An Interesting Story of Gamma-Ray Bright AGNs by the iMOGABA and … AiMOGABA
(A KVN Key Science Program)
Sang-Sung Lee (KASI) and the iMOGABA team
2018 September 6 East Asia VLBI Workshop Pyeoung Chang
by the iMOGABA and AiMOGABA (A KVN Key Science Program) Sang-Sung - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
An Interesting Story of Gamma-Ray Bright AGNs by the iMOGABA and AiMOGABA (A KVN Key Science Program) Sang-Sung Lee (KASI) and the iMOGABA team 2018 September 6 East Asia VLBI Workshop Pyeoung Chang :
(A KVN Key Science Program)
2018 September 6 East Asia VLBI Workshop Pyeoung Chang
– Strong broad emission line in NGC 1068 (Fath 1909) – Jet in M87 (Curtis 1918):
apparently connected with the nucleus by a thin line of matter
M87 (Virgo)
출처: http://server7.wikisky.org/snapshot? img_size=&img_res=&ra=12.5138&de=12.3896&angle=0.0293&projection=tan& rotation=0.0&survey=astrophoto&img_id=905632&width=2160&height=2160 &img_borders=&interpolation=bicubic&jpeg_quality=0.8
Spectrum of NGC 1068
http://homework.uoregon.edu/pub/class/321/sspher.html
Graphic courtesy of Marie-Luise Menzel (MPE) Blazars… Doppler boosted, violent
(Angel & Stockman 80)
75 % are blazars
Ajello+17
: Down stream the relativistic jets? (e.g., an orphan flare) : much inner region of the jets? (e.g., radio counter part time-lagged)
: A relativistic jet of high energy plasma (e.g., Marscher et al. 2008) : Doppler boosting of synchrotron radiation of the jet (e.g., Dermer 1995) : Inverse Compton scattering by relativistic electrons
– radio polarization light curves after a gamma-ray flare of 32 AGNs – dense monitoring at 22, 43, 86 (129) GHz – weekly monitoring for 3-4 months – Lee et al. 2013, Kang et al. 2015, JKAS, 48, 257 (Case study for 3C 279)
– Monthly VLBI monitoring of the MOGABA sources (~34) – correlated flux of inner-jet structure after gamma-ray flare – Multi-freq. (22/43/86/129GHz) monitoring – Requirement: accurate amplitude calibration with careful Tsys measurements (antenna gain measurement every hour) – Lee et al. 2016, ApJS, 227, 8 (Project overview and single-epoch results)
– Do-Young Byun (MOGABA data reduction pipeline) – Jeffrey Hodgson (iMOGABA data reduction pipeline, 3C84) – Sincheol Kang (MOGABA observations/data reduction, iMOGABA data reduction,1156+295) – Jeong-Sook Kim (CygX-3) – Sang-Hyun Kim (MOGABA observations/data reduction, iMOGABA data reduction, CTA102) – Soon-Wook Kim (CygX-3) – Jee Won Lee (iMOGABA data reduction, 0716+714/OJ287) – Sang-Sung Lee (PI) – Kiyoaki Wajima (iMOGABA data reduction, faint AGNs) – Guangyao Zhao (iMOGABA with frequency phase transfer)
– Juan-Carlos Algaba-Marcos (iMOGABA data reduction, 1633+382) – Dae-Won Kim (iMOGABA data reduction, BL Lac/1749+096) – Jongho Park (iMOGABA data reduction, 1510-089) – Sascha Trippe (bright AGNs)
– Sung-Min Yoo (iMOGABA data reduction, 3C 279)
– Motoki Kino (bright AGNs)
– Jae-Young Kim (iMOGABA data reduction, M87)
including 6 students + 5 postdocs
– First detection of 350 micron polarization of 3C 279 (Lee et al. 2015, ApJL) – iMOGABA II: Frequency Phase Transfer (Algaba et al., 2015 JKAS, 14 citations) – Amplitude correction factors of KVN (Lee et al. 2015 JKAS, 14 citations) – Polarization monitoring of 3C 279 (Kang et al. 2015 JKAS, 7 citations) – The KVN Pipeline (Hodgson et al. 2016 JKAS, 9 citations) – Detection of mm polarization IDV of S5 0716+714 (Lee et al. 2016 A&A Letter) – iMOGABA I: Single-epoch imaging results (Lee et al. 2016 ApJS) – Proving the gamma-ray IDV in 3C279 (Rani et al. 2017 MNRAS) – iMOGABA : S5 0716+714 (Lee et al. 2017 ApJ) – iMOGABA : BL Lac (Dae-Won Kim et al. 2017 JKAS, 3 citations) – iMOGABA : 1633+382 I (Algaba et al. 2018 ApJ) : highlights – iMOGABA : FPT2 (Zhao et al. 2018 AJ) : highlights – iMOGABA : 3C 84 (Hodgson et al. 2018 MNRAS) : highlights – iMOGABA : M87 (Jae-Young Kim et al. 2018 A&A Letter) : highlights – iMOGABA : 1633+382 II (Algaba et al. 2018 ApJ) – iMOGABA : 1749+096 (Dea-Won Kim et al. 2018 MNRAS)
– First detection of 350 micron polarization of 3C 279 (Lee et al. 2015, ApJL) – iMOGABA II: Frequency Phase Transfer (Algaba et al., 2015 JKAS, 14 citations) – Amplitude correction factors of KVN (Lee et al. 2015 JKAS, 14 citations) – Polarization monitoring of 3C 279 (Kang et al. 2015 JKAS, 7 citations) – The KVN Pipeline (Hodgson et al. 2016 JKAS, 9 citations) – Detection of mm polarization IDV of S5 0716+714 (Lee et al. 2016 A&A Letter) – iMOGABA I: Single-epoch imaging results (Lee et al. 2016 ApJS) – Proving the gamma-ray IDV in 3C279 (Rani et al. 2017 MNRAS) – iMOGABA : S5 0716+714 (Lee et al. 2017 ApJ) – iMOGABA : BL Lac (Dae-Won Kim et al. 2017 JKAS, 3 citations) – iMOGABA : 1633+382 I (Algaba et al. 2018 ApJ) : highlights – iMOGABA : FPT2 (Zhao et al. 2018 AJ) : highlights – iMOGABA : 3C 84 (Hodgson et al. 2018 MNRAS) : highlights – iMOGABA : M87 (Jae-Young Kim et al. 2018 A&A Letter) : highlights – iMOGABA : 1633+382 II (Algaba et al. 2018 ApJ) – iMOGABA : 1749+096 (Dae-Won Kim et al. 2018 MNRAS)
