Auditing the European room Auditing the European room air- - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

auditing the european room auditing the european room air
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Auditing the European room Auditing the European room air- - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Auditing the European room Auditing the European room air- conditioning systems and potential air- conditioning systems and potential energy savings energy savings Daniela Bory Centre for energy and process Mines de Paris - France ECEEE


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Auditing the European room Auditing the European room air- conditioning systems and potential air- conditioning systems and potential energy savings energy savings

Daniela Bory Centre for energy and process Mines de Paris - France ECEEE 2007 Summer Study Colle sur Loup

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Focus on room air conditioning

DIRECTIVE 2002/91/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16th December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings. Article 9 - Inspection of air-conditioning systems With regard to reducing energy consumption and limiting carbon dioxide emissions, Member States shall lay down the necessary measures to establish a regular inspection of air conditioning systems of an effective rated output of more than 12 kW. This inspection shall include an assessment of the air-conditioning efficiency and the sizing compared to the cooling requirements of the building. Appropriate advice shall be provided to the users on possible improvement or replacement of the air-conditioning system and on alternative solutions.

France 19% Germany 8% Italy 31% Spain 21% Portugal 5% UK 10% 1%

The French stock was already important at that time, but its increase has been boost up after the extreme hot climate in 2003 that led to a rapidly market increase: +80% units sold in 2004 ̃400 000 unit sold in 2004 [ClimInfo 2205].

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Com m on defects during operation

The defects identified by Breuker [Breuker1998] for packaged systems can be translated for room air conditioner equipment because of the similar structure of the two systems (air to air systems). The following defects were kept: 1. The refrigerant undercharge 2. The condenser fouling 3. The evaporator filter fouling 4. A restriction in the liquid- line 5. A worn compressor 6./ 7. Indoor and outdoor fans loss of performance

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Chosen system characteristics

Rating Cooling Capacity (kW ) 8.56 Rating Com pressor Power (kW ) 3.15 Rating EER 2.72 Com pressor type Reciprocating Refrigerant R22 Expansion device Therm ostatic expansion valve

Used Model: Oak Ridge Heat Pum p m odel (MARK V) http://www.ornl.gov/̃ wlj/hpdm / Four indoor and outdoor conditions

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Defects energy effects

Refrigerant charge reduction

  • 1 0 %
  • 2 0 %
  • 3 0 %
  • 4 0 %

(EER - EERref )/ EERref % T1 - 3 5 ° C/2 7 ° C

  • 1 .4 %
  • 3 .0 %
  • 6 .2 %
  • 1 2 .3 %

T2 - 2 7 ° C/2 1 ° C

  • 0 .5 %
  • 1 .3 %
  • 3 .4 %
  • 9 .4 %

T2 1 - 3 5 ° C/2 1 ° C

  • 0 .8 %
  • 2 .3 %
  • 4 .2 %
  • 9 .1 %

T1 2 - 2 7 ° C- 2 7 ° C

  • 0 .2 %
  • 2 .3 %
  • 6 .2 %
  • 1 2 .1 %
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Defects energy effects

Condenser fouling (surface Reduction)

  • 1 4 %
  • 2 8 %

(EER- EERref )/ EERref % T1 - 3 5 ° C/2 7 ° C

  • 5 .6 %
  • 1 4 .8 %

T2- 2 7 ° C/2 1 ° C

  • 5 .5 %
  • 1 5 .2 %

T2 1- 3 5 ° C/2 1 ° C

  • 5 .2 %
  • 1 5 .1 %

T1 2- 2 7 ° C

  • 2 7 °

C

  • 5 .4 %
  • 1 5 .1 %

Outdoor fan eff i ciency reduction

  • 1 6 %
  • 2 7 %
  • 4 0 %
  • 4 9 %

(EER

  • EERref )/ EERref %

T1

  • 3 5 °

C/2 7 ° C

  • 1 .5 %
  • 3 .2 %
  • 5 .1 %
  • 7 .2 %

T2- 2 7 ° C/2 1 ° C

  • 1 .5 %
  • 3 .0 %
  • 4 .6 %
  • 6 .5 %

T2 1

  • 3 5 °

C/2 1 ° C

  • 1 .3 %
  • 2 .7 %
  • 4 .3 %
  • 6 .0 %

T1 2

  • 2 7 °

C

  • 2 7 °

C

  • 1 .7 %
  • 3 .5 %
  • 5 .5 %
  • 7 .6 %
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Defects energy effects

Indoor fan eff i ciency reduction

  • 1 8 %
  • 3 3 %
  • 4 7 %
  • 5 8 %

(EER

  • EERref )/ EERref %

T1

  • 3 5 °

C/2 7 ° C

  • 0 .4 %
  • 0 .9 %
  • 1 .4 %
  • 2 .5 %

T2- 2 7 ° C/2 1 ° C

  • 0 .9 %
  • 1 .6 %
  • 2 .4 %
  • 3 .5 %

T2 1

  • 3 5 °

C/2 1 ° C

  • 0 .6 %
  • 1 .2 %
  • 1 .6 %
  • 2 .4 %

T1 2

  • 2 7 °

C

  • 2 7 °

C

  • 0 .6 %
  • 1 .2 %
  • 1 .8 %
  • 2 .3 %

Evaporator Airf l

  • w

reduction

  • 1 2 %
  • 2 4 %
  • 3 6 %
  • 4 8 %

(EER- EERref )/ EERref % T1 -3 5 ° C/2 7 ° C

  • 0 .2 %
  • 1 .0 %
  • 2 .2 %
  • 4 .1 %

T2-2 7 ° C/2 1 ° C

  • 0 .8 %
  • 1 .6 %
  • 3 .6 %
  • 6 .0 %

T2 1-3 5 ° C/2 1 ° C

  • 0 .4 %
  • 0 .7 %
  • 2 .2 %
  • 4 .4 %

T1 2-2 7 ° C-2 7 ° C

  • 0 .4 %
  • 1 .0 %
  • 2 .0 %
  • 4 .6 %
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Defects energy effects

Com pressor Volum etric eff i ciency reduction

  • 9 %
  • 1 7 %
  • 2 5 %
  • 3 4 %

(EER

  • EER ref

)/ EERref % T1 -3 5 ° C/2 7 ° C

  • 6 .1 %
  • 1 2 .6 %
  • 1 9 .1 %
  • 2 6 .4 %

T2-2 7 ° C/2 1 ° C

  • 5 .8 %
  • 1 2 .0 %
  • 1 8 .8 %
  • 2 5 .9 %

T2 1-3 5 ° C/2 1 ° C

  • 6 .5 %
  • 1 2 .9 %
  • 1 9 .9 %
  • 2 7 .6 %

T1 2-2 7 ° C-2 7 ° C

  • 5 .5 %
  • 1 1 .4 %
  • 1 7 .6 %
  • 2 4 .4

%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Defects energy effects

Additional pressure drop (% of total pressure drop at T1 for reference case) 7 % 1 4 % 2 1 % 2 8 % 3 5 % (EER

  • EER ref

)/ EER ref % T1 - 3 5 ° C/2 7 ° C 0 .4 % 0 .5 % 0 .0 %

  • 0 .4 %
  • 1 .2 %

T2- 2 7 ° C/2 1 ° C 0 .2 % 0 .1 %

  • 0 .2 %
  • 1 .1 %
  • 1 .9 %

T2 1- 3 5 ° C/2 1 ° C 1 .0 % 1 .1 % 1 .3 % 1 .4 % 1 .3 % T1 2- 2 7 ° C-2 7 ° C

  • 0 .3 %
  • 1 .1 %
  • 2 .2 %
  • 3 .5 %
  • 5 .1 %
slide-10
SLIDE 10

1 0

Literature com parison

Im pact on system param eters of the reviewed defects

Defects pc pe Pc Pfan Pcompr EER Refrigerant Leaks ↓ (↓) ↓(↓) ↓(↓) ~ ↓ ↓ (↓) Compressor Valve Leaks ↓ (↓) ↑ (↑) ↓(↓) ~ ↓~ ↓(↓) Liquid-Line Restriction ↓ (↓) ↑ (↓) ~↑ (↓) ~ ~↑ ~ Condenser Fouling ↑ (↑) ~ (↑) ↓ (↓) ~ ↑ ↓ (↓) Condenser fan efficiency ↑ ↑ ↓ ↑ ↑ ↓ Evaporator Filter Fouling ↓ (↓) ↓ (↓) ↓ (↓) ~ ↓ ↓ (↓) Evaporator fan efficiency ↓ ↓ ↓ ↑ ↓ ↓~ Breuker, Mark S. and Braun, James E. « Common Faults and Their Impact for Rooftop Air Conditioners », HVAC&R Research, July 1998

slide-11
SLIDE 11

1 1

Dynam ic sim ulations

Office House Total area (m_ ) 1008 136 Cooled area (m_ ) 762 85

Building and clim ates

The dynam ic sim ulation allows to take into account:

  • Operation in non rating

conditions

  • Partial load behavior
  • Building occupation and use

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Load EER EERrated

Partial load eff i ciency in Consoclim

System characteristics

slide-12
SLIDE 12

1 2

Charge effects on the buildings

Office 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 105% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Charge reduction TrappesEa/Ea_ref (%) Nice Ea/Ea_ref (%) Trappes Ec/Ec_ref (%) Nice Ec/Ec_ref (%)

Discomfort hours/operting hours (%)Office

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Charge reduction

Trappes Nice

slide-13
SLIDE 13

1 3

Filter fouling effects on the buildings

Trappes Ea/Ea_ref (%) ) Trappes Ec/Ec_ref (%) Ni ce Ea/Ea_ref (%) Nice Ec/Ec_ref (%)

Office 85% 90% 95% 100%

  • 50%
  • 40%
  • 30%
  • 20%
  • 10%

0% Filter fouling Trappes Nice Discomfort hours/operation hours (%) 0% 5% 10% 15%

  • 50%
  • 40%
  • 30%
  • 20%
  • 10%

0% Filter fouling

slide-14
SLIDE 14

1 4

Com pressor wearing effects on the buildings

Trappes Ec/Ec_ref (%) Trappes Ea/Ea_ref (%) Nice Ec/Ec_ref (%) Nice Ea/Ea_ref (%)

Office 67% 77% 87% 97% 0% 10% 20% 30% Volumetric efficiency reduction

Office Discomfort hours/operation hours (%) 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 0% 10% 20% 30% Volumetric efficiency reduction Nice Trappes

slide-15
SLIDE 15

1 5

Condenser fouling effects on the building s

Trappes Ea/Ea_ref (%) Trappes Ec/Ec_ref (%) Nice Ea/Ea_ref (%) Nice Ec/Ec_ref (%)

Office

95% 100% 105% 110% 115% 120% 125% 0% 10% 20% 30% Surface reduction

House

95% 100% 105% 110% 115% 120% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Surface Reduction

slide-16
SLIDE 16

1 6

Condenser fan wearing effects on the buildings

100% 101% 102% 103% 104% 105% 106% 107% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Fan efficiency reduction (%) Ea/Earef% Office-Trappes Office-Nice House-Trappes House-Nice

slide-17
SLIDE 17

1 7

Conclusions

  • Determ ine the defect that m ainly worsen the AC room air

conditioners eff i ciency:

  • defects that can be m ainly source of over consum ption

as condenser fouling and outdoor fans loss of perform ance

  • defects that have m ain effects on the cooling capacity

and com fort aspect (while the annual consum ption can be found reduced) as f i lter fouling, com pressor leaks, refrigerant leaks.

  • The inspection procedure should focus on both these

aspects

  • Energ y and com fort assessm ent would be necessary on

the base of the inspector/auditor observations to prom ote the better m aintenance

slide-18
SLIDE 18

1 8

Conclusions

  • W e would recom m end
  • Refrig erant leaks check should be a priority for the

auditor (especially for old system s)

  • The condenser should inspected with care because

it has an im portant im pact at the consum ption level

  • Com pressor problem s are m ore diff i

