Bellevue in 2020 Update on Key Demographic Characteristics Kate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1

Bellevue in 2020

Update on Key Demographic Characteristics

Kate Nesse (knesse@bellevuewa.gov) Gwen Rousseau (grousseau@bellevuewa.gov) City of Bellevue, Community Development Bellevue Network on Aging February 6, 2020

Agenda

• 1. Background
• 2. Economic Expansion &

Hidden Human Capital

• 3. Income Inequality
• 4. Changing Residential

Character

• 5. Collecting Accurate Data

in the 2020 Census

2

Background

3

Puget Sound Region:

2.75%

• f national

population growth

Economic Expansion: Perspective on growth

4

Jobs grew by 18% but population grew by only 14% Implications:

• Longer commutes
• Higher housing

prices

126,000 130,000 134,000 138,000 142,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Job Growth Target

Jobs Planned Jobs

Source: Puget Sound Regional Council. 2019. Special Tabulation of Total Population. & City of

• Bellevue. 2015. Comprehensive Plan.

55,000 57,000 59,000 61,000 63,000 65,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Housing Growth Target

Houing Units Planned Housing Units

Source: Office of FInancial Management. 2019. April 1 Housing Units, Washington State; Puget Sound Regional Council. 2019. Special Tabulation of Total Population; City of Bellevue. 2015. Comprehensive Plan.

Economic Expansion: Many H1-B visa recipients

5

1,296 accepted

H-1B visa applications from companies headquartered in Bellevue (2018) Company (location) 2018 Amazon (Seattle) 6,255 Microsoft (Redmond) 4,471 T-Mobile (Bellevue) 318 Expedia (Bellevue/Seattle) 287

Washington’s Largest H1-B Visa Applicants

Economic Expansion: Many H1-B visa recipients

6

Implication:

• Highly capable

population cannot work due to immigration issues

0% 20% 40% 60% No High School Diploma High School Diploma College Degree Post-graduate Education

Women Not in The Labor Force

All Puget Sound Women Bellevue Non-Citizens Bellevue Citizens

Source: Integrated Public Use Microdata Sample. 2018 American Community Survey (1-year estimates), published by University of Minnesota.

Income Inequality

7

28% increase in the

gap between the average household income for the

top 20% and the bottom 20% of

households (2010-2018)

$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 $500,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Income by Quintile (2018 $)

Lowest Quintile Second Quintile Third Quintile Fourth Quintile Highest Quintile

Source: US Census Bureau. 2010-2018 American Community Surveys (1-year estimates), table B19081

Income Inequality

8

45% of households

with total income under full time minimum wage ($28,080) support more than 1 person Implications:

• There is substantial

financial need in Bellevue Employment Status of Household Head Employed 30% Unemployed 0.5% Not in Labor Force 70%

Households with Total Income Below Full Time Minimum Wage

9

Residential Character: Multi-Family Now Studios & 1 Beds 34% increase

in small homes

20% 5% 6% 6% 2% 13% 15% 13% 51% 32% 12% 34% 26% 22% 31% 41% 60% 19% 68% 49% 50% 52% 63% 41% 38% 27% 32% 11% 16% 12% 14% 5% 10% 2% 1% 1% 1%

Before 1940 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010+

Multi-Family Housing By Year Built

5+ bedrooms 4 bedrooms 3 bedrooms 2 bedrooms 1 bedrooms 0 bedrooms

US Census Bureau. Integrated Public Use Microdata Sample. 2013-2017 ACS, 5% sample.

10 10 10

Residential Character: Single-Family Homes Get Bigger 2% decrease

in family-size homes

27% increase

in very large homes

23% 20% 7% 3% 3% 2% 2% 0% 0% 29% 45% 50% 33% 32% 34% 24% 21% 16% 29% 18% 31% 41% 48% 49% 52% 48% 54% 10% 15% 7% 21% 14% 12% 16% 23% 19% 4% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 4% 6% 12%

Before 1940 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010+

Single-Family Housing By Year Built

6+ bedrooms 5 bedrooms 4 bedrooms 3 bedrooms 2 bedrooms 1 bedrooms 0 bedrooms

US Census Bureau. Integrated Public Use Microdata Sample. 2013-2017 ACS, 5% sample.

11 11 11

Implications:

• Loosing housing

for young families

• Neighborhoods

are evolving within the development limits set by the City

N’hoods are Different