BUILDING QUBECS FIRST DIAMOND MINE Annual General Meeting, October 19 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

building qu bec s first diamond mine
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

BUILDING QUBECS FIRST DIAMOND MINE Annual General Meeting, October 19 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BUILDING QUBECS FIRST DIAMOND MINE Annual General Meeting, October 19 th 2015, Montreal Matt Manson Patrick Godin President, CEO & Director COO & Director 2 Forward-Looking Information This presentation contains


slide-1
SLIDE 1

BUILDING QUÉBEC’S FIRST DIAMOND MINE

Annual General Meeting, October 19th 2015, Montreal

Matt Manson Patrick Godin

President, CEO & Director COO & Director

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Forward-Looking Information

This presentation contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation. This information and these statements, referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”, are made as of the date of this presentation and the Corporation does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward- looking statements, except as required by law. These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions. Although management considers these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may prove to be incorrect. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance and reflect current expectations or beliefs regarding future events and include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to: (i) the amount of Mineral Resources and exploration targets; (ii) the amount of future production over any period; (iii) net present value and internal rates of return of the mining operation; (iv) assumptions relating to recovered grade, average ore recovery, internal dilution, mining dilution and other mining parameters set out in the 2011 Feasibility Study or the Optimization Study; (v) assumptions relating to gross revenues, operating cash flow and other revenue metrics set out in the 2011 Feasibility Study or the Optimization Study; (vi) mine expansion potential and expected mine life; (vii) expected time frames for completion of permitting and regulatory approvals related to construction activities at the Renard Diamond Project; (viii) the expected time frames for the completion of the open pit and underground mine at the Renard Diamond Project; (ix) the expected time frames for the completion of construction, start of mining and commercial production at the Renard Diamond Project and the financial obligations or costs incurred by Stornoway in connection with such mine development; (x) future exploration plans; (xi) future market prices for rough diamonds; (xii) the economic benefits of using liquefied natural gas rather than diesel for power generation; (xiii) sources of and anticipated financing requirements; (xiv) the effectiveness, funding or availability, as the case may require, of the Stream, the Senior Secured Loan, the COF and the Equipment Facility and the use of proceeds therefrom; (xv) the Corporation’s expectations regarding receipt of the remaining deposits under the Stream and its ability to meet its delivery obligations thereunder; (xvi) the impact of the Financing Transactions on the Corporation’s operations, infrastructure, opportunities, financial condition, access to capital and overall strategy; (xvii) the foreign exchange rate between the US dollar and the Canadian dollar; and (xviii) the availability of excess funding for the construction and operation of the Renard Diamond Project. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “schedule” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made based upon certain assumptions by Stornoway or its consultants and other important factors that, if untrue, could cause the actual results, performances or achievements of Stornoway to be materially different from future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Such statements and information are based on numerous assumptions regarding present and future business prospects and strategies and the environment in which Stornoway will operate in the future, including the price of diamonds, anticipated costs and Stornoway’s ability to achieve its goals, anticipated financial performance, regulatory developments, development plans, exploration, development and mining activities and commitments, and the foreign exchange rate between the US and Canadian dollars. Although management considers its assumptions on such matters to be reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may prove to be incorrect. Certain important assumptions by Stornoway or its consultants in making forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) required capital investment and estimated workforce requirements; (ii) estimates of net present value and internal rates of return; (iii) anticipated timelines for completion of construction, commencement of mine production and development of an open pit and underground mine at the Renard Diamond Project, which heavily depend, among other things, on adequate availability and performance of skilled labour, engineering and construction personnel, performance of mining and construction equipment and timely delivery of components; (iv) anticipated geological formations; (v) market prices for rough diamonds and the potential impact on the Renard Diamond Project; (vi) the satisfaction or waiver of all conditions under each

  • f the Stream, the Senior Secured Loan, the COF and the Equipment Facility to allow the Corporation to draw on the funding available under those financing elements for the

completion of the development and construction of the Renard Diamond Project; (vii) Stornoway’s interpretation of the geological drill data collected and its potential impact on stated Mineral Resources and mine life; (viii) future exploration plans and objectives; (ix) the receipt of the remaining deposits under the Stream and the Corporation’s ability to meet its delivery obligations thereunder; and (x) the continued strength of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar. Additional risks are described in Stornoway's most recently filed Annual Information Form, annual and interim MD&A, and other disclosure documents available under the Corporation’s profile at: www.sedar.com.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Forward-Looking Information (contd)

The Renard Diamond Project, September 16, 2015 By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, and risks exist that estimates, forecasts, projections and

  • ther forward-looking statements will not be achieved or that assumptions do not reflect future experience. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on these forward-

looking statements as a number of important risk factors could cause the actual outcomes to differ materially from the beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations, anticipations, estimates, assumptions and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements. These risk factors may be generally stated as the risk that the assumptions and estimates expressed above do not occur, including the assumption in many forward-looking statements that other forward-looking statements will be correct. Stornoway invites the reader to take note of the risk and uncertainties set out in the most recently filed Annual Information Form, annual and interim MD&A and other disclosure documents available under the Corporation’s profile at: www.sedar.com and cautions the reader that the list of risk and uncertainties set out in these disclosure documents of the Corporation and that may affect future results is not exhaustive, and new, unforeseeable risks may arise from time to time. Readers are also referred to the technical reports dated as of February 28th, 2013 entitled “The Renard Diamond Project, Québec, Canada, Feasibility Study Update, NI 43- 101 Technical Report, February 28, 2013” in respect of the January 2013 Optimization Study, and dated October 14, 2015 entitled “2015 Mineral Resource Update, for the Renard Diamond Project, Québec, Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report”. Disclosure of a scientific or technical nature in this presentation was prepared under the supervision

