BUILDING RESILIENCE IN THE ST. PETE CHHA ULI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

building resilience in the st pete chha
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

BUILDING RESILIENCE IN THE ST. PETE CHHA ULI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BUILDING RESILIENCE IN THE ST. PETE CHHA ULI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL (TAP) TUESDAY, JUNE 18 TH & WEDNESDAY, JUNE 19 TH , 2019 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE MISSION STATEMENT T O PROVIDE LEADERSHIP IN THE RESPONSIBLE USE OF LAND AND IN CREATING


slide-1
SLIDE 1

BUILDING RESILIENCE IN THE ST. PETE CHHA

ULI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL (TAP)

TUESDAY, JUNE 18TH & WEDNESDAY, JUNE 19TH , 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

URBAN LAND INSTITUTE MISSION STATEMENT

“TO PROVIDE LEADERSHIP IN THE RESPONSIBLE USE

OF LAND AND IN CREATING AND SUSTAINING THRIVING COMMUNITIES WORLDWIDE.”

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ULI ADVISORY SERVICES

  • DELIVER FRESH INSIGHTS AND DISCOVER INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS

TO REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT & LAND USE CHALLENGES.

  • PROVIDE CANDID AND UNBIASED INPUT FROM EXPERT LAND USE

PROFESSIONALS WHO VOLUNTEER THEIR TIME AND EXPERTISE.

  • KICK-START CRITICAL CONVERSATIONS AND DELIVER RESULTS.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

TAP PANELISTS

  • JIM CLOAR, DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES (TAP CHAIR)
  • CHRIS AHERN, APPLIED TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT
  • MICHAEL ANTINELLI, BRIZAGA, INC
  • LEIGH FLETCHER, FLETCHER & FISCHER
  • NICK HERRING, FRAMEWORK GROUP
  • MANUELA POWIDAYKO, CITY OF NEW YORK
  • KRISTINE RETETAGOS, KAST CONSTRUCTION
  • WHIT REMER, IBHS
  • TARYN SABIA, USF SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
  • JEREMY SHARP, CITY OF NORFOLK
  • SIOBHAN O’KANE, ULI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
  • JENNA WYLIE, ULI MANAGER
slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • TAP QUESTIONS
  • 1. EVALUATE THE DRAFT ZONING STANDARD AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT

AND:

  • A. IDENTIFY ADDITIONAL “REQUIREMENTS” THAT MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS MUST INCLUDE

WHEN CONSTRUCTING WITHIN THE CHHA, REGARDLESS OF AN INCREASE IN DENSITY.

i. (FOR EXAMPLE, THE CITY OF NORFOLK COMPONENTS/CATEGORIES ARE RISK REDUCTION, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, ENERGY RESILIENCE. CREATE SOME CATEGORIES THAT ARE MORE ST. PETERSBURG CENTRIC.)

B. ESTIMATE THE COSTS OF THE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.

  • C. ASSIGN A “WEIGHT” TO EACH REQUIREMENT AND DEVISE A “MINIMUM NUMBER OF POINTS

NEEDED” SCORECARD (FOR EACH COMPONENT/CATEGORY).

  • D. EXAMINE THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, INCLUDING INTRODUCING

BALANCING CRITERIA

  • 2. PROVIDE OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS PERTAINING TO THE DRAFT CHHA STANDARD

AND INTRODUCING INCREASED DENSITY IN THE CHHA.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

THE NORFOLK RESILIENCE QUOTIENT

  • CREATED THE NEW ORDINANCE IN 2018
  • GOAL OF BUILDING RESILIENCE TO ADDRESS FLOODING, ETC
  • RESILIENCE QUOTIENT IS APPLIED CITY-WIDE
  • RISK REDUCTION
  • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
  • ENERGY RESILIENCE
  • PURSUING THE POINT SYSTEM IS ONLY 1 OF 4 PATHWAYS FORWARD
  • OTHER PATHWAYS FORWARD:
  • ELEVATE 16” AND CAPTURE 1.25 INCHES OF STORMWATER
  • LEED GOLD OR EQUIVALENT EXEMPTION
  • HISTORIC REHAB EXEMPTION
  • EXTRA POINTS REQUIRED IN HIGH HAZARD AREA
slide-7
SLIDE 7

4 PATHWAYS TO MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT IN THE CHHA

Historic Structures:

+ Evacuation Plan + Points for “Recovery”

LEED Gold Certification:

+ Elevation Requirements + Points for “Recovery”

Workforce Housing:

+ Elevation Requirements + Points for “Recovery”

POINTS SYSTEM:

+ Elevation Requirements + Points in All 4 Components + Points threshold based on # of units

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CHHA MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMPONENTS OF IMPACT

Structural Mitigation Energy Nature-Based Mitigation Recovery

slide-9
SLIDE 9

lopment Act ivity Component 1: Structural Mitigation Requ ired + Add itional elevation above IFB Mach inery or equ ipment servicing (including eme rge ncy generato r) required + additional elevat ion of FB will generate additiona l points Construc t an impact-resistant and fully adhe red root Design building located in the Coasta l A Flood Zo ne to Flood Zone V standards Wi11 d des ign upgrade / App ly high velocity standa rds

  • a. 10-t MP H
  • B. 20+ MIPH

Innovat ion Value high high high high high Expected Cos t high low low high high

lilrili1

Urban Land

l!!!J

Institute

Tampa

Bay

STRUCTURAL MITIGATION

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Deve lopme nt Act ivity Component 2: Energy Efficiency On site renewab le energy sou rces

  • a. 5-10% reduct ion
  • b. 11-20% reduc tion
  • c. 21-30% reduct ion

75% resident ial and com mon areas cond itioned by geothe rmal (ex: The

Pea rl, Tampa ) On-s ite battery storage of solar gene rated powe r w ith X amo unt of capac ity Install cool roof to reduce heat absorpt ion Pre-w ire all units to accept powe r provided by on-s ite solar panels and/or wind turbines Install a 20+ SEER HVAC system in each dwe lling unit Install a 16-19 SEER HVAC system in each dwe lling unit Zone contro lled heating and cooling (effic iency) Install a solar or tank -less wate r heat ing system in , each un it Cross ventilation for each unit {no less than 2 open ings on different walls) Install high ly-reflective blinds/shades or w indow film/tint to reduce solar gain Value Expected Cost high high med high med high low low low low med med med med med med low low low low low low

ENERGY

slide-11
SLIDE 11

I

I

I

  • 1

Development Activity Value Component 3: Nature Based Solutions Protect coastal property w1 ith a living shoreline (LSL). Reference USAGE med Green Roof Natural Buffer: Setbacks are det 1ermined by zoning. Extra points for nature-based featu re in addition to setback . (ex: stormwater)

  • a. Stormwater Retentio n
  • b. Approp riate and beneficial plantings (native, droug ht tolerant , salt

adapted )

1; contribution to conservat ion fund in lieu of ability to achieve Comp. 3

Innovation med med high Expected Cost med med low med

I I

I

I

I

lilrili1

Urban Land

l!!!J

Institute

Tampa Bay

NATURE BASED

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • I
  • I

I I

  • I
  • I
  • Development Activity

______ Value Component 4: Recovery Illumination and natural daylighting high Install a generator for power generation to keep critical functions (refrigerator, freezer, basic lighting, healthcare appliances, etc.) working in the event of power failure high

  • a. life safetyl

I

  • b. refrigerator 1 point
  • c. HVAC common area 1 point

Resiliency hubs low Community room/shelter low Upr, grades to (m contribution to fund) and existing shelter high Innovation Points Expected Cost low high low low med

I

I

I I I I I

lilrili1

Urban Land

l!!!J

Institute

Tampa Bay

RECOVERY

slide-13
SLIDE 13

COST AND VALUE

slide-14
SLIDE 14

1r)

sze511,l~fJOI

  • ~-
, :,. ,:...

. ...... ... ...

:;.

D

Urban Land

Institute

Tampa Bay

COST AND VALUE

slide-15
SLIDE 15

NEXT STEPS

  • REFINE GOALS & VALUES FOR RESILIENT DEVELOPMENT
  • CONSIDER CONDUCTING VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CHHA
  • SOCIAL VULNERABILITIES, SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS (SES), TRANSPORTATION

DISADVANTAGED, HOUSING YEAR BUILT, ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS

  • IN ADDITION TO CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
  • ALIGN CITY’S GOALS & VALUES FOR RESILIENT DEVELOPMENT WITH ULI’S

VALUATION FOR POINT STRUCTURE

slide-16
SLIDE 16

, \illll

lilrili1

Urban Land

l!!!J

Institute

Tampa Bay

THANK YOU

TAMPABAY@ULI.ORG

slide-17
SLIDE 17

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 17.8 18 18.2 18.4 18.6 18.8 19 19.2

PRIORITY

[A] [1] [B] [4]