building resilience in the st pete chha
play

BUILDING RESILIENCE IN THE ST. PETE CHHA ULI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BUILDING RESILIENCE IN THE ST. PETE CHHA ULI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL (TAP) TUESDAY, JUNE 18 TH & WEDNESDAY, JUNE 19 TH , 2019 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE MISSION STATEMENT T O PROVIDE LEADERSHIP IN THE RESPONSIBLE USE OF LAND AND IN CREATING


  1. BUILDING RESILIENCE IN THE ST. PETE CHHA ULI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL (TAP) TUESDAY, JUNE 18 TH & WEDNESDAY, JUNE 19 TH , 2019

  2. URBAN LAND INSTITUTE MISSION STATEMENT “T O PROVIDE LEADERSHIP IN THE RESPONSIBLE USE OF LAND AND IN CREATING AND SUSTAINING THRIVING COMMUNITIES WORLDWIDE .”

  3. ULI ADVISORY SERVICES D ELIVER FRESH INSIGHTS AND DISCOVER INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS • TO REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT & LAND USE CHALLENGES . P ROVIDE CANDID AND UNBIASED INPUT FROM EXPERT LAND USE • PROFESSIONALS WHO VOLUNTEER THEIR TIME AND EXPERTISE . • K ICK - START CRITICAL CONVERSATIONS AND DELIVER RESULTS .

  4. TAP PANELISTS • J IM C LOAR , D OWNTOWN D EVELOPMENT S TRATEGIES (TAP C HAIR ) • C HRIS A HERN , A PPLIED T ECHNOLOGY & M ANAGEMENT • M ICHAEL A NTINELLI , B RIZAGA , I NC • L EIGH F LETCHER , F LETCHER & F ISCHER • N ICK H ERRING , F RAMEWORK G ROUP • M ANUELA P OWIDAYKO , C ITY OF N EW Y ORK • K RISTINE R ETETAGOS , KAST C ONSTRUCTION • W HIT R EMER , IBHS • T ARYN S ABIA , USF S CHOOL OF A RCHITECTURE & D ESIGN • J EREMY S HARP , C ITY OF N ORFOLK • S IOBHAN O’K ANE , ULI E XECUTIVE D IRECTOR • J ENNA W YLIE , ULI M ANAGER

  5. TAP QUESTIONS 1. E VALUATE THE DRAFT ZONING STANDARD AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND : A. I DENTIFY ADDITIONAL “ REQUIREMENTS ” THAT MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS MUST INCLUDE WHEN CONSTRUCTING WITHIN THE CHHA , REGARDLESS OF AN INCREASE IN DENSITY . i. (F OR EXAMPLE , THE C ITY OF N ORFOLK COMPONENTS / CATEGORIES ARE R ISK R EDUCTION , S TORMWATER M ANAGEMENT , E NERGY R ESILIENCE . C REATE SOME CATEGORIES THAT ARE MORE S T . P ETERSBURG CENTRIC .) - B. E STIMATE THE COSTS OF THE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS . C. A SSIGN A “ WEIGHT ” TO EACH REQUIREMENT AND DEVISE A “ MINIMUM NUMBER OF POINTS NEEDED ” SCORECARD ( FOR EACH COMPONENT / CATEGORY ). D. E XAMINE THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT , INCLUDING INTRODUCING BALANCING CRITERIA 2. P ROVIDE OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS PERTAINING TO THE DRAFT CHHA STANDARD AND INTRODUCING INCREASED DENSITY IN THE CHHA.

  6. THE NORFOLK RESILIENCE QUOTIENT C REATED THE NEW ORDINANCE IN 2018 • G OAL OF BUILDING RESILIENCE TO ADDRESS FLOODING , ETC • R ESILIENCE QUOTIENT IS APPLIED CITY - WIDE • • R ISK R EDUCTION • S TORMWATER MANAGEMENT E NERGY R ESILIENCE • P URSUING THE POINT SYSTEM IS ONLY 1 OF 4 PATHWAYS FORWARD • • O THER P ATHWAYS F ORWARD : • E LEVATE 16” AND C APTURE 1.25 INCHES OF STORMWATER • LEED GOLD OR EQUIVALENT EXEMPTION • HISTORIC REHAB EXEMPTION E XTRA POINTS REQUIRED IN HIGH HAZARD AREA •

  7. 4 PATHWAYS TO MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT IN THE CHHA POINTS SYSTEM: LEED Gold Certification: + Elevation Requirements + Elevation Requirements + Points in All 4 Components + Points for “Recovery” + Points threshold based on # of units Workforce Housing: Historic Structures: + Evacuation Plan + Elevation Requirements + Points for “Recovery” + Points for “Recovery”

  8. CHHA MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMPONENTS OF IMPACT Structural Mitigation Energy Nature-Based Mitigation Recovery

  9. STRUCTURAL MITIGATION lopment Act ivity Value Expected Cos t Component 1: Structural Mitigation Requ ired + Add itional elevation above IFB high high Mach inery or equ ipment servicing (including eme rge ncy generato r) required + additional elevat ion of FB will generate additiona l points high low Construc t an impact-resistant and fully adhe red root high low Design building located in the Coasta l A Flood Zo ne to Flood Zone V standards high high Wi11 d des ign upgrade / App ly high velocity standa rds high high a. 10-t MP H B. 20+ MIPH Innovat ion lilrili1 Urban Land l!!!J Institute Tampa Bay

  10. ENERGY Deve lopme nt Act ivity Value Expected Cost Component 2: Energy Efficiency On site renewab le energy sou rces high high a. 5-10% reduct ion b. 11-20% reduc tion c. 21-30% reduct ion 75% resident ial and com mon areas cond itioned by geothe rmal (ex: The Pea rl, Tampa ) med high On-s ite battery storage of solar gene rated powe r w ith X amo unt of capac ity med high Install cool roof to reduce heat absorpt ion low low Pre-w ire all units to accept powe r provided by on-s ite solar panels and/or wind turbines low low Install a 20+ SEER HVAC system in each dwe lling unit med med Install a 16-19 SEER HVAC system in each dwe lling unit med med Zone contro lled heating and cooling (effic iency) med med Install a solar or tank -less wate r heat ing system in , each un it low low Cross ventilation for each unit {no less than 2 open ings on different walls) low low Install high ly-reflective blinds/shades or w indow film/tint to reduce solar gain low low

  11. NATURE BASED Development Activity Value Expected Cost Component 3: Nature Based Solutions I I Protect coastal property w1 ith a living shoreline (LSL). Reference USAGE med med I I Green Roof med med I Natural Buffer: Setbacks are det 1 ermined by zoning. Extra points for nature-based featu re in addition to setback . (ex: stormwater) med low I I a. Stormwater Retentio n I •1 b. Approp riate and beneficial plantings (native, droug ht tolerant , salt adapted ) 1; contribution to conservat ion fund in lieu of ability to achieve Comp. 3 high med Innovation lilrili1 Urban Land l!!!J Institute Tampa Bay

  12. RECOVERY Development Activity ______ Value Expected Cost Component 4: Recovery I -I Illumination and natural daylighting high low I Install a generator for power generation to keep critical functions • I (refrigerator, freezer, basic lighting, healthcare appliances, etc.) working in the event of power failure high high I I a. life safetyl I I b. refrigerator 1 point I I c. HVAC common area 1 point -I • I I Resiliency hubs low low I Community room/shelter low low • Upr, grades to (m contribution to fund) and existing shelter high med Innovation Points lilrili1 Urban Land l!!!J Institute Tampa Bay

  13. COST AND VALUE

  14. COST AND VALUE 1r) sze511,l~fJOI - . ...... ... ... ,:... ~- :;. , :,. D Urban Land Institute Tampa Bay

  15. NEXT STEPS R EFINE G OALS & VALUES FOR R ESILIENT D EVELOPMENT • C ONSIDER C ONDUCTING V ULNERABILITY A SSESSMENTS FOR THE CHHA • S OCIAL VULNERABILITIES , SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS ( SES ), TRANSPORTATION • DISADVANTAGED , HOUSING YEAR BUILT , ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS • I N ADDITION TO CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE • ALIGN CITY ’ S GOALS & VALUES FOR RESILIENT DEVELOPMENT WITH ULI’ S VALUATION FOR POINT STRUCTURE

  16. THANK YOU , \illll lilrili1 Urban Land TAMPABAY@ULI.ORG l!!!J Institute Tampa Bay

  17. [A] [1] PRIORITY 1.2 [B] 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 [4] 0.2 0 17.8 18 18.2 18.4 18.6 18.8 19 19.2

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend