: New Haven Substation Note: Vernon Substation
3
Capital Program & Major Transmission Reinforcements since 2005
Northwest Vermont Reliability Project (2005-2008):
transmission line, 26 miles of 115 kV single pole transmission line.
Lamoille County Project (2009):
Taft Corner, East Avenue, Lime Kiln, Lyndonville (2009-2010):
Southern Loop Coolidge Connector (2010):
4
Capital Program Overview
Project Development Methodology and Continuous Improvement
Area Studies aims to identify deficiencies early
– Completed assessment of all options (T and NTA) to resolve deficiencies – Public meetings and comments provided input to LRP – Provided information for evaluation of Transmission alternatives by ISO-NE
– Landowners – State and Federal Agencies (e.g. DPS, ANR, ACOE)
impacts and accurate cost estimates
– Shortened regulatory review period - MOUs with DPS and ANR on all 248 application since NRP and Lamoille County Projects – Excellent performance against budget
– Project plan and oversight (e.g., effective project controls and contract management) – Improved commissioning process reduced likelihood of system events
– Safety: Jay accident highlights need to enhance safety culture and performance – Scheduling: Improve resource management and work scheduling incorporating all of Velco’s work including operation and maintenance – “Hard Wire” improvements and ensure best practices across entire organization
2012 Active Project Development
Capital Program Portfolio Projects commissioning this year
Projects under construction
Projects in permitting
Projects in planning / development
5
Commissioned Projects Financial & Schedule Review
Project Schedule Performance Review
schedule performance.
Highgate Converter 11/06/2012
E&D & Procurement (Contract 3/19/11) Pre- Const. 2011 -1st Quarter 2011 - 2nd Quarter 2011 - 3rd Quarter 2011 - 4th Quarter 2012 - 1st Quarter 2012 - 2nd Quarter 2012 - 3rd Quarter 2012 - 4th Quarter
Projects In-Service Date
Jay Substation 09/26/2012
Permitting (7 Months) Construction (13 Months)
1/19 7/29 8/1 9/12 9/26
Georgia Station 10/18/2012
Permitting (6 Months) Construction (11 Months)
4/7 10/18 10/21 10/5 10/18 1/16 11/6
Coolidge & Vernon Reactors 12/18/2012
Permitting (7 Months) Construction (11 Months)
3/21 10/14 10/21 12/18 7/22
Construction 36 Sites (38 Months)
10/2009
12/16/2012 Radio Project
12/16
Fiber Deployment 770 Miles (26 Months)
10/2010
12/16/2012 Fiber Backbone Project
12/16
6
Commissioned Projects Financial & Schedule Review
Project Financial Performance Review
transmission network and enhancing Velco’s telecommunication infrastructure. This work was accomplished while maintaining a good financial performance.
compares the value of work completed to the actual cost, or in our case our forecasted cost at completion.
scope creep, and associated cost overruns.
Projects Project Overall Budget Project Forecast Actual vs. Budget Cost Performance Index (EV/AC) Coolidge & Vernon Reactors $15.7M $14.0M (11%) 1.12 Jay Substation $16.8M $13.7M (18%) 1.22 Georgia Station $16.6M $14.6M (12%) 1.13 Highgate Converter $35.6M $29.5M (17%) 1.15 Radio Project $30.7M $26.9M (12%) 1.13 Fiber Backbone $53.2M $47.3M (7%) 0.97 Total $168.6M $146.0M (13%) 1.09
Note: A CPI greater than 1.0 indicates a cost underrun of performance to date
7
Jay Substation Project Highlights
Project Overview
facilities in northern Vermont
alternatives
Note: Jay 115/46 kV Substation
Jay Substation
Quick Facts
8
Significant Accomplishments & Challenges
half, expediting receipt of permits.
seconds to minutes, not hours/days.
presence of existing infrastructure, wetlands, and wetland/streams.
engineering and testing/commissioning resources among
existing infrastructure.
conditions, combining purchase of multiple transformers from a US-based equipment manufacturer, and negotiating favorable construction rates.
Performed RCI, implemented corrective actions, and held safety “summit” with Vermont utilities to share findings and improve safety practices.
Note: Jay Site Work Note: Jay Control Building Construction
Jay Substation Project Highlights
9
Project Description
party contractors, and many distribution utilities for use during regular work, and emergency situations (e.g., power outages or emergency maintenance).
network consisting of wireless communications facilities ("RF Site") located throughout the State.
Statewide Radio Project Highlights
Radio Project
Quick Facts
Location (AVL) mapping
Note: Radio Site Antenna
10 Note: Radio Site Preparation Note: Radio Tower Installation
Statewide Radio Project Highlights
Significant Accomplishments & Challenges
site included condemnation proceedings.
covers the entirety of the State of Vermont.
11
Project Description
system operation while providing a redundant communication path to critical transmission equipment and stations throughout the state.
Smartgrid initiatives across the state and the region. This project also provides a platform for CIP compliance and physical security at remote sites.
Fiber Backbone Project Highlights
Fiber Backbone Project
Quick Facts
Redundancy (Loop)
transmission infrastructure
Telco’s to leverage existing networks
Note: Installing and splicing fiber over the existing transmission network
12 Note: Make ready work on DU’s Infrastructure Note: Fiber Pull Site on VELCO’s Transmission Line
Significant Accomplishments & Challenges
negotiations.
leverage existing infrastructure (Vtel and Sovernet.)
Construction services (Unit based contract).
have an effective deployment.
Fiber Backbone Project Highlights
13
Project Description
electric demand is low and during equipment failure and/or system generator
demand during all conditions without the need to run expensive generation.
Coolidge and Vernon Project Highlights
Note: 345kV Reactor On Site
Reactor Projects
Quick Facts
TOV
14
Significant Accomplishments & Challenges
controls
Coolidge and Vernon Project Highlights
Note: 345kV Reactor Transportation
15
Project Description
concerns, which included a lack of redundancy and reliability problems associated with the existing Georgia station bus design.
violations, voltage collapse or instability, or thermal overloads and would have resulted in extended outages in northwest Vermont.
Georgia Station Project Highlights
Note: Georgia Switching Station
Georgia Switching Station
Quick Facts
Bus Design
16
Significant Accomplishments & Challenges
secure the site at a reasonable cost.
subsequent receipt of permits, including CPG.
transferring 4 critical 115 kV transmission lines to the new station. Worked closely with local utilities to coordinated outage work which took place during low load periods (weekends & nights).
minimize impact to the transmission network in Northwest Vermont. Implemented risk mitigation measures to minimize possible impacts to IBM associated with K-21 cutover to the new station.
full commissioning of the station to coordinate with
Georgia Station Project Highlights
Note: Georgia Station Bus Work Note: Georgia Station Cable Trench
17
Project Description
an additional 25 to 30 years.
refurbishment project.
system, upgrades to the existing thyristor valves to ensure reliability, upgrade to the valve cooling system, addition of transformer monitoring upgrades, the replacement of the smoothing reactor, as well as the replacement of the existing 480V Station Service Breakers.
Highgate Converter Project Highlights
Highgate Converter
Quick Facts
HQ TransEnergie and ISO-NE
Commissioning
Note: Highgate Converter Station
18
Significant Accomplishments & Challenges
(HJO), Hydro-Québec TransEnergie, ISO New England and Department of Energy.
facilities, install new equipment and perform commissioning and testing activities. Outage request was put in place 18 months in advance and lasted from 10/7/12 to 11/6/12.
involving highly technical and complex commissioning work; 75 workers on site on double shift with 24/7 work activities.
including conducting the 7-day test plan scheduled by the hour.
transaction schedules to be put in place for all testing activities; close coordination with ISO-NE, HJO and Velco Power Accounting group.
Highgate Converter Project Highlights
Note: Cooling Control Interface & Fan Controls Note: Work Location Highlighted
19
Highgate Converter Project Highlights
Note: New Cooling System Interior Equipment Note: New Cooling Tower’s Fans Note: New Operator Control Main Displays
20
Highgate Converter Project Highlights
Note: Valve Group Note: DC Smoothing Reactor Note: Cap PT’s Note: Main Transformer
21
Capital Program Summary
Capital Program over the last 5 years:
by FERC, NERC and NPCC and implemented by ISO-NE across the New England.
collaborating closely with Distribution Utilities.
Capital Program over the next 5 years:
Range System Plan.
period (e.g., Highgate converter controls upgrade). Similarly, on the transmission lines, concerns about aging structures and potential impacts (.e.g., pole fire on the K-24 affecting IBM) have raised the importance of establishing the structure condition improvement program.
permitting and engineering efforts.