development of a user friendly framework for geospatial
play

DEVELOPMENT OF A USER FRIENDLY FRAMEWORK FOR GEOSPATIAL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DEVELOPMENT OF A USER FRIENDLY FRAMEWORK FOR GEOSPATIAL IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL PFAS SOURCE ZONES Jennifer Guelfo, PhD June 12, 2017 1 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW PFAS PFAS in U.S. Source Zone Overview Drinking H 2 O EvaluaJon


  1. DEVELOPMENT OF A USER FRIENDLY FRAMEWORK FOR GEOSPATIAL IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL PFAS SOURCE ZONES Jennifer Guelfo, PhD June 12, 2017 1

  2. PRESENTATION OVERVIEW PFAS PFAS in U.S. Source Zone Overview Drinking H 2 O EvaluaJon • Terminology/ • UCMR3 data • Key PFAS sources chemistry • Knowledge • GeospaJal eval. • Uses/regulaJon gaps framework 2

  3. PFAS OVERVIEW: TERMINOLOGY & STRUCTURE Per fluoroalkane sulfonates: Per fluoroalkyl carboxylates: Examples: Examples: m=3 PFBS m=2 PFBA m=5 PFHxS m=4 PFHxA m=7 PFOS m=6 PFOA Per = fully fluorinated alkyl tail. 3

  4. PFAS OVERVIEW: TERMINOLOGY & STRUCTURE Per fluoroalkane sulfonates: Per fluoroalkyl carboxylates: Examples: Examples: m=3 PFBS m=2 PFBA m=5 PFHxS m=4 PFHxA m=7 PFOS m=6 PFOA Poly = parJally fluorinated alkyl tail. Poly fluoroalkyl substances: F F H O m=5 6:2 FtS m=7 8:2 FtS O - F S F m H 2 F O 4

  5. PFAS OVERVIEW: TERMINOLOGY & STRUCTURE Per fluoroalkane sulfonates: Per fluoroalkyl carboxylates: Examples: Examples: m=3 PFBS m=2 PFBA m=5 PFHxS m=4 PFHxA m=7 PFOS m=6 PFOA + Poly = Per Per & polyfluoro alkyl substances (PFAS) Poly fluoroalkyl substances: F F H O m=5 6:2 FtS m=7 8:2 FtS O - F S F m H 2 F O 5

  6. PFAS OVERVIEW: TERMINOLOGY & STRUCTURE Buck, Robert C., et al. "Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: terminology, classificaJon, and origins." Integrated 6 environmental assessment and management 7.4 (2011): 513-541.

  7. PFAS OVERVIEW: TERMINOLOGY & STRUCTURE 3000 + new PFASs+ transformaJon products = relevant PFASs Buck, Robert C., et al. "Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: terminology, classificaJon, and origins." Integrated 7 environmental assessment and management 7.4 (2011): 513-541.

  8. PFAS OVERVIEW: CHEMISTRY & USES ElectronegaJvity = strong, Small size of fluorine = polar covalent bond F shields C ResulJng PFAS properJes: • Strong acidity (low pK a ) • Thermal stability • Chemical stability • Hydrophobic & lipophobic • Surfactant Kissa, Erik, ed. Fluorinated surfactants and repellents . Vol. 97. CRC Press, 2001. Banks, Ronald Eric, Bruce E. Smart, and J. C. Tatlow, eds. Organofluorine chemistry: principles and commercial applica:ons . Springer Science & 8 Business Media, 2013.

  9. PFAS OVERVIEW: CHEMISTRY & USES ElectronegaJvity = strong, Small size of fluorine = polar covalent bond F shields C ResulJng PFAS properJes: • Strong acidity (low pK a ) • Thermal stability • Chemical stability • Hydrophobic & lipophobic • Surfactant Kissa, Erik, ed. Fluorinated surfactants and repellents . Vol. 97. CRC Press, 2001. Banks, Ronald Eric, Bruce E. Smart, and J. C. Tatlow, eds. Organofluorine chemistry: principles and commercial applica:ons . Springer Science & 9 Business Media, 2013.

