Session 5:
December 10, 2014
Beyond the Basics: The Art and Science of Strip Interpretation
2014 Fetal Monitoring Lunch & Learn Series
1
Beyond the Basics: The Art and Science of Strip Interpretation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
2014 Fetal Monitoring Lunch & Learn Series Beyond the Basics: The Art and Science of Strip Interpretation Session 5: December 10, 2014 1 Wisconsin Association for Perinatal Care (WAPC) 2 Faculty Chris Van Mullem, RNC, MS Clinical
Session 5:
1
2
3
– Registrants must attend full session and complete evaluation to receive contact hours
– None to report
– None
– None
– The speaker does not endorse the use of any particular medications or products as part of this educational session
– The speaker may discuss the off-label use of misoprostol and terbutaline as they relate to labor and delivery.
– 12/31/2014
4
5
The content presented today is a case study. Components of this case were chosen based on their applicability to achieve learning objectives for this presentation. Do not assume the patient featured in the case was cared for by the instructor or at the facility at which the instructor is employed. The discussion will focus on interpretation of the electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) tracings for the purpose of education. At times, the discussion may lead to the care decisions made based on EFM interpretation. IF the instructor shares details regarding actual or potential care decisions, please note those decisions do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the instructor, a particular provider, the standard of care for any particular institution or facility, or of WAPC.
6
At the conclusion of the session, participants will be able to:
baseline
fetal heart rate tracings
7
8
– ACOG (2009) Practice Bulletin #106 "Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Nomenclature, Interpretation and General Management Principles” – AWHONN-endorsed and incorporated in fetal monitoring curriculum – American College of Nurse Midwives – American Academy of Family Practice
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2009, July). ACOG Practice Bulletin #106: Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Nomenclature, Interpretation, and General Management Principles. Washington, D.C.: Author
9
– Nomenclature – Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation (categories)
based on categories
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2009, July). ACOG Practice Bulletin #106: Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Nomenclature, Interpretation, and General Management Principles. Washington, D.C.: Author
10
11
12
13
Patient is a 24 year old G5P2022 female at 23w1d with EDD of 11/18/2014 by US done today who initially presented to triage with complaint of lower abdominal cramping. No prenatal care. FHR were unable to trace, so US was obtained showing fetal tachycardia to 210-240bpm with infrequent baseline rate of 110. Breech, AC 47%, EFW 561 g, (39%), BPP 6/8 Patient reports + fetal movements Patient history not contributory. BP 100/54. P 79, BMI 19.97, Spo2 98% She was admitted for observation to L&D.
ectopic pacemaker above bundle of HIS
most commonly within AV node
Effect:
polyhydramios, scalp edema, ascites
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Causes:
Treatment:
36
37
38
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
60
– fax: 608-285-5004 – email: wapc@perinatalweb.org
61
62