BURLINGTONS INTEGRATED WATER QUALITY PLAN Jenna Olson Water - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

burlington s
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

BURLINGTONS INTEGRATED WATER QUALITY PLAN Jenna Olson Water - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BURLINGTONS INTEGRATED WATER QUALITY PLAN Jenna Olson Water Policy & Programs Manager Burlington DPW Water Resources Division **Each area of responsibility involves its own set of regulatory requirements


slide-1
SLIDE 1

BURLINGTON’S INTEGRATED WATER QUALITY PLAN

Jenna Olson Water Policy & Programs Manager Burlington DPW – Water Resources Division

slide-2
SLIDE 2

**Each area of responsibility involves its own set of regulatory requirements

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 Current Annual Load Required Reduction

Required Phosphorous Reduction (pounds / year)

Current Annual Load = 20,523 pounds / year Required Reduction = 12,958 pounds / year

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • There are many different pathways

to compliance with the phosphorous reduction requirement

  • A combination of projects that will

meet the phosphorous reduction requirement – a “Project Portfolio” – must be chosen

  • Each ”Project Portfolio” has different

impacts, costs, and benefits

  • Many potential projects involve

neighborhood construction, impacts

  • n parking, or changes in how

leaves, lawns, or yards are managed

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

BUILDING A PROJECT PORTFOLIO

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Wastewater Treatment Plants

  • Further optimize P removal processes
  • Add tertiary or dual-use processes

Combined Sewer System Improvements

  • Sewer separation
  • Distributed storage

Stormwater Management

  • Install more distributed GSI systems

Non-Structural Programs

  • Expand street sweeping practices
  • Expand leaf management options

Private Property

  • Offer rebates / grants for GSI installations
  • Update / enhance ordinances
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Example:

  • Neighborhood green infrastructure vs.

combined sewer controls Example:

  • Resources needed for street sweeping
slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Wastewater & Combined Sewers – greater certainty, but more cost & no neighborhood

greening benefit

  • Green stormwater infrastructure – preferred in some neighborhoods, less regulatory certainty

& changes to streets

  • Operations - Street sweeping, catch basin cleaning, rebates, incentives – less certainty, involve

individual behavior changes, but other ancillary benefits

  • Grants/rebates: Provide more funds for property owners to take beneficial steps?
  • Regulations are more effective than incentives, but impose cost
  • Leaf control has big impacts on phosphorous loading – but may require different regulations and

actions

  • Street sweeping improves bikeability and protects the lake – but requires more intensive

parking management

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

NEXT STEPS

JULY

  • Public input summaries
  • Presentations to DPW Commission & TEUC
  • NPA Outreach

AUGUST

  • Public meetings to weigh in on specific portfolio options

SEPTEMBER

  • Presentations / hearings on preferred portfolio

OCTOBER – NOVEMBER

  • Finalizing Integrated Plan with regulators

DECEMBER

  • Complete Integrated Plan
slide-14
SLIDE 14

QUESTIONS?

14