bellevue in 2020
play

Bellevue in 2020 Update on Key Demographic Characteristics Kate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bellevue in 2020 Update on Key Demographic Characteristics Kate Nesse (knesse@bellevuewa.gov) Gwen Rousseau (grousseau@bellevuewa.gov) City of Bellevue, Community Development Bellevue Network on Aging February 6, 2020 1 Agenda 1.


  1. Bellevue in 2020 Update on Key Demographic Characteristics Kate Nesse (knesse@bellevuewa.gov) Gwen Rousseau (grousseau@bellevuewa.gov) City of Bellevue, Community Development Bellevue Network on Aging February 6, 2020 1

  2. Agenda 1. Background 2. Economic Expansion & Hidden Human Capital 3. Income Inequality 4. Changing Residential Character 5. Collecting Accurate Data in the 2020 Census 2

  3. Background Puget Sound Region: 2.75% of national population growth 3

  4. Economic Expansion: Perspective on growth Job Growth Target Jobs grew by 18% 142,000 but population grew 138,000 by only 14% 134,000 130,000 Jobs Planned Jobs 126,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Implications: Housing Growth Target Source: Puget Sound Regional Council. 2019. Special Tabulation of Total Population. & City of Bellevue. 2015. Comprehensive Plan. 65,000 • Longer commutes 63,000 61,000 • Higher housing 59,000 prices 57,000 Houing Units Planned Housing Units 55,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Source: Office of FInancial Management. 2019. April 1 Housing Units, Washington State; Puget Sound Regional Council. 2019. Special Tabulation of Total Population; City of Bellevue. 2015. Comprehensive Plan. 4

  5. Economic Expansion: Many H1-B visa recipients Washington’s Largest 1,296 accepted H1-B Visa Applicants H-1B visa applications from Company (location) 2018 companies Amazon (Seattle) 6,255 headquartered in Microsoft (Redmond) 4,471 Bellevue (2018) T-Mobile (Bellevue) 318 Expedia (Bellevue/Seattle) 287 5

  6. Economic Expansion: Many H1-B visa recipients Implication: Women Not in The Labor Force • Highly capable Post-graduate Education population cannot work due to College Degree immigration issues High School Diploma All Puget Sound Women No High School Diploma Bellevue Non-Citizens Bellevue Citizens 0% 20% 40% 60% Source: Integrated Public Use Microdata Sample. 2018 American Community Survey (1-year estimates), published by University of Minnesota. 6

  7. Income Inequality 28% increase in the Income by Quintile (2018 $) $500,000 Lowest Quintile Second Quintile gap between the $450,000 Third Quintile Fourth Quintile average household Highest Quintile $400,000 income for the $350,000 top 20% and the $300,000 bottom 20% of $250,000 $200,000 households $150,000 (2010-2018) $100,000 $50,000 $0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Source: US Census Bureau. 2010-2018 American Community Surveys (1-year estimates), table B19081 7

  8. Income Inequality Households with Total 45% of households Income Below Full with total income under full time Time Minimum Wage minimum wage Employment Status of ($28,080) support more than 1 person Household Head Employed 30% Unemployed 0.5% Implications: Not in Labor Force 70% • There is substantial financial need in Bellevue 8

  9. Residential Character: Multi-Family Now Studios & 1 Beds Multi-Family Housing By Year Built 34% increase 1% 1% 1% 2% 5+ bedrooms 5% 10% 11% 12% 14% 16% 4 bedrooms in small homes 27% 3 bedrooms 32% 19% 2 bedrooms 38% 1 bedrooms 68% 50% 41% 0 bedrooms 52% 63% 51% 60% 49% 41% 31% 34% 26% 32% 22% 12% 20% 15% 13% 13% 6% 5% 6% 2% Before 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010+ 1940 9 US Census Bureau. Integrated Public Use Microdata Sample. 2013-2017 ACS, 5% sample.

  10. Residential Character: Single-Family Homes Get Bigger Single-Family Housing By Year Built 2% decrease 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 4% 4% 6+ bedrooms 6% 7% 12% 15% 10% 12% 5 bedrooms 14% in family-size 16% 21% 4 bedrooms 23% homes 19% 3 bedrooms 31% 18% 29% 2 bedrooms 27% increase 1 bedrooms 49% 48% 0 bedrooms in very large 41% 52% homes 48% 54% 29% 45% 50% 33% 32% 34% 23% 24% 21% 20% 16% 7% 2% 3% 3% 0% 2% 0% Before 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010+ 1940 10 10 10 US Census Bureau. Integrated Public Use Microdata Sample. 2013-2017 ACS, 5% sample.

  11. N’hoods are Different Implications: • Loosing housing for young families • Neighborhoods are evolving within the development limits set by the City 11 11 11

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend