c c NSO IDN WG sub-gr oup 3 c r oss-ove r issue s Mar c h, 2007 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

c c nso idn wg sub gr oup 3 c r oss ove r issue s
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

c c NSO IDN WG sub-gr oup 3 c r oss-ove r issue s Mar c h, 2007 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

c c NSO IDN WG sub-gr oup 3 c r oss-ove r issue s Mar c h, 2007 Minjung Par k(.kr ) T he Goal of Sub-gr oup 3 T o ide ntify c r oss-ove r issue s ar ising fr om the intr oduc tion of IDNs at the top le ve l inc luding ne w gT


slide-1
SLIDE 1

c c NSO IDN WG sub-gr

  • up 3

c r

  • ss-ove r

issue s

Mar c h, 2007 Minjung Par k(.kr )

slide-2
SLIDE 2

T he Goal of Sub-gr

  • up 3

T

  • ide ntify c r
  • ss-ove r

issue s ar ising fr

  • m the intr
  • duc tion
  • f IDNs at the top le ve l inc luding ne w gT

L Ds (c c NSO IDN WG Char te r )

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cr

  • ss-ove r

Issue s on IDNs at the T

  • p L

e ve l

Applic ation (Str

ing, Re gistr y se le c tion) c r ite r ia of IDN T L Ds in ne w gT L D pr

  • c e ss

– Should the same se le c tion c r

ite r ia be applie d to asc ii and IDN T L Ds in the ne w gT L D r

  • unds?

< Ne w gT L D e valuation pr

  • c e ss >

– Pr

e liminar y e valuation stage the applic ation will be appr

  • ve d if :
  • Applic ation me e ts obje c tive te c hnic al, busine ss c r

ite r ia

  • T

e c hnic al stability is assur e d

  • Str

ing is not a r e se r ve d name

  • Str

ing is not c onfusingly similar to e xisting or pr

  • pose d

str ing

  • T

he r e ’s no str ing c onte ntion

  • No for

mal obje c tion is r aise d

slide-4
SLIDE 4

– If not, what should be an additional se t of

applic ation c r ite r ia(r e quir e me nts) for IDN T L Ds in the ne w gT L D r

  • unds?
  • Should the applic ant be r

e quir e d to de monstr ate br

  • ad-

base d suppor t fr

  • m the loc al language c ommunity? (GNSO

IDN WG’s F inal R e por t )

  • If ye s, how to de te r

mine the loc al language c ommunity? – In some c ase s it would be r

e lative ly e asy to de fine the c or r e sponding loc al language c ommunity(i.e . one language :

  • ne c ountr

y(or te r r itor y), whe r e as it may not be so e asy for

  • the r

s(i.e . multiple language : multiple c ountr y(or te r r itor ie s))

  • Should the r

e be a c onsultation pr

  • c e ss with c c NSO and

possibly the GAC?

  • How do we inc or

por ate the c onsultation pr

  • c e ss within the

ne w gT L Ds pr

  • c e ss?
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Cr

  • ss-ove r

Issue s on IDN at the T

  • p L

e ve l

Re se r

ve d ge ogr aphic al & ge opolitic al name s

all ge ogr aphic & ge opolitic al name s in the ISO 3166-1 list (e .g.Por tugal, India, Canada) & name s of te r r itor ie s, distinc t ge ogr aphic and ge opolitic al name s as ICANN may dir e c t fr

  • m time to time

– GNSO IDN WG F

inal Re por t(’07.3) : 4.1.2. GAC Consultation on Ge o-politic al Impac t:

  • Agr

e e me nt that, within the pr

  • c e ss for

ne w gT L D c onside r ation, the pr

  • c e ss for

de te r mining whe the r a str ing has a ge o-politic al impac t is a c halle nge , and that GAC c onsultation may be ne c e ssar y but may not pr

  • vide c ompr

e he nsive r e sponse s.

– Should the c c NSO be inc lude d within the c onsultation

pr

  • c e ss on r

e se r ve d ge ogr aphic al and ge opolitic al name s?

  • If so, what would be the suitable c onsultation

pr

  • c e ss? Jointly wor

king with the GAC and r e le vant language c ommunity?

  • Should the c onsultation pr
  • c e ss be made pr

ior to applic ation? Or dur ing applic ation pr

  • c e ss?
slide-6
SLIDE 6

GNSO IDN WG F inal Re por t

  • 4.1.2. GAC Consultation on Ge o-politic al Impac t:
  • Agr

e e me nt that, within the pr

  • c e ss for

ne w gT L D c onside r ation, the pr

  • c e ss for

de te r mining whe the r a str ing has a ge o-politic al impac t is a c halle nge , and that GAC c onsultation may be ne c e ssar y but may not pr

  • vide c ompr

e he nsive r e sponse s.

  • 4.1.3. L

anguage Community Input for E valuation of ne w IDN gT L D Str ings:

  • Agr

e e me nt that a suitable pr

  • c e ss for

c onsultation, inc luding with r e le vant language c ommunitie s, is ne e de d whe n c onside r ing ne w IDN gT L D str

  • ings. 4.2.10

In r e fe r e nc e to the de ve lopme nt of a suitable pr

  • c e ss for

c onsultation (Se e pr e vious se c tion on “Agr e e me nt that a suitable pr

  • c e ss for

c onsultation, inc luding with r e le vant language c ommunitie s, is ne e de d whe n c onside r ing ne w IDN gT L D str ings”); Suppor t for a suitably c onve ne d language c ommitte e , fair ly r e pr e se nting the ge ogr aphic distr ibution of the r e spe c tive language c ommunity wor ldwide , to r e vie w the se le c tion/ adoption of an IDN gT L D str ing in that par tic ular language .

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ne w gT L D e valuation pr

  • c e ss

Pr

e liminar y e valuation stage the applic ation will be appr

  • ve d if :

– Applic ation me e ts obje c tive te c hnic al, busine ss c r

ite r ia

– T

e c hnic al stability is assur e d

– Str

ing is not a r e se r ve d name

– Str

ing is not c onfusingly similar to e xisting or pr

  • pose d

str ing

– T

he r e ’s no str ing c onte ntion

– No for

mal obje c tion is r aise d Issue s r

aise d in the pr e liminar y e valuation may be r e solve d in an e xte nde d e valuation pr

  • c e dur

e c har ac te r ise d by a se t of dispute r e solution pr

  • c e ss