Camiros National Practice Zoning Ordinances Sustainable Development - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
camiros national practice
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Camiros National Practice Zoning Ordinances Sustainable Development - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aug 15, 2022 119 likes •458 views

Camiros National Practice Zoning Ordinances Sustainable Development Master Plans Downtown Plans Corridor Plans Urban Design Economic Development Public Engagement Landscape Architecture Historic Preservation Camiros Zoning Practice

slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Camiros National Practice

Zoning Ordinances Sustainable Development Master Plans Downtown Plans Corridor Plans Urban Design Economic Development Public Engagement Landscape Architecture Historic Preservation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Camiros Zoning Practice

Baltimore, MD Buffalo, NY Clark County (Las Vegas), NV Davenport, IA Knoxville, TN New Orleans, LA Newark, NJ Pittsburgh, PA Providence, RI Rome, NY Trenton, NJ Salt Lake Co., UT Shreveport, LA Spring Hill, TN Yonkers, NY

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Baltimore Maryland

Zoning Code Update Integrate URPs – 80+ URPs Rowhouse form-based standards Infill: Stable vs. High Vacancies Downtown form-based subdistricts New TOD Districts Urban vs. Suburban

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Pittsburgh Pennsylvania

Riverfront Zoning Amendment 35 miles of riverfront Different character throughout geography: 5 subdistricts Riverfront access: View corridors Building passages Physical access to riverfront Increased density Reduced reliance on vehicles

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Buffalo New York

City-Wide Form-Based Code GREEN CODE Form-based zones Neighborhood Zones District Zones Corridor Zones Building Typologies in N Zones TOD District: C-M Metro Rail

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Buffalo New York

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Buffalo New York

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Buffalo New York

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Buffalo New York

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Buffalo New York

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Buffalo New York

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Charlotte TOD

Districts Formerly Known As Intent Applicability TOD-H1 High Intensity TOD-A Urban centers Rapid transit centers Streetcar for City Center & large sites in activity centers ½ mile walking distance of existing station

  • r funded MTC/CATS alignment station

location TOD-H2 High Intensity Transitional TOD-B Transition from high intensity to adjacent neighborhoods Streetcar alignments 1 mile walking distance of existing station or adopted MTC/CATS alignment station location TOD-M1 Moderate Intensity TOD-C Transit outside of urban centers Streetcar for large sites in activity centers ½ mile walking distance of existing station

  • r adopted MTC/CATS alignment station

location TOD-M2 Moderate Intensity Transitional TOD-D Transition from moderate intensity to adjacent neighborhoods More suburban in nature 1 mile walking distance of existing station or adopted MTC/CATS alignment station location

* Adjacent to single-family residential only when separated by separated by an interstate, parkway, boulevard, or a four or more lane avenue ** Any portion of a structure within 200 of single-family residential district limited to 65’ in height

slide-14
SLIDE 14

TOD Form

Emphasize form in each Building dimensions Building siting Building height Required height stepback Building articulation Different levels of development intensity & transitions

  • Min. and max. heights

Stricter design standards Transitions Frontage types Based on street type: local, Main Street, 4+ lane avenue, limited access

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TOD Form

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

TOD Form

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

TOD Form

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

TOD Form

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

TOD Form

Height bonuses Open space Transportation Affordable housing Design standards Façade articulation Massing Entries + Parking Structures

+ Additional form & design standards for lower-intensity dwellings

slide-26
SLIDE 26

TOD Streetscape

Sidewalk & Amenity Zone Determined by street type Will have applicability by district Minimum dimensions Pedestrian Connectivity Refinement of current ordinance regulations

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

TOD Use

Special use eliminated Use matrix only permitted uses All uses defined Generic use approach Prescribed conditions Why not just list prohibited uses?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

TOD Administration

Administrative Adjustment Planning Director Proposed 10% modification to a quantitative standards Alternative Compliance Determining “how” without quasi-judicial process Alternative compliance to more qualitative standards TOD-___-EX Cite base district in name Similar to TOD-Optional Public benefit as part of the process

slide-30
SLIDE 30

TOD Site Elements

Parking No minimum in TOD-H1/-M1 Maximums in all districts Bicycle parking Signs Determining appropriate signs in TOD (pedestrian-oriented) Scaled to district form Landscape Parking lot perimeter Buffer yard

slide-31
SLIDE 31

TOD A Bigger Picture…

Foundation Sets a course for full UDO Establishes graphic style Key Parts of UDO Use approach Form criteria Note: The order presented in previous hand-out is not the final order of standards Less emphasis on use More emphasis on form & character

slide-32
SLIDE 32