Broad PFAs
Letter of Intent Applicant Town Hall
Cycle: Spring 2015
February 12, 2015
Broad PFAs Letter of Intent Applicant Town Hall Cycle: Spring 2015 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Broad PFAs Letter of Intent Applicant Town Hall Cycle: Spring 2015 February 12, 2015 Agenda Submitting Questions: Introductions Submit questions via the About PCORI chat function in Meeting Bridge. Research Goals Research Areas of
Cycle: Spring 2015
February 12, 2015
2
Submitting Questions:
Submit questions via the chat function in Meeting Bridge. Ask a question via phone (an
your questions).
3
Bridget Gaglio, MPH, PhD Program Officer, Communication and Dissemination Research Stanley Ip, MD Senior Program Officer, Clinical Effective Research Beth Kosiak, PhD Program Officer Improving Healthcare System Soknorntha Prum, MPH Contracts Associate Contracts Management and Administration
research still has not answered many questions patients face.
treatment is best for them.
information they can understand and use.
5
PCORI helps people make informed health care decisions, and improves health care delivery and outcomes, by producing and promoting high integrity, evidence-based information that comes from research guided by patients, caregivers and the broader health care community.
8
9
CER includes:
benefits of two or more approaches to healthcare All applicants should:
10
11
Examples of CEA
(including non-adjusted life-years) to compare two or more alternatives
approaches as the criterion for choosing the preferred alternative
Based on PCORI’s authorizing legislation, PCORI is not permitted to fund studies
12
Other types of research we do not fund
NOTE: PCORI does fund studies that explore the burden of costs on patients—for example,
14
long-term management that have not been adequately addressed previously.
biological, clinical, socioeconomic and other factors, within proposed studies.
Available Funds: Up To $32 Million Total Direct Cost: $2 million Maximum Project Period: 3 years
Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
15
clinical guidelines, or other credible evidence reviews.
treatment, screening, diagnosis, or management that are known to be efficacious but have not been adequately compared in previous studies.
navigators
16
electronic technologies
(such as standing orders)
patients and providers
teams, peer navigators, community health workers)
Available Funds: Up To $16 Million Total Direct Cost: $ 5 Million in large awards / $1.5 Million in small awards Maximum Project Period: 5 years in large awards/ 3 years in small awards
Improving Healthcare Systems
17
coordination of care across healthcare settings
ineffective, duplicative, or wasteful care provided to patients
Choosing Wisely) with systems incentives and/or redesign to simultaneously elicit patient preferences and reduce harms faced by patients
18
The Communication and Dissemination Research (CDR) program seeks to fund projects that address critical knowledge gaps in the communication and dissemination process:
caregivers, and clinicians
To enable patients and caregivers to make the best possible decisions in choosing among available options for care and treatment.
Available Funds: Up To $8 Million Total Direct Cost : $1.5 million Maximum Project Period: 3 years
Communication & Dissemination Research
evidence by patients and clinicians
evidence by patients and clinicians
clinicians
19
disadvantage members of a particular group and limit their ability to achieve
studies that identify best options for eliminating disparities
Available Funds: Up to $8 Million Total Direct Cost: $1.5 Million Maximum Project Period: 3 years
20
Addressing Disparities
21
centered outcomes (PCOs), including health, health care, and patient-reported
be most effective for eliminating disparities in outcomes
with a focus on eliminating disparities
patient populations at risk for disparities
22
Program Area Total Direct Cost Limit Project Duration Limit Greater than Request
research results
Cross-cutting Standards
24
well-thought out plan
applications.
matter to patients within the context of patient preferences?
patients and caregivers
25
comparators, and outcomes
26
critical gaps identified by clinical guidelines developers and/or recent relevant systematic review.
27
healthcare system, laboratory or manufacturer, unit of local, state, or federal government)
healthcare system and US efforts in the area of patient-centered research can be clearly shown.
This is a competitive LOI screening process:
submit a full application New screening LOI process for Spring 2015 cycle:
31
interest
characteristics and requirements
32
33
Program Area Page Limit References or Citations
(https://pcori.fluxx.io)
browsers only
individuals:
system
Review’ button on the save and review page and on the side navigation pane
What When
37
Visit pcori.org/apply
Schedule a Call with a Program Officer
Contact our Helpdesk
technical inquiries)
39
If we are unable to address your question during this time, e-mail the Helpdesk at pfa@pcori.org.