Cancer control in Aotearoa New Zealand Dr Bev Lawton, Dr Tony - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cancer control in aotearoa new zealand dr bev lawton dr
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Cancer control in Aotearoa New Zealand Dr Bev Lawton, Dr Tony - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cancer control in Aotearoa New Zealand Dr Bev Lawton, Dr Tony Blakely, Dr Sara Filoche UICC Sept 2012 Womens Health Research Centre University of Otago Wellington Travel funded by an education grant from CSL Overview Cancer Control


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Cancer control in Aotearoa New Zealand

Dr Bev Lawton, Dr Tony Blakely, Dr Sara Filoche UICC Sept 2012

Women’s Health Research Centre University of Otago Wellington Travel funded by an education grant from CSL

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

  • Cancer Control in Aotearoa
  • Inequalities for Maori
  • Barriers to equitable health
  • 2 case studies
  • Last thoughts
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Health System

  • Largely free Public system runs

concurrently with a private fee for service system

  • There is substantial input of NGO’S in the

cancer health sector

slide-4
SLIDE 4

NZ Cancer Control Strategy

  • Two purposes:
  • 1. To reduce the impact of cancer
  • 2. To reduce inequalities in the impact of cancer
  • Six Goals:
  • 1. Primary Prevention
  • 2. Screening and early detection
  • 3. Diagnosis and treatment
  • 4. Support, rehabilitation and palliation
  • 5. Delivery of services (workforce, Māori, consumer)
  • 6. Research and surveillance
slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Independent, reporting to and advising the

Minister

  • Five terms of reference:
  • Monitor and evaluate implementation of CCS
  • Independent strategic advice
  • Foster collaboration in sector
  • Foster and support best practice
  • Maintain international linkages
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Inequalities for Māori

  • Māori are the Indigenous people of New

Zealand and make up 15% of the population

  • Māori adults have 19% higher rate of

diagnosis of cancer than non-Māori and a 78% higher risk of death from cancer

  • More likely to be diagnosed at a later stage.

Stage does not account for all inequalities

  • (Robson, Purdie, & Cormack, 2010)
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Source: Soeberg, Blakely, Sarfati et al. 2012. Ethnic and socioeconomic trends in cancer survival, New Zealand, 1991-2004

  • 40%
  • 30%
  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Oesophagus Testis Cervix Uterus Kidney Melanoma Prostate Head, neck and larynx Breast (female) Colorectum POOLED ESTIMATE Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma Liver Lung Stomach Leukaemia Hodgkin's lymphoma Pancreas Ovary Bladder Brain Thyroid gland Percentage difference

Non-Māori have poorer survival Māori have poorer survival

Bad news: Percentage difference in cancer excess mortality between Māori :non-Māori, patients diagnosed 1991-2004

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Figure 1: Cancer registration and death age-standardised rates by deprivation decile 2002-2006 (from Robson et al 2010)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Breast cancer incidence rates by ethnicity

Breast cancer mortality rates by ethnicity

NZCMS and CancerTrends (Incidence) findings

Suggestion survival gaps widening faster than incidence gaps

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Inequities are differences which are

  • Unfair
  • Avoidable
  • Fixable
  • Privilege
slide-11
SLIDE 11

System/ Provider are the problem not the patient

Eliminate Victim Blaming approach

“Maori are more likely to die of cancer because they have cultural problems” “eating problems, self control problems, smoking problems, genetic problems, . . too shy, too lazy, fatalistic”. “Then they present late, don’t take their meds”

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Triple A Q

  • Available
  • Accessible
  • Appropriate
  • Quality
  • Apples and pears
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Case study 1

  • Rural, coastal, 90 % Maori community in

the Eastern Bay of Plenty (220Km)

  • Participation rate in mammography

increased from 45% in 2003 to about 98% in both 2005 and 2007.

  • Breast Screen Aotearoa
  • Mobile breast screening unit

Thomson NZMJ 2009

slide-14
SLIDE 14

How did they improve access

  • Te Whānau ā Apanui Community Health

Service (‘TWAACH’, ‘the Service’)

  • Increased local involvement
  • Consulted community re barriers
  • Facilitated the provision of information about

and promotion of breast screening,

  • Improved the identification of eligible

women, and

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Changing the system

  • Clinic took over enrolments and

appointments

  • Group bookings and transport
  • Master list on the wall of surgery
  • Champions
  • Active promotion at community events,

store pub

  • Cup of Tea, a small gift
slide-16
SLIDE 16

HPV vaccination program

  • Use of a Maori Equity Advisory Group

(MEAG) as an equity tool

  • Input at multiple levels- program policy,

implementation plans and media

  • Issues :Community consultation and

financial drivers

  • Rates of vaccination high for Maori

compared to European 65% vs 46%

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Conclusion

  • Significant inequalities in Cancer exist

in New Zealand

  • The gaps may be widening
  • Innovative programs are being

undertaken

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Last thoughts

  • Indigenous Community involvement at

the beginning

  • Eliminate the silence –put indigenous

health upfront from policy to the cliff face

  • Racism
  • Champions
slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Globally we need to make make the

case that prioritising the health of indigenous peoples is cost effective

  • Call to action – we need to be visible

with our messages as our people are dying

slide-20
SLIDE 20

He aha te mea nui o tenei ao? Maku e kii atu, He tangata, he tangata, he tangata!

You ask what is the most important thing in this world? I will tell you: It is people, it is people, it is people!

Kia Ora Thank-you Bev.Lawton@otago.ac.nz