Student (UST) Student (SNU) Student (SNU)
Student (SNU)
– iMOGABA : Core-blending effect I (Algaba et al. JKAS special issue 2018)
– iMOGABA : Evaluation of imaging quality (Wajima et al. JKAS) – iMOGABA : 1156+295 (Kang et al. ApJ) : See the poster by Kang, Sincheol – iMOGABA : OJ 287 (Lee et al. ApJ) : See the poster by Lee, Jee Won – iMOGABA : Core-blending effect II (Lee et al.) – iMOGABA : Variability time scales (Lee et al.) – iMOGABA : 1510-089 (Park et al. ApJ) – MOGABA : S5 0716+714 (Kang et al. ApJ) – MOGABA : 3C 454.3 (Lee et al. ApJ) – MOGABA : Multi-frequency Polarization Survey (MFPOL) (Lee et al. ApJ) – iMOGABA : CTA 102 (Kim et al. ApJ) – iMOGABA : 3C 279 (Yoo et al. ApJ)
Student (UST) Student (SNU) Student (UST) Student (UST) Student (CNU)
Zhao et al. 2018, AJ
FPT-square (cf. FPT=Frequency Phase Transfer)
– implementing a further phase transfer between two FPT residuals (i.e., calibrating dispersive effect) – Increase the coherence time up to 8 hr (i.e., much higher sensitivity)
FPT-square can help to detect/image sources at high (>43 GHz) frequencies
– Successfully performed with iMOGABA – Suitable also for high frequency all-sky survey (e.g., MASK) phase solution after FPT
phase solution after FPT-square
Dae-Won Kim et al. 2017, JKAS
We observed BL Lacertae
variability
(a sad orphan flare) A sad orphan flare might occur due to inverse Compton scattering by seed photons from e.g., a jet sheath (ring of fire model)
https://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssc/data/ access/lat/msl_lc/source/BL_Lac
KVN images
Dae-Won Kim et al. 2017, JKAS
https://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssc/data/ access/lat/msl_lc/source/BL_Lac
We observed BL Lacertae
variability
(a sad orphan flare) A sad orphan flare might occur due to inverse Compton scattering by seed photons from e.g., a jet sheath (ring of fire model)
KVN images
Dae-Won Kim et al. 2017, JKAS
We observed BL Lacertae
A sad orphan flare might occur due to inverse Compton scattering by seed photons from e.g., a jet sheath (ring of fire model)
Highlight 3. A Gamma-ray Flare offset from the Radio Emitting Regions Algaba et al. 2018, ApJ We observed 1633+382
significantly correlated
about 70 days (i.e., 40 pc)
radio emitting regions by 40 pc A happy correlated flare might occur in the inner regions of the jet, due to a shock propagating a radio emitting regions.
Algaba+ submitted
Highlight 3. A Gamma-ray Flare offset from the Radio Emitting Regions Algaba et al. 2018, ApJ We observed 1633+382
significantly correlated
about 70 days (i.e., 40 pc)
radio emitting regions by 40 pc A happy correlated flare might occur in the inner regions of the jet, due to a shock propagating a radio emitting regions.
Highlight 3. A Gamma-ray Flare offset from the Radio Emitting Regions Algaba et al. 2018, ApJ We observed 1633+382
significantly correlated
about 70 days (i.e., 40 pc)
radio emitting regions by 40 pc A happy correlated flare might occur in the inner regions of the jet, due to a shock propagating a radio emitting regions.
Hodgson et al. 2018, MNRAS
We observed 3C 84
correlated with flux from C3
correlated with flux from C3
Hodgson et al. 2018, MNRAS
We observed 3C 84
correlated with flux from C3
Hodgson et al. 2018, MNRAS
We observed 3C 84
Hodgson et al. 2018, MNRAS
We observed 3C 84
correlated with flux from C3
Jae-Young Kim et al. 2018, A&A Letter
We observed M87
Jae-Young Kim et al. 2018, A&A Letter
We observed M87
inhomogeneous multi-energy components
to short millimeter wavelengths implies a strong magnetization in the jet
Jae-Young Kim et al. 2018, A&A Letter
We observed M87
correlated with flux from C3
implies a strong magnetization in the jet
Mrk 421
Revealing a correlation with a wandering core and its B-field variation
– HE or VHE event may affect opacity of the jets (ne, geometry, etc.) – B-field may change due to propagation of any shock by the event
2015 April, aiming at studying the origins of the gamma-ray flares in the radio-loud AGNs, and using a data reduction pipeline with FPT technique.
– the gamma-ray flares may have sometimes no radio counterparts (orphan flares), indicating the flares might occur due to inverse Compton scattering by seed photons from e.g., a jet sheath (ring of fire model) – they may occur in the inner regions of the jet, due to a shock propagating a radio emitting regions, showing strong cross correlation with radio light curves. – they may occur both regions (i.e., in the inner jet and downstream the jet) of an individual AGN