Butler robot for older adults: the Robadom project End-users - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

butler robot for older adults the robadom project end
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Butler robot for older adults: the Robadom project End-users - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Butler robot for older adults: the Robadom project End-users point of view Pr. Anne-Sophie Rigaud Hpital Broca, AP-HP & EA 4468, Paris Descartes University Valoria, Bretagne Sud University ISIR, Pierre et Marie Curie University


slide-1
SLIDE 1

« Butler» robot for older adults: the Robadom project End-users’ point of view

  • Pr. Anne-Sophie Rigaud

Hôpital Broca, AP-HP & EA 4468, Paris Descartes University Valoria, Bretagne Sud University ISIR, Pierre et Marie Curie University Robosoft

TECSAN ANR-09-TECS-012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris University Paris Descartes- LUSAGE Lab

Fundings France Alzheimer (2009- 2011)

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Technologies matching the needs of
  • lder adults with cognitive

impairment

  • Provide therapy and cognitive

prothesis

  • Increase social link
  • Train carers and alleviate their

burden

  • Facilitate life at home

Our aims

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Social robots: state of the art

  • Robots for older adults:

– Assistant, companion

(Sharkey and Sharkey, 2010)

– Facilitating ADL: Robocare, Mobiserv, Domeo, CompanionAble, QuoVadis, Robadom

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Multimodal perception interaction

Robot prototyp e

Needs and specifications, interaction and scenarii Robot assessment Methods

Questionnair es Focus groups

Procedures

Usability and acceptability Neuropsychological assessments Behavioral analysis Interactio n

Robadom: Objective

  • Develop an assistant and companion robot for older adults

with MCI

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Perceived enjoyment Perceived usefulness

Intention to use

Ease to use

First interaction Visceral reaction Usage Social signals Interaction Long term experience Social structures

Theorical model

  • Acceptance and use
  • Interactions with

robots

Use

Heerink & al 2010 Young & al 2010

slide-8
SLIDE 8

End-users needs

  • Difficulties: memory impairment, somatic diseases &

loneliness

  • Interest for services: cognitive stimulation,

assistance in finding small items, appointement reminder, visiocall

  • No expression of need for help in ADL
  • Fear of stigmatization and intrusion (Valkila et al 2009)
  • 22 older adults
  • MMSE = 19-30
  • Age = 66-88
  • Questionnaires
  • Focus groups
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Perceived enjoyment and usefulness Ease to use

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Usability of services

N MCI P (t- test) Total time 383,7 5 406,7 8 NS Errors in use 6,75 8,78 NS Aids 3,75 6,44 NS

17 MCI 15 NX 15 MCI

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Services

Interest + wish of other services linked to hobbies

  • Companion Interest + other modalities of expression, emotions
  • End-users

Useful for other people not for themselves

T V T V

WC Cuisine

Usability - Acceptance

Neven 2009

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Robot choice by end-users

slide-13
SLIDE 13

End-users robots choices

Animal 18% Humanoide 25% Machine 31% Furniture 26%

  • 15 older adults
  • MMSE = 22-30
  • Age = 65-85
  • Questionnaires
  • Focus groups
slide-14
SLIDE 14

h

1 2 4 3

  • Small, shiny, soft, plastic material, up-to-date design
  • Round shape, familiar item : teapot

Choices In Robots

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Designed robot

Movemen ts of wings camer a Expression

  • f emotions

Drawn by patients Robosoft

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Interaction Expressions, emotions

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Objective and method

  • How did 20 older and 23 young adults perceive

affects from expressions of the Nabaztag?

  • 27 expressions of Nabaztag
  • 3 colours: green, blue, and red
  • 3 ear positions: horizontal, vertical and asymmetric
  • 3 levels of speed of light blinking: rapid, slow and

continuous)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Procedure

  • Subjects categorized each of the 27 expressions of

Nabaztag into one of the 8 affects in term of adjective (surprised, enthusiastic, joyful, calm, inactive, bored, sad and frustrated).

  • These items were chosen

based on the circumplex model of affects

Russell, J.A.,1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: 39, 1161–1178

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Colours : perception of affects

10 20 30 40 50 surprised enthusiastic joyful calm * inactive bored sad frustrated * blue red green 10 20 30 40 50 surprised enthusiastic * joyful * calm * inactive bored * sad * frustrated * blue red green

Young adults Older adults

  • For the younger adults, colors were useful clues to

help interpret affects.

  • Blue mostly related to calmness & red to frustration
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Ear position: perception of affects

10 20 30 40 50 60 surprised * enthusiastic * joyful * calm * inactive bored * sad frustrated vertical asymetric horizontal 10 20 30 40 50 surprised enthusiastic * joyful * calm inactive bored sad * frustrated vertical asymetric horizontal

Young adults Older adults

  • The older adults used ear positions as clues to

interpret affects.

  • Vertical ear position mostly related to positive affects,

such as joy and enthusiasm.

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Older adult’s interaction with a robot, a virtual agent and a laptop

while playing a game of trivia?

  • 19 older adults’ preferences: Laptop>robot>avatar

Effect of physical embodiment on social interactions

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Perceived enjoyment Perceived usefulness

Appropriation?

Intention to use

Ease to use

First interaction Visceral reaction Usage Interactions Social signals Long term experience Social structures

Discussion

  • Acceptance and use
  • Interactions with robots

Use

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Tailor robots and services to end-users needs
  • Develop tools to test end-users’acceptance,

pleasure and engagement

  • Test at home and long term experience
  • Respect confidentiality and consent
  • Ensure liability and safety of use
  • Ensure ethical reflexion

– Safety in ADL versus intrusion – Companion versus loss of humanity – Innovation versus stigmatization

Main points: end-users and robots

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Thanks to

  • Dominique Duhaut, Brigitte Le Pevedic, Valoria,

Bretagne Sud University

  • Mohamed Chetouani, ISIR, Pierre et Marie Curie

University

  • Vincent Dupourque, Robosoft
  • ANR-TECSAN

LUSAGE LAB EA 4468