  10. 70 ng/L ∑ PFOA, PFAS OVERVIEW: REGULATION Drinking Water Health Advisories for PFOA, PFOS 70 ng/L: individually or in combinaJon RfD * Body Wt. RelaJve Source = Water Quality * ContribuJon Standard DW ingesJon Why the differences? Advisory or standard Source • VT: same RfD as EPA, different DW ingesJon PFOS USEPA LHA • NJ: different RfD based 20 ng/L ∑ PFOA, PFOS Vermont different endpoint- liver weight 14 ng/L PFOA, 10 ng/L vs. developmental delay. PFNA New Jersey Informa:on courtesy of Dr. David Klein 10

  11. PFAS IN THE U.S.: UCMR3 DATA EPA UCMR Data 2013-2015: • 4120 Systems > 10,000 • 800 systems ≤ 10,000 • No private systems • MulJple PFAAs/sample • 4% detecJon rate (~200); which are ‘ impacted ’ ? • 64 systems > LHA • 122 systems > NJ (but MRL=20 ng/L) • 151 systems > VT Data reflect only samples with PFAA detec:ons 11 Hu, Xindi C., et al. "DetecJon of poly-and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in US drinking water linked to industrial sites, military fire training areas, and wastewater treatment plants." Environmental science & technology leCers 3.10 (2016): 344-350.

  12. PFAS IN THE U.S.: UCMR3 DATA EPA UCMR Data 2013-2015: • [PFAAs] 10-7000 ng/L • [PFOS] = max overall • PFOA most frequent detect • Groundwater in ~80% of detects • 2818 GW/GU systems, 2691 SW systems • Average GW [PFAA] tot > SW [PFAA] tot • Overall: GW % detect > SW % detect G = groundwater S = Surface water 12 O = DetecJon rate (right axis)

  13. PFAS IN THE U.S.: UCMR3 DATA 13 Is UCMR representa]ve? • No UCMR detects in VT, including Bennington, Pownal but impacts present • Impacts present in areas not sampled (e.g. Hoosick Falls, NY) • 0.5% of small systems in U.S. sampled (Hu, 2016) • [PFAA] S > [PFAA] L but S = small sample size

  14. PFAS IN THE U.S.: UCMR3 DATA 14 Data warrant targeted screening of community, private groundwater wells; need efficient, effec]ve design of well screening programs.

  15. PFAS IN THE U.S.: KEY CHALLENGES Finding sources: • Numerous uses/applicaJons = numerous potenJal sources • Low target concentraJons = small releases, indirect sources relevant • Unconsolidated or missing informaJon on current, historical sources May cause: inefficient sampling plans, failure to ID all relevant sources, inability to determine source, increased Jme required to reduce risks to human health, environment 15

  16. PFAS SOURCE ZONES: GEOSPATIAL FRAMEWORK Data Sources: • Landfills • Fire staJons • Fire Training Areas • Airports • Manufacturing faciliJes 1960-2012 • IdenJfied industrial codes known to use or produce PFAS Hazard = (Release Prob.) * (Years of OperaJon) 16

  17. PFAS SOURCE ZONES: GEOSPATIAL FRAMEWORK Raster Grid and Points PFAS Hazard Map City of Providence How do hazards compare to groundwater vulnerability? 17

  18. PFAS SOURCE ZONES: GEOSPATIAL FRAMEWORK Vulnerability based on proximity to: • Drinking water aquifers • Wellhead protecJon areas Hazard vs. Risk: • ↑ Hazard in pop. centers but… • GW not classified for drinking • ↑ Risk in rural areas for small, community scale systems GW Recharge Risk = Hazard * Vulnerability 18

  19. PFAS SOURCE ZONES: GEOSPATIAL FRAMEWORK GeospaJal future work: • Assist in sample point selecJon, sampling, analysis • Ground truth geospaJal analysis • Pending source data availability , implement in regions w/GW data • Key quesJons: • Can we evaluate based on potenJal for release vs. known use/release? Buffered • RelaJve importance of locaJon community info for each source type wells Wells = exposure potenJal 19

  20. Brown University Superfund Research Program • Dr. Sco{ Frickel • Thomas Marlow • Amy Parmenter, RIDOH • Dr. Eric Suuberg • Suuberg lab group

  21. QuesJons? 21

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend