price determination of forest feedstocks under different next - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

price determination of forest feedstocks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

price determination of forest feedstocks under different next - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A geographically explicit approach for price determination of forest feedstocks under different next generation biofuel production scenarios The case of Sweden Ismail Ouraich Postdoctoral Researcher, LTU 1 Outline Objective &


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

A geographically explicit approach for price determination of forest feedstocks under different next generation biofuel production scenarios – The case of Sweden

Ismail Ouraich Postdoctoral Researcher, LTU

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Outline

  • Objective & Motivation
  • Model description

– Demand, Supply, Geography

  • Soft linkage with BeWhere-Sweden
  • Some initial results
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Objective & Motivation

  • A price determination model

– Based on a simple demand/supply framework – Geographically explicit at gridcell level

  • Focus on Swedish forest feedstock markets

domestically

– No trade linkages, etc.

  • ”Soft-link” to other high-end models

– BeWhere-Sweden (primary focus) – PE, CGE, models

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

  • Generate a matrix of new “market” prices;
  • The “market” prices matrix is used as an input to

the BeWhere-Sweden model

– Represents an updated cost matrix for the forest feedstocks, which is geographically explicit

  • Reiterate the process for all the scenarios in the

BeWhere model

– to simulate demand-side pressures on the forest feedstock markets

”Soft-Link” to BeWhere-Sweden

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Model description

Supply & Harvest Cost

  • Given at gridcell level

for 7 feedstock types

– 7 raw forest-based feedstock

  • Sawlogs, pulpwood,

branches&tops, and stumps

  • Final felling and

thinning

Demand

  • Estimated via

BeWhere-Sweden

– Provides initial data to be calibrated using a distance-decay framework – Need to account for demand competition among different locations

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Model description

  • Regional supply curves are estimated based on

gridcell-level data on

– Forest biomass availability – Harvesting costs

  • Regional supply curves constructed as a

cumulative step-function of merit order

  • Demand schedule at gridcell level from

BeWhere-Sweden

– Estimated using a distance-decay method

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Model description

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Model description

  • Prices are determined based on regionalized

juxtaposition between gridcell demand and regional supply

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Model description

  • Supply and cost of the forest feedstock assumed

fixed initially

– Can be potentially changed via alternative scenarios introduced as “supply shifts” (e.g. change in harvest technology, supply shocks due to climate change, etc.)

  • The key element in the model is the “distance-

decayed” adjusted demand

– The concept of “distance decay” stems from Newtonian physics on gravity – Used extensively in “gravity models” of trade

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Model description

  • The objective of introducing the “distance-decay”

calibration is to account for the potential friction among different demand nodes

– i.e. potential competition

  • In the model, we compute the “distance-decay”

calibrated demand as: with

𝑌𝐸 =

𝑗,𝑛 𝐵𝑒𝑘

𝑌𝐸 +

𝑗,𝑛

𝑌𝐸 𝑗,𝑛,𝑜

𝑒𝑓𝑑𝑏𝑧 𝑜≠𝑛

𝑌𝐸 =

𝑗,𝑛,𝑜 𝑒𝑓𝑑𝑏𝑧

𝛽 × 𝑌𝐸𝑗,𝑛 × 1 − 𝑒𝑛,𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑏𝑦

𝛿

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Initial results

Demand - Pulpwood final felling

BAU scenario 10TWh scenario 20TWh scenario

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Initial results

Adjusted demand - Pulpwood final felling

BAU scenario 10TWh scenario 20TWh scenario

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Initial results

Demand - Pulpwood thinning

BAU scenario 10TWh scenario 20TWh scenario

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Initial results

Adjusted demand - Pulpwood thinning

BAU scenario 10TWh scenario 20TWh scenario

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Summary of findings

Pulpwood from final felling and thinning

  • Spatial distribution of demand for pulpwood

displays substantial changes

– BAU vs. 10TWh and BAU vs. 20TWh

  • No substantial change observed in the case of

10TWh vs. 20TWh scenarios

– Minor changes observed for a limited number of gridcells – Changes observed only in terms of magnitude of the level of demand

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Initial results

Demand – Branches&Tops final felling

BAU scenario 10TWh scenario 20TWh scenario

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Initial results

Adjusted demand – Branches&Tops final felling

BAU scenario 10TWh scenario 20TWh scenario

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Initial results

Demand – Branches&Tops thinning

BAU scenario 10TWh scenario 20TWh scenario

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Initial results

Adjusted demand – Branches&Tops thinning

BAU scenario 10TWh scenario 20TWh scenario

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Summary of findings

Branches&Tops from final felling and thinning

  • Spatial distribution of demand for branches&tops

displays substantial changes

– BAU vs. 10TWh and BAU vs. 20TWh

  • No substantial change observed in the case of

10TWh vs. 20TWh scenarios

– Minor changes observed for a limited number of gridcells – Changes observed only in terms of magnitude of the level of demand

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Initial results

Price for biomass

Scenario 1: 10 TWh Scenario 2: 20 TWh Level (in MEUR/TWh) Percent change (in %) Level (in MEUR/TWh) Percent change (in %) Avg Max Min Avg Max Min Avg Max Min Avg Max Min Final felling Sawlogs 19,84 20,71 19,08 0,23 1,13 0,002 19,84 20,71 19,08 0,23 1,13 0,002 Pulpwood 13,28 16,73 12,66 0,93 18,95 0,004 13,28 16,73 12,66 0,93 18,95 0,004 Branches & Tops 13,94 15,68 13,60 0,45 7,17 0,003 13,94 15,68 13,60 0,45 7,17 0,001 Stumps 21,23 22,08 20,75 n.a. n.a. n.a. 21,23 22,08 20,75 n.a. n.a. n.a. Thinning Sawlogs 24,05 25,74 22,50 n.a. n.a. n.a. 24,06 25,74 22,50 n.a. n.a. n.a. Pulpwood 16,36 20,51 14,95 0,99 14,19 0,01 16,36 20,51 14,95 0,99 14,19 0,01 Branches & Tops 15,57 16,80 14,87 0,38 1,91 0,01 15,57 16,80 14,87 0,38 1,91 0,01 Stumps n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Initial results – Price

Pulpwood final felling – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Initial results – Price

Pulpwood final felling – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Initial results – Price

Pulpwood thinning – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Initial results – Price

Pulpwood thinning – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Summary of findings

Pulpwood from final felling and thinning

  • Spatial location of price changes matches

expectations

– Driven primarily by the spatial distribution of supply and demand

  • Spatial distribution of price changes varies little

across simulation scenarios

– Price changes more pronounced for pulpwood from final felling vs. thinning – The spatial distribution more dispersed for pulpwood from thinning vs. final felling

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Initial results – Price

Branches&Tops final felling – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Initial results – Price

Branches&Tops final felling – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Initial results – Price

Branches&Tops thinning – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Initial results – Price

Branches&Tops thinning – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Summary of findings

Branches&Tops from final felling and thinning

  • Similar results to pulpwood

– Spatial location of price change driven by the spatial distribution of supply and demand

  • Spatial distribution of price changes varies little

across simulation scenarios

– Price changes more pronounced for pulpwood from final felling vs. thinning – The spatial distribution more dispersed for pulpwood from thinning vs. final felling

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Summary & Conclusions

  • Spatial location of price changes matches

expectations for pulpwood and branches&tops

– Primary driver is the spatial distribution of supply and demand

  • Spatial distribution of price changes differs for

pulpwood and branche&tops based on the harvesting operation

– i.e. final felling or thinning

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Summary & Conclusions

  • Spatial distribution of price changes remains

unchanged between the energy scenarios

– i.e. 10TWh and 20TWh

  • Price changes more pronounced for pulpwood

from final felling vs. thinning

  • The spatial distribution more dispersed for

pulpwood from thinning vs. final felling

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Potential future work

  • ”Soft-link” with more

complex economic models

– I-O, PE, CGE models

  • Geographically explicit

– But at higher degree of aggregation (e.g. county- level)

  • Allows for more complex

analysis

– Welfare impact evaluation – Tax and/or subsidy policy – Second-degree effects – Etc.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

THANK YOU

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Additional slides

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Initial results

Demand - Sawlogs final felling

BAU scenario 10TWh scenario 20TWh scenario

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Initial results

Demand - Sawlogs thinning

BAU scenario 10TWh scenario 20TWh scenario

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Initial results

Demand - Stumps final felling

BAU scenario 10TWh scenario 20TWh scenario

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Initial results – Regional supply

Sawlogs final felling – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Initial results – Regional supply

Sawlogs final felling – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Initial results – National supply

Sawlogs final felling – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

Initial results – National supply

Sawlogs final felling – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Initial results – National supply

Pulpwood final felling – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Initial results – National supply

Pulpwood final felling – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Initial results – National supply

Branches&Tops final felling – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

Initial results – National supply

Branches&Tops final felling – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Initial results – Regional supply

Stumps final felling – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Initial results – Regional supply

Stumps final felling – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Initial results – National supply

Stumps final felling – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

Initial results – National supply

Stumps final felling – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

Initial results – Regional supply

Sawlogs thinning – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

Initial results – Regional supply

Sawlogs thinning – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

Initial results – National supply

Sawlogs thinning – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

Initial results – National supply

Sawlogs thinning – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

Initial results – National supply

Pulpwood thinning – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

Initial results – National supply

Pulpwood thinning – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

Initial results – National supply

Branches&Tops thinning – 10TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

Initial results – National supply

Branches&Tops thinning – 20TWh

Supply Demand Price (%change)

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60

Initial results

Price spatial distribution - Pulpwood

Final felling – 10TWh Thinning – 10TWh

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61

Initial results

Price spatial distribution - Pulpwood

Final felling – 20TWh Thinning – 20TWh

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62

Initial results

Price spatial distribution – Branche&Tops

Final felling – 10TWh Thinning – 10TWh

slide-63
SLIDE 63

63

Initial results

Price spatial distribution – Branches&Tops

Final felling – 20TWh Thinning – 20TWh