  • f Patrick Godin, P. Eng (Québec), Chief Operating Officer and Robin Hopkins, P. Geol. (NT/NU), Vice President, Exploration, both “qualified persons” under National

Instrument (NI) 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Ms. Darrell Farrow, PrSciNat, P. Geo. (BC), Ordre des géologue du Québec (Special Authorization # 332) of Geostrat Consulting Services Inc. is the independent qualified person responsible for preparation of the mineral resource estimate for the Renard Diamond Project.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Stornoway Diamond Corporation TSX:SWY

On Budget, On Schedule Construction 47.4% complete compared to 42.9% planned by end September 2015. Forecast cost to complete within C$811m budget. Plant Commissioning 2H 2016. Commercial Production 2Q 2017. Building the Renard Diamond Project, Québec’s First Diamond Mine

Site Overview Sep 16, 2015 The Renard Diamond Project, September 16, 2015

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

From the 2014 AGM…

43

Québec’s First Diamond Mine is Ready to Build

Project Green-lighted: Authorizations Issued Community Agreements in Place Stornoway Operating Team in Place Access Road Opened Resource Growing Project Design Fully Optimized Favourable Cost Environment

Stornoway is Fully Focused on the Timely Completion of Final Project Financing

50

Stornoway Diamond Corporation TSX:SWY

Our Priorities

www.stornowaydiamonds.com

Solid project execution Budget, schedule and operating excellence Disciplined management of cash and expenditures Strong balance sheet Delivering on project’s strong margin and cash flow potential Then… Retain exposure to pipeline exploration assets through JVs With successful construction and commissioning behind us, look to the future

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Good Timing

The Renard Project Financing, Closed July 8th, 2014

Type Amount (% of Total) Description

Common Equity

C$374M (40%)

  • C$132M marketed public equity offering of subscription receipts
  • C$242M private placement to Orion (US$110M), RQ (C$100M) and Caisse (C$22M)

Diamond Stream

US$250M (29%)

  • 20% diamond stream (Orion 16%, Caisse 4%) with ~US$56/ct(1) ongoing payment

Convertible Debentures

US$81M (9%)

  • Provided by Orion; 7 year, 6.25% coupon, 35% conversion premium to equity issue

price Senior Debt

C$120M (11%)

  • Provided by IQ; 7 year amortizing payment, Fixed (QC Bond)+5.75% or Prime +4.75%

Equipment Financing

US$35M (4%)

  • Provided by Caterpillar

Cost Overrun Facility

C$48M (5%)

  • C$20M provided by IQ (same terms as senior debt)
  • C$28M provided by Caisse (unsecured, 7 year term, 10% coupon)

Total

C$946M (100%)

Assumes US$1.00 = C$1.10 1. Includes reimbursement of marketing expenses

Counter-Party Amount (% of Total)

Orion Mine Finance

C$367M (39%)

Investissement Québec/ Ressources Québec

C$240M (25%)

Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec

C$105M (11%)

Caterpillar Financial

C$39M (4%)

Public

C$195M (21%)

Total

C$946M (100%)

In April 2015 Blackstone Tactical Opportunities, an affiliate of Blackstone (NYSE-BX), acquired a c.5% equity position in Stornoway and a minority 4% ownership interest in the Renard diamond stream by way of a secondary market transaction with Orion Mine Finance (“Orion”). The first two of three tranches of the Renard Diamond stream funded in March and September 2015, on schedule. The third and final tranche is scheduled for March 2016. Subsequent to Transaction Closing

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Good Timing: Sources and Uses of Funds to July 31, 2015

On Current C$:US$ Exchange Rates, Unaudited unless noted

(all amounts in millions of C$) Assumed Actual use

  • f Proceeds

to July 31, 2015 Renard Diamond Project Capital Expenditures 811 311 Route 167 Extension (1) 70 70 Financing Costs, Interest during Construction 58 24 Mine Closure Guarantee 16 2 Pre-production Net Revenue (26)

  • Total Project Costs

929 407 General Corporate Purposes Equity fees and transaction costs 18 29 General working capital, administrative and salary expenses 14 6 Total Uses 961 442

Costs

Notes

1. The total amount borrowed pursuant to the Renard Mine Road loan was $77 million, of which $70 million was used for construction of the Renard Mine Road and $7 million was used for civil works related to the airstrip. Costs related to the airstrip were included in the $811 million capital expenditures line in the table above. 2. On September 30, 2015, Stornoway received the second tranche of US$80m of stream funding, which was subsequently converted to C$ at an exchange rate of $1.336, representing a cash gain of C$18.9 million compared to the July 2014 funding plan, which assumed a C$:US$ exchange rate of $1.10. 3. Cost Overrun Facility includes the $20 million Senior Loan Facility, Tranche B and the $28 million Cost Overrun Facility with the CDPQ 4. Assuming a C$:US$ conversion rate of C$1.25 5. This forecast assumes a project cost of $811 million (which includes assumed levels of escalation and contingencies), the satisfaction of all covenants and conditions precedent for future funding, and a CAD$:US$ exchange rate of $1.25 for unfunded US dollar denominated financing commitments.

(all amounts in millions of C$) Sources of Funds Stream Deposits not yet received(2) 213 Senior Loan Facility, Tranche A 100 Cost Overrun Facility(3) 48 Equipment Financing Facility(4) 17

Undrawn Sources of Funds As of July 31, 2015, Stornoway forecasts excess financing capacity available to complete the project

  • f approximately $101 million comprised of $53

million of cash, receivables and expected mine

tax credits and $48 million of undrawn cost

  • verrun facilities(5).
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Good Timing: Capital Markets

Recent Equity Issue Activity in the Mining Sector

Total Mining Issuance Mining Issuance: 2014 and 2015 YTD

Sub-Sector # Deals C$MM Gold 35 $1,687.2 Uranium 6 $78.3 Silver 3 $1,828.5 Rare Earth 2 $79.0 Zinc $0.0 Coal $0.0 Molybdenum $0.0 Nickel 2 $10.0 Total 63 $5,346 2015 YTD Mining Sector Breakdown Diamonds 6 $169.8 Diversified 7 $1,480.8 Lithium 1 $8.0 Iron Ore $0.0 Sub-Sector # Deals C$MM Gold 64 $2,396.4 Diversified 23 $1,407.0 Uranium 12 $166.2 Copper 4 $188.5 Lithium 1 $15.8 Silver 5 $127.3 Rare Earth 4 $37.8 Coal 1 $0.0 Molybdenum $0.0 Nickel $10.2 Total 129 $4,789 2014 Mining Sector Breakdown Zinc 4 $36.2 Iron Ore 2 $3.0 Diamonds 9 $400.6

In 2014, C$4.8 billion was raised in the mining sector through new public equity offerings, including Stornoway’s July 2014 transaction. The vast majority was within the gold sector, followed by the diversified and diamond sectors (including Stornoway’s July 2014 transaction). Excluding 2 large transactions in 2015 (Silver Wheaton; $1.0 billion, First Quantum; $1.4 billion), financings in 2015 are tracking lower than 2014. The focus of 2015-YTD has been silver, representing 35.0% of mining dollars raised. Diamond financings in 2015-YTD have been a much smaller proportion of new equity issuances

  • ver 2014.

No improvement in the equity capital markets for public resource issuers is expected in 2015. Commentary

$12.9 $7.9 $19.9 $12.1 $8.2 $6.9 $5.5 $4.8 $5.3 255 110 188 303 261 148 129 129 63 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD C$Bn # Copper 1 $4.0 Source: Dundee Equity Capital Markets and FP Infomart.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Good Timing: Construction Market

First Call on Best People, Contractors and Equipment

CWX X-Ray Machines, In Fabrication LNG Vaporizer Vessels, in Fabrication PROMEC Mobilization for Power Plant Vibrating Screens, Delivered Caterpillar 60t UG Truck, Delivered Plant centrifuges, in Fabrication

Renard is currently the only major mine in construction in Eastern Canada. Benefits to Stornoway:

  • First call on the best people, contractors,

and equipment

  • Shortened contract tendering process
  • Reduced lead times on key equipment
  • Cost control
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Good Timing: Diamond Market and Canadian Dollar

Rough Diamond Pricing 2009-2015

May 2011 FS Diamond Valuation

50 100 150 200 250 300 350

1-Jan-09 1-Jan-10 1-Jan-11 1-Jan-12 1-Jan-13 1-Jan-14 1-Jan-15

Index to 2009=100

WWW Rough Index, Renard Model Price Growth, Real Terms

CAD USD

FS 2.5% Price Model (Nominal, adjusted for CPI) with +/- 10% Sensitivity

WWW Rough Diamond Price Index

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Publicly Listed Diamond Producers, Developers and Explorers

Consensus Analyst Views on Value

Ticker Price (16/10/15) Shares O/S (mm) Market Cap ($mm) NAV/sh(1) Current P/NAV(1) Target (1) % Return to Target Annual Dividend

Diamond Producers

ALROSA ALRS:M ₽56.06 7,365.0 ₽412,880 (n/a) (n/a) ₽77.17

40%

₽1.47/sh Dominion Diamonds DDC:T $13.95 85.1 $1,187.6 $29.88 0.5x $24.80

81%

US$0.40/sh Gem GEMD:LN £1.08 138.3 £149.7 £2.16 0.5x £1.84

73%

US$0.05/sh Lucara LUC:T $1.73 379.6 $656.6 $2.48 0.7x $2.50

47%

$0.04/sh Petra PDL:LN £0.94 512.1 £478.8 £1.85 0.5x £1.78

93%

£0.02/sh

Diamond Developers

Firestone FDI:LN £0.22 309.0 £67.6 £0.51 0.4x £0.45

104%

(n/a) Mountain Province MPV:T $4.16 159.7 $664.2 $7.15 0.6x $6.69

61%

(n/a)

Stornoway SWY:T $0.74 732.3 $541.9 $1.47 0.5x $1.21 64% (n/a)

Diamond Explorers

Kennady Diamonds KDI:LN $2.95 46.3 $136.4 (n/a) (n/a) (n/a) (n/a) (n/a) North Arrow Minerals NAR:V $0.25 54.0 $13.5 (n/a) (n/a) (n/a) (n/a) (n/a) Peregrine Diamonds PGD:T $0.175 282.7 $49.5 (n/a) (n/a) (n/a) (n/a) (n/a) Shore Gold SGF:T $0.17 248.7 $42.3 (n/a) (n/a) (n/a) (n/a) (n/a)

Notes: 1. Bloomberg and Thomson One Analyst Consensus All Currencies in C$ unless specified

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Shareholding

Share Price (TSX-SWY):

Oct 16, 2015

C$ $0.74 52 week High-Low C$ $0.46–$0.85 Average Daily Volume:

Last 12 Months

374,593 Market Capitalization: C$ 542 million Total Shares Outstanding: 732 million Total Options & Warrants Outstanding:

(28.2m Options $0.59-$5.36; 123.8m warrants $0.90-$1.21)

152 million Consolidated Cash1,2:

(as of July 31, 2015)

C$ 270 million Consolidated Debt1: (as of July 31, 2015) C$ 220 million Undrawn Financing Commitments2,3:

(Subject to Financing Agreement CPs)

C$ 352 million

Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet and Capital Structure

Notes 1. Unaudited 2. Does not include funds received from second tranche of the Stream on September 30th 3. Assuming a C$:US$ conversion rate of C$1.10

Investissement Québec 28.6% 22.7% Orion Mine Finance 19.5% 17.5% CDPQ 6.1% 6.2% Float 45.8% 53.6%

Diluted Basic

  • 100.0%
  • 50.0%

0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 150.0%

One Year Equity Performance of Selected Diamond Companies

SWY DDC GEMD LUC PDL FDI MPV KDI NAR PGD SGF

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13 13

Renard Mineral Resources and Exploration Upside

slide-14
SLIDE 14

800m 900m 1100m 1200m 1000m

Renard Mine Plan and Key Operating Assumptions

A Combined Open Pit and Underground Operation

Notes 1. Key Assumptions:C$1=US$1, Oil US$95/barrel, 2.5% real terms diamond price growth, 82.9% ore recovery, 23.8% mining and internal dilution, 0cpht dilution grade. 2. Expressed in May 2011 terms. Average price US$190/carat in March 2014 terms. 3. Expressed in October 2012 terms, as adjusted in October 2013 LNG FS. Includes C$754m of costs and contingencies and C$57m of escalation allowance. 4. Expressed in October 2012 terms. Operating costs C$54/tonne in October 2013 LNG FS terms. Excludes capitalized preproduction costs. 5. Before stream Reserve and Resource categories are compliant with the "CIM Definition Standards

  • n Mineral Resources and Reserves". Mineral resources that are not mineral

reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The potential quantity and grade of any Exploration Target is conceptual in nature, and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.

Reserve Based Mine Plan1

(Jan 2013 FS Optimization and October 2013 LNG Option FS)

Mine Life 11 years Mineral Reserve 17.9 mcarats

  • Ave. Diamond Price2

$180/carat Production Rate 2.2 mtonnes/yr

  • Ave. Diamond Production

1.6 mcarats/yr Gross Revenue (C$M)2 $4,268 Initial Capital Costs3 $811m Operating Cost4 $58/t ($76/carat) Operating Margin5 67% Payback 4.8 years

0m 100m 200m 400m 600m 700m 500m 300m

Renard 4 Renard 9 Renard 65 Renard 2 Renard 3

Mineral Resource Estimate Effective September 24, 2015 (NI 43-101) 13 mcarats Inferred Mineral Resources 33 to 71 mcarats TFFE 30 mcarats Indicated Mineral Resources

An Updated Renard Mine Plan, scheduled for Q2 2016, is expected to include additional mine production from new Indicated Mineral Resources in Renard 2 and Renard 65, deepening of the Renard 2-3 open pit, extension of the underground mine infrastructure to 700m, and an optimized schedule for plant commissioning and ramp-up.

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Renard 2 Mineral Resource Classification

Effective September 24, 2015. Changes to Previous Estimate Shown in Italics

Pipe shape at surface (1.89ha) High TFFE at 1,250m (1.38ha)

Notes

1 Reserve and Resource categories were completed in accordance with the "CIM Definition Standards

  • n Mineral Resources and Reserves". Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have

demonstrated economic viability.

2 Totals may not add due to rounding. 3 Carats per hundred tonnes. Estimated at a +1 DTC sieve size cut-off. 4 Diamond valuation data utilized for the test of prospects of reasonable economic extraction are

derived from a diamond valuation exercise undertaken in March 2014 (see Stornoway Annual Information Form dated July 2015).

0m 700m 850m 1250m

INDICATED INFERRED TFFE

600m: Base of Previous Indicated Mineral Resources

Depth Below Surface

Kimberlite

  • utline

at surface (0.75ha) Low TFFE at 1,250m (0.62ha) Base of New Indicated Resources (1.55ha)

Indicated Mineral Resources(1,2,4)

Contained Carats (millions) Tonnes (millions) Grade (cpht)(3) Renard 2, All Units 21.58 +15.6% 25.70 +38.3% 84

  • 16.4%

Renard 2, w/o CRB- 2A, CRB 20.39 +11.0% 20.52 +15.9% 99

  • 4.3%

CRB-2A 0.29 +2.6% 0.90 +2.6% 32

  • CRB

0.90 n/a 4.28 n/a 21 n/a

Inferred Mineral Resources(1,2)

Contained Carats (millions) Tonnes (millions) Grade (cpht)(3) Renard 2, All Units 3.88

  • 48.0%

6.59

  • 44.0%

59

  • 7.2%

Renard 2, w/o CRB 3.36

  • 46.1%

4.08

  • 22.0%

82

  • 30.9%

CRB 0.53

  • 57.6%

2.51

  • 61.6%

21 +10.5%

Target for Further Exploration(1)

Contained Carats (millions) Tonnes (millions) Grade (cpht)(2) Renard 2, All Units 3.7 to 15.5 6.1 to 15.5 60 to 100

North View

Renard 2 NI 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate Renard 2 Targets for Further Exploration

Notes

1 Represents potential upside that can be reasonably assumed given the nature and grade of material

within the current 2015 Mineral Resource. The potential quantity and grade of any Exploration Target is conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient information to define a mineral resource, and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.

2 Carats per hundred tonnes. Potential at a +1 DTC sieve size cut-off.

Pinch in model in area lacking drill coverage

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Renard 2 Geological Model and Unit Grades

Effective September 24, 2015. Changes to Previous Estimate Shown in Italics

Within the Indicated Mineral Resources

Average Grade (cpht)(1) Average Dilution (%)(2) Kimb 2a (“Blue”) 76 +3.0% 52

  • 0.9%

Kimb 2b (“Brown”) 145 +1.0% 30

  • 0.9%

Kimb 2c (HK)3 229 +0.5% 12

  • 3.1%

CRB-2a 32

  • 93
  • CRB

21 n/a 96 n/a

Within the Inferred Mineral Resources

Average Grade (cpht)(1) Average Dilution (%)(2) Kimb 2a (“Blue”) 67

  • 2.4%

65 +9.2% Kimb 2b (“Brown”) 145 +0.3% 30 +1.5% Kimb 2c (HK)3 229 +0.5% 12

  • 3.1%

CRB 21 +10.5% 96

  • Notes

1 Carats per hundred tonnes. Estimated at a +1 DTC sieve size cut-off. 2 Represents the average amount of non-diamond bearing country rock

estimated within each geological unit.

3 The Kimb 2c (Hypabyssal Kimberlite, or “HK”) unit is a constituent component

  • f each of the Kimb2a, Kimb2b, CRB and CRB-2a units.

Renard 2 Average Mineral Resource Grades, by Geological Unit

Kimb2b (“Brown”) Kimb2a (“Blue”) CRB CRB-2a Kimb2c (HK)

West View

Contact Pinch in model in area lacking drill coverage

0m 700m 850m 1250m

INDICATED INFERRED TFFE

600m: Base of Previous Indicated Mineral Resources

Depth Below Surface

North View

Photographs of geological units from the 2007 Renard underground bulk sample program

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Renard 2 Geological Model and Renard 2-Renard 3 Convergence

Effective September 24, 2015

Pipe shape at surface (1.89ha) Kimberlite outline at surface (0.75ha) Kimb2b (“Brown”) Kimb2a (“Blue”) CRB CRB-2a

Surface View, Looking Down Surface View, Looking Down 0m 700m 850m 1250m

R2 INDICATED R2 INFERRED R2 TFFE

Depth Below Surface

R3 INDICATED R3 INFERRED R3 TFFE

North East View

Resource categories were completed in accordance with the "CIM Definition Standards

  • n Mineral Resources and Reserves". Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do

not have demonstrated economic viability. The potential quantity and grade of any Exploration Target is conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient information to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.

Renard 2 Renard 3 Renard 2 Renard 3

126.6m R3 intersection in DDH R2- 81J (in red) starting 942.2m downhole: 47m true width. R3 TFFE: >500m potential between drill intersections

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Renard Diamond Project NI 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate

Effective September 24, 2015. Changes to Previous Estimate Shown in Italics

Notes

1 Resource categories were completed in accordance with the "CIM Definition

Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves". Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

2 Totals may not add due to rounding. 3 Carats per hundred tonnes. Estimated at a +1 DTC sieve size cut-off. 4 Diamond valuation data utilized for the test of prospects of reasonable economic

extraction are derived from a diamond valuation exercise undertaken in March 2014 (see Stornoway Annual Information Form dated July 2015).

Indicated Mineral Resources(1,2,4)

Contained Carats (millions) Tonnes (millions) Grade (cpht)(3) Renard 2, All Units 21.58 +15.6% 25.70 +38.3% 84

  • 16.4%

Renard 2, w/o CRB-2A, CRB 20.39 +11.0% 20.52 +15.9% 99

  • 4.3%

CRB-2A 0.29 +2.6% 0.90 +2.6% 32

  • CRB

0.90 n/a 4.28 n/a 21 n/a Renard 3 1.86 +2.3% 1.82 +3.4% 102

  • 1.0%

Renard 4 4.44 +3.0% 7.25

  • 61

+3.0% Renard 65 2.30

  • 7.87
  • 29
  • Total Indicated

Mineral Resources 30.17 +11.4% 42.63 +20.2% 71

  • 7.4%

Inferred Mineral Resources(1,2)

Contained Carats (millions) Tonnes (millions) Grade (cpht)(3) Renard 2, All Units 3.88

  • 48.0%

6.59

  • 44.0%

59

  • 7.2%

Renard 2, w/o CRB 3.36

  • 46.1%

4.08

  • 22.0%

82

  • 30.9%

CRB 0.53

  • 57.6%

2.51

  • 61.6%

21 +10.5% Renard 3 0.61

  • 0.54
  • 112
  • Renard 4

2.46 +3.5% 4.75

  • 52

+3.5% Renard 65 1.18

  • 4.93
  • 24
  • Renard 9

3.04

  • 5.70
  • 53
  • Lynx

1.92

  • 1.80
  • 107
  • Hibou

0.26

  • 0.18
  • 144
  • Total Inferred

Mineral Resources 13.35

  • 20.8%

24.49

  • 17.5%

54

  • 4.0%

Inferred Mineral Resources Indicated Mineral Resources High Range TFFE Renard 65 775m depth Renard 4 775m depth Renard 9 775m depth Renard 2 1,250m depth Renard 3 1,250m depth

North East View

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Renard Diamond Project Exploration Potential

Effective September 24, 2015. Changes to Previous Potential Shown in Italics

Notes

1 Target for Further Exploration: represents

potential upside that can be reasonably assumed given the nature and grade of material within the current 2015 Mineral Resource. The Renard 2 shape has been projected 250m below the deepest kimberlite intersection at 1,000m depth. Tonnage and grade ranges are not directly applicable to potential total carats.The potential quantity and grade of any Exploration Target is conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient information to define a mineral resource, and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.

2 Carats per hundred tonnes. Potential at a +1

DTC sieve size cut-off. Notes Resource categories were completed in accordance with the "CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves". Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Area indicated in yellow represents a gap in drill coverage that may represent additional exploration potential outside of the current Mineral Resource Estimate and not included in the current Targets for Further Exploration.

Renard 65 775m depth Renard 4 775m depth Renard 9 775m depth Renard 2 1,250m depth Renard 3 1,250m depth Inferred Mineral Resources Indicated Mineral Resources High Range TFFE

North East View

R10 R7 R1 R65 R4 R9 R2 R3

Targets for Further Exploration(1)

Contained Carats (millions) Tonnes (millions) Grade (cpht)(2) Renard 1 1.7 to 3.9 8.6 to 13.0 20 to 30 Renard 2, All Units 3.7 to 15.5 6.1 to 15.5 60 to 100 Renard 3 3.6 to 6.3 3.4 to 3.8 105 to 168 Renard 4 5.6 to 11.8 11.1 to 15.4 50 to 77 Renard 65 7.3 to 13.5 29.0 to 40.9 25 to 33 Renard 7 1.9 to 3.8 6.3 to 9.4 30 to 40 Renard 9 2.0 to 4.3 3.9 to 6.3 52 to 68 Renard 10 0.7 to 2.1 1.2 to 1.7 60 to 120 Lynx 3.0 to 3.8 3.1 to 3.2 96 to 120 Hibou 3.6 to 6.1 3.5 to 4.0 104 to 151

Total TFFE 33.0 +28% to 71.1 +40% 76.2 +49% to 113.2 +51%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20 20

Construction Report (Patrick Godin)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Environment, Health, Safety, and Stornoway’sTeam

“Courage to Care”

On Personal Safety On the Safety of our Colleagues On the Environment With our Inter-cultural workforce

Lost Time Injury Rate

SWY employees: 0.0 (43,453 hours worked to end of Sept.) Contractors: 0.7 (79,149 hours worked to end of Sept.) Renard Total: 0.44 Québec Construction Industry: 2.2 Québec Mining Industry: 0.8

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Approach to Mine Construction

Chevrolet/Cadillac Access Road Airport Terminal Accommodation Complex Mine Dry and Office Process Plant Power Plant Airport Landing Strip Water Management and Treatment Facility Maintenance Facility Mining Equipment

“Chevrolet” “Cadillac”

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Construction Sequence

2H 2H 2H 2H 1H 1H 1H 1H

2013 2014 2015 2016

All in parallel with open pit and underground mining activities

R2-R3 R65 Camp Process Plant Portal

  • 1. Construct Access:

Road and Airport

  • 3. Close Buildings of Major

Facilities (“Outside-In”)

  • 2. Build Camp and

Mine Office/Dry

  • 4. Equip Major Facilities
  • 5. Commence Operations
slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Renard Mining Road and Airport

The 240km long Route 167 Extension and the Clarence and Abel Swallow Airport

Eastmain River Bridge March 2015 Sept 2015 July 2014 Jan 2015 Airport Naming Ceremony, March 2015 July 2014

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Camp and Mine Dry

Sept 2014 Oct 2014 Jan 2015: Occupation Sept 2015 June 2015

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Maintenance Facility

Completed Approximately 6 Months Ahead of Schedule

July 2015 April 2015 Inauguration Ceremony, September 24, 2015 Oct 2015

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Primary Crusher and LNG Power Plant

Sept 2015 Oct 2015

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Diamond Processing Plant

Live Updates on Process Plant Construction at www.stornowaydiamonds.com

Oct 2014 Sept 2015 First Concrete April 7, 2015 Aug 2015 July 2015

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Open Pit Mining

Renard 2 – Renard 3 Pit Pre-stripping Commenced March 2015

R2-R3 Pre-Strip, March 5, 2015

Open Pit Mining Team, March 5, 2015

R2-R3 R65 Portal

R2-R3 Pit, May 23, 2015 Decline Ventilation, May 10, 2015

Mining Progress as of July 31 2015

1,842,582 tonnes extracted from R2/R3 and vs plan of 2,042,680 (93%)

R2-R3 Pit August 2015

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

August 2015 Sept 2015

R2-R3 R65 Portal

Decline Progress as of July 31, 2015

486m against plan of 504m (96%)

Underground Mining

Portal Development December 2014, Ramp Development Commenced March 2015

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31 The Mecheshoo Agreement, March 2012

Renard’s Social Licence

Working with Stakeholders

The Declaration of Partnership, July 2012 Environmental Exchange Group, 2011

The design of the project, and the December 2011 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, was developed in conjunction with an environmental Exchange Group that met during the course of 2011 in Mistissini. The Renard Project has been designed to minimize impact on local water quality and fish habitat, the principal concern of the Crees. The project has been “built to close”, and reclamation liabilities have been bonded 100% with the MERN In July 2012 Stornoway concluded a “Declaration of Partnership” with the communities of Chapais and Chibougamau. The Declaration of Partnership provides a framework to address issues of mutual interest such as communication, employment and economic diversification. In March 2012 Stornoway concluded the “Mecheshoo Agreement” with the Cree Nation of Mistissini and the Grand Council of the Crees (EI). The “Mecheshoo Agreement” provides for employment and business

  • pportunities, the Crees, fosters cultural, environmental and social protection,

and provides for the Crees’ participation in the project’s long term financial success.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Main Contractors at Mine Site in 2014-2015

Construction Talbon Matoush-Grimard Manseau & Perron inc MY Surveying Sakhiikan Consortium Kesi Construction Eskan Company RCM Habitation Modulaire Jos Ste-Croix Swallow-Fournier inc Kiskinshiish Camp Services Tessier Ltée Communications Telesignal SPI Santé/Sécurité Structures GB Ltée Prevost et Frères H2O Innovation Nordic Structures Bois Anixter Canada Recyclage Ungava Plomberie Chibougamau Sanivac Réseau Blasteck International Barette et fils Convoyeur Continental ASDR Environnement Installations AC Washeyaabiin Const. Industrie Fournier Biron Yves Lacombe Pétrole MJ Roche Ltée Mabarex

  • Equ. Pétrolier Lac St-Jean

Hewitt Construction Proco Corner Cast Air Creebec Revetement RHR Petronor Groupe Industriel Premium Dyno Nobel Canada Mansour Mining Techno. Groupe Robert PAR Tanguay (WEC)

Invoiced Expenses from Québec ($245M)

CHIB-CHAP-MIST MONTREAL BEAUCE ABITIBI SAGUENAY-LAC ST-JEAN GASP-BSL-COTE-NORD MAURICIE-CENTRE-SUD QUEBEC

Total of Invoiced Expenses ($290M)

Renard’s Social Licence

Local & Regional Participation – Invoiced expenses from September 2014 to August 2015

Chib.-Chap.- Mistissini. 38% QUEBEC ONTARIO OTHER PROVINCES USA Elsewhere (SA, TURKEY, SWITZERLAND) Quebec 86%

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Employment Statistics

Average of 410 people/day Working at the Renard Site in September 2015

Longueuil 43% Renard 34% Vancouver 9% Toronto 8% Chiboug/ Mistissini 6% Crees 58% Non- Crees 42% Crees 22% Non-Crees 78% Longueuil 20% Renard 75% Vancouver 2% Toronto 2% Chiboug/ Mistissini 1%

Personnel at Site

Sept 2014: 193 Sept 2014: 68

Stornoway Employees

Sept 2015: 410 Sept 2015: 290

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Innovation at Renard

Liquefied Natural Gas Power Plant

On October 21st, 2013 Stornoway announced it will proceed with an LNG fuelled gen-set option, made possible by the ability to receive regular cryogenic LNG shipments on the Renard Mine Road. The Renard LNG plant will comprise seven 2.1MW rated gas gen-sets, providing sufficient power generation capacity for the project’s normal operating specification of 9.5MW. LNG has significant advantages over traditional diesel powered gen-sets. Operating costs are estimated to be $8-$10m less annually, for an incremental capital cost of $2.6m, with 42% less greenhouse gas emissions. LNG will be purchased from Gaz-Metro in Montreal, with deliveries of three tankers per day by road. Diesel will continue to be used for the mobile mining fleet and construction activities.

Renard will be one of the first LNG powered mines in Canada, made possible by road access

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

PKC Waste Rock Overburden UG Mine Portal Process Plant Mine Waste Water Treatment Plant Collection Trench Pumping Station

Innovation at Renard

Surface Water Management

Sept 2014 Jan 2015 Mine Water Treatment Plant Oct 2015 Camp Waste Water Treatment Plant Sept 2014 Jan 2015 Camp Waste Water Treatment Plant

100% of surface precipitation and mine waste water at Renard is collected and treated before release.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Innovation at Renard

The First Diamond Mine to Dry Stack Processed Kimberlite

Processed Kimberlite Containment (PKC)

Dry stacking of processed kimberlite minimizes impacts of project on fish habitat and local water quality

Centrifuges in process plant de-water processed kimberlite (PK)… …producing a cake for re-handling. PK cake is loaded-out… …trucked… …and deposited at PKC facility with progressive reclamation.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37 37

Looking Forward (Matt Manson)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

The Challenge of Finding and Developing New Diamond Mines

“Tier 1” defined as mines with Ultimate reserves greater than US$20B: Jwaneng, Orapa, Mir, Udachnya, Venetia, Catoca, Premier

Kimberlite Discoveries Since 1870

6,800 1,000 65 7 875 420 20

1 10 100 1,000 10,000

Kimberlites Discovered Diamondiferous Economic Tier 1*

Recent Diamond Mines

Source: De Beers/SWY

Economic kimberlites represent just 1% of all discoveries made since 1870 (1.7% in Canada)

Time from Discovery to First Production Ekati (1998, BHPB, now Dominion) 7 years Diavik (2002, Rio Tinto/Dominion) 9 years Victor (2008, De Beers) 20 years Snap Lake (2008, De Beers) 11 years Karowe (2012, Lucara) 10 years Grib (2013, Lukoil) 18 years Ghaghoo (2014, Gem) 23 years Renard (2017, Stornoway) 16 years Gahcho Kué (2017, DeBeers/MPV) 21 years Bunder (2019, Rio Tinto) 15 Years

Projects are taking longer to develop

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Stornoway will be a Significant Diamond Producer

Current and Future Diamond Producers Latest 12 Month Sales/ Forecast Future Average Sales

1 De Beers (Anglo/Botswana) $6,312m 2 Alrosa (Russia) $4,901m 3 Dominion Diamond (TSX: DDC) $872m 4 Rio Tinto (ASE: RIO) $801m 5 Petra (L: PDL) $425m

6 Stornoway (note 2; TSX: SWY) $310m

7 Mountain Province (note 2; TSX: MPV) $259m 8 Gem Diamonds (TSX: GEMD) $241m 9 Lucara (TSX: LUC) $196m 10 Firestone (note 3; L: FDI) $125m 11 Others $2,558m Total $17,000m

DeBeers 37% Alrosa 29% Dominion 5% RioTinto 5% Petra 2% SWY 2% MPV 1% GEM 1% LUC 1% Firestone 1% Others 15%

Notes: 1. Renard estimated at FS average annual diamond production of 1.63 million carats, and WWW March 2014 weighted diamond price of US$190/ct, un-escalated 2. Gahcho Kué estimated at 49% of Revised FS average annual production of 4.45 million carats, and average modeled diamond price of US$118/ct, un-escalated 3. Firestone estimated at revised 2015 mine plan average annual production of 0.95 million carats at an average price of US$132/ct un-escalated

6 Stornoway (note 1; TSX: SWY) $310m

Source: Kimberly Process, WWW and Company Reports

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Renard’s Cash Flow Potential

Base Case Economics Renard is Expected to Generate Substantial Cash Flow

  • ver its first 11 years of Mining

After Tax, After Stream Operating Cash Flow of between $150 and $250 million, or $0.20 to $0.30 per share

Assumptions Mineral reserve case only Capital and operating cost parameters as established in the January 2013 Optimization Study and October 2013 LNG FS Base case diamond pricing from March 2014; No “special” diamonds. 2.5% annual real diamond price escalation C$:US$ conversion rate of C$1.10 Based on terms of Financing Transaction closed on July 8th, 2014 Assumes full conversion to equity of US$81million of Convertible Debentures giving 825 million shares outstanding.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Stornoway will sell 100% of the Renard diamond production by tender sale in Antwerp. 10 times a year, every 5 weeks. This will create a “Stornoway Sales Week” in the diamond market. To this end, Stornoway’s wholly owned subsidiary FCDC Sales and Marketing has entered into a sales and marketing agreement with the well known diamond industry broker and rough distributor Bonas-Couzyn, which will act as sales commissionaire and tender agent for arm's length market sales. Sales of diamonds under the Renard Streaming Agreement will be undertaken by Bonas-Couzyn, on an undivided basis, on behalf of FCDC and the Streamers Other than under exceptional circumstances, Stornoway will sell 100% of what it produces, will not carry a stockpile outside of normal goods-in-progress, and will be a market price taker.

Stornoway’s Diamond Sales

As a miner, Stornoway will focus on mine production and cost efficiency. Diamond sales will be by arm's length tender sales in Antwerp, 10 times a year. Stornoway will support the Québec or Canadian brand identification initiatives of its clients through chain of custody certification.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Renard’s Product

Québec Diamonds in the World Market

March 2014 Diamond Valuations (WWW International Diamond Consultants Ltd.) Kimberlite Body Valuation Sample (carats) WWW March 2014 Sample Price (US$/carat)1 WWW March 2014 Base Case Price Model (US$/carat)1 Sensitivities (Minimum to High) Renard 2 1,580 $187 $197 $178 to $222 Renard 3 2,753 $179 $157 $146 to $192 Renard 4 2,674 $101 $106 ($155)2 $100 to $174 Renard 65 997 $262 $187 $175 to $211

Notes

1. All prices in US$/carat. Samples utilizing a +1 DTC sieve size cut-off. 2. Should the Renard 4 diamond population prove to have a diamond population with a size distribution equal to the average of Renard 2 and 3, WWW have estimated that a base case diamond price model of $155 per carat based on March 2014 pricing. Source: WWW March 2014 Valuation Update

Base Case Diamond Valuation Estimates Using on Best Practice Methodology Average weighted diamond price estimate in March 2014 for the Mineral Reserves of US$190/ct (un-escalated). High Quality Production The Renard kimberlites have similar, but marginally different diamond populations exhibiting a high incidence of large white gems and only 1% boart by weight. XRT technology in Plant for Large Diamond Recovery Coarse Size Distribution in Renard 2 predicts 3 to 6 50-100ct stones and 1 to 2 +100ct stones every 100,000 carats (2-3 weeks). Plant flow sheet:

  • Primary jaw crushing to < 230mm
  • Twin DMS circuits at +1mm -19mm
  • LDR circuit at +19mm -45mm, scalable to -60mm
  • Oversize +45mm to secondary cone crusher
  • LDR and DMS tails +6mm -19mm to tertiary High

Pressure Grinding Rolls

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

Renard: Québec’s Next Major Mine

Fourteen years in the making

Diamonds

Demand underpinned by gifting traditions that are universal, aspirational and cross-cultural… …but mined: supply is limited and finite

Stornoway

Focus on budget, schedule, operating excellence, cash flow

Stornoway Diamond Corporation (TSX: SWY)

Our Priorities

www.stornowaydiamonds.com

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44 44

Thank You