biofuel production and water in the southw est
play

Biofuel Production and Water in the Southw est WRRC Brownbag - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Biofuel Production and Water in the Southw est WRRC Brownbag November 14, 2012 Kimberly Ogden and Robert Arnold Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering University of Arizona 85721 Tucson, AZ Where does on Energy Come From


  1. Biofuel Production and Water in the Southw est WRRC Brownbag November 14, 2012 Kimberly Ogden and Robert Arnold Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering University of Arizona 85721 Tucson, AZ

  2. Where does on Energy Come From Currently?

  3. Where do we get our current energy? Oil Coal Large: Hoover Hydroelectric 2000 MW Natural Gas Nuclear

  4. World Consumption (Millions tonnes of oil equiv) Coal Hydroelectric Nuclear Energy Natural gas Oil 2009

  5. Where are the Largest Reserves of Oil and Natural gas?

  6. Natural Gas Reserves (trillion cubic meters) 16 Asia Pacific 77 Middle East 9 N. America 62 Europe and 8 S. C. Ame 15 Africa Eurasia

  7. Coal Reserves 16 S. C. America 272 Europe Eurasia 246 N. America 250 Asia Pacific 32 Africa 1.4 Middle East

  8. Energy and Water Demand is also influenced by?

  9. Sources of Renewable Energy?

  10. Renewable Energy Technologies Solar Thermal Solar Thermal Wind Biomass Biomass Wind Photovoltaic Geothermal Hydro-Electric Photovoltaic Hydroelectric Geo Thermal 12

  11. Onl nly hal half of of al all petr etroleum us uses es can b can be e replaced b by etha ethanol

  12. Other Products ?

  13. What about Algae? From the NRC prepublication copy of: Sustainable Development of Algal Biofuels in the United States, ( 2012) …production of algal biofuels to meet even 5% of U.S. transportation fuel needs could create unsustainable demands for energy, water, and nutrient resources…

  14. Foundation for Estimating Algal Biofuel demands for Land, Water, N,P Assumptions Parameters 1. Algal productivity is 10 g/m 2 -d 1. Objective: Satisfy 5% of US demand for 2. Y N = 16 g dry algae/g N transportation fuel consumed (data) 2. Oil demand in US = 6.9 3. Y P = 115 g dry algae/g P BBL/yr or ~1B MT/yr consumed 3. 2/3 of petroleum demand 4. Cost of nitrogen—$1.1/kg N is for transport 5. Phosphorus—$3.3/kg P 4. 30% of algal CDW can be converted to biofuel 19

  15. What is the Land requirement for algal biofuel production? Results of analysis Assumptions and parameters 1. Surface area requirement is 1. Algal productivity is 10g ~11,747 mi 2 (25,000 km 2 ; 7.5M CDW/m 2 -day acres) for production of 5% of 2. Biofuel mass is 30% of transportation fuel CDW (reminder) 2. This is 10% bigger than 3. Objective is to produce 3.3 Maryland x 10 7 MT of biofuel per 3. And about 20% bigger than Lake year (1.1 x 10 8 MT algal Erie. CDW/yr) 20

  16. How much Water would we lose to evaporation in Tucson? Assumptions and parameters 1. The pan evaporation rate in Tucson is 80 inches per year. 2. The precipitation rate is about 12 inches per year, for a net evaporation rate of 68 inches or Results of analysis 5.67 feet/yr. 1. Rate of water loss due to 3. Representative value of water in evaporation is ~ 43 million AFY. the Southwest is $125/acre-foot. 2. This is about 2.6x the average flow in 4. Required surface area is 7.5 the Colorado River. million acres 3. Δ cost for biofuel production would be $5.4B/yr ($0.56/gal biofuel produced) 4. Water requirement is >1,450 21 gallons/gallon biofuel.

  17. What are the N&P Demands for a significant Algal Biofuels industry? Assumptions and Results 1. Annual demand for biofuel is 3.3 x 10 7 MT/yr (0.97B gal/yr—5% of demand for transportation fuels) 2. Y N is 16g algae dry weight/g N 3. Y P is 115g algae dry weight/gP 4. Δ demand for N: 6.3 x 10 6 MT N/yr—~ half of the nitrogen use in agriculture—cost equals $6.9B/yr or $0.71/gal biofuel. 5. Δ demand for P: 8.7 x 10 5 tons P/yr—17% of total phosphorus fertilizer use in US—cost equals $2.9B/yr 22 or $0.31/gal.

  18. Is Wastewater an alternative source of N,P? Assumptions and parameters Results of analysis 1. Wastewater N content—40 mg/L Nitrogen first: as available N 1. Population equivalent to provide 2. Wastewater P content—3 mg/L 6.25 x 10 6 MT of nitrogen/yr is as P 1.14 billion people (3x US popn) 3. Wastewater production rate— 2. Reminder—Cost savings is 100 gpcd $6.9B/yr, or $0.71/gallon of fuel. 4. Cost of N as fertilizer is $1.1/kg 5. Cost of P as fertilizer is $3.3/kg Phosphorus second: 1. Population equivalent to provide 8.7 x 10 5 MT P/yr is 2.12 billion people (≈ popn of China & India) 2. Cost savings is $2.9B/yr, but only $0.31/gallon of fuel 23

  19. Can we use Wastewater Instead of a Commercially valuable Water Resource? Assumptions and parameters Result of analysis: There are 3.26 x 10 5 gal/AF. 1. 1. Population equivalent 2. Biofuel development requires to generate 1.4 x 10 13 42.6 MAFY (reminder) gal/yr of treated 3. Per capita rate of wastewater wastewater is 426 generation is 100 gpcd. million. 2. This is 1.15x the US population 24

  20. Summary—Value and Limitations of Wastewater in Biofuels industry Category Result N-sufficiency (5% industry Population equivalent—1.14 demand) billion N-value $6.9B/yr or $0.71/gal P-sufficiency (5% industry Population equivalent—2.12 demand) billion P-value $2.9B/yr or $0.30/gal Water sufficiency Population equivalent—426 million Water value $5.4B/yr or $0.56/gal • Overall conclusion—use of effluent for water algal biofuels industry could make a substantial cost difference—were there enough to go around. 25

  21. What is UA doing to help solve the problem? Biomass Sweet Sorghum to Ethanol, butanol, other Algae to Biofuels bio-oils

  22. Current Research Topics • Productivity yield – 10 g/m 2 day – new reactor strategies • Nutrient affects on lipid yield • Wastewater and Recycled water studies • Nutrient recycle • Life cycle assessment • Results shown today are for salt water Nannochloropsis species algae

  23. Why microalgae?? 1. High oil content 2. Fast growth rate and high biomass yield 3. Grow in arid land and wastewater 4. Not interfere with food security concern 5. Less GHGs emission 6. Grown in non-arable land and industrial flue gas as carbon source 28

  24. Cultivation Open Mixotrophic PBR Pond Processes Harvesting Dewatering Centrifugation Advanced Flocculation Filtration Processes Non solvent Wet solvent Direct Conversion Extraction Extraction Extraction Process Process Hydrothermal Pyrolysis Esterification Crude Lipid Liquefaction Gasification Clean Up Lipid Extracted Algae Crude Clean Residual Syngas Oil Methylester Lipid Lipid Feed and Extract Extract Extract Fertilizer Fuel Advanced Chemicals Conversion Nov, 2011

  25. Traditional Raceway Design UA ARID Raceway Design

  26. Ash Free Dry Weight 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 AFDW g/L 1.0 0.8 North 0.6 Middle 0.4 South 0.2 Arid 0.0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 Time (days) After Inoculation 33

  27. 35 Conventional - Min ARID - Min Conventional - Max ARID - Max 30 Conventional - Avg ARID - Avg 25 Temperature (°C) 20 15 10 5 0 1/24 2/3 2/13 2/23 3/5 3/15 3/25 4/4 4/14 4/24 -5 34

  28. Lipid content vs time 35 30 Lipid content (%) 25 20 15 ARID Lipid % 10 Raceway Lipid% 5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Time (days) 35

  29. 100% 90% C20:5w3 80% Fatty Acid Composition % C20:4w6 70% C18:3 60% C18:2 50% C18:1 40% C18:0 30% C16:1 20% C16:0 10% C14:0 0% Arid Raceway Lab Fatty acid profile comparison at Stationary phase in three different culture systems 36

  30. 1.8 100% 90% 1.6 80% 1.4 70% C18:1 1.2 Biomass g/L 60% C18:0 1 50% C16:1 0.8 40% C16:0 30% 0.6 C14:0 20% 0.4 10% 0.2 0% 0 1st 3rd 5th 7th 9th 12th 0 5 10 15 Days Productivity of Nannochloropsis salina with 50% Recycled Water 37

  31. 90% Water Recycle 0.9 0.8 0.7 1st.G 0.6 Biomass (g/L) 2nd.G 0.5 3rd.G 0.4 4th.G 0.3 5th. G 6TH.G 0.2 7th.G 0.1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Days

  32. Lipid Productivity with Water Recycle 70 Lipid Content - Percentage of Dry 60 50 Weight 40 50% recycle 30 90% recycle 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Generation

  33. CCMP 1776 Growth Curve Using Different Percentages of Centrate in Normal Medium Minus N,P 12 Optical Density 680nm (A) 10 50 -100% 8 25% 6 10% 4 0% 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Time (days) 40

  34. Comparative FAME profiles for control, 75% centrate and raceway 40.000 35.000 30.000 mg FAME/g dw Undentified 25.000 C18:3n9 C18:2n9 20.000 C18:1n9 15.000 C18:0 C16:1n9 10.000 C16:0 C14:0 5.000 41 0.000 Normal 15% Centrate Raceway

  35. Research Conclusions • Arid reactor system has potential to increase productivity from 10 g/m 2 day – long term cultivation studies required • Water can be recycled 5 to 6 times with little affect on productivity – total water recycle • Wastewater is advantagous to algal growth – need to supplement with some trace nutrients • Combination of recycled water, wastewater or brackish and nutrient recycle required to have sustainable production of fuel from microalgae.

  36. Food AND Fuel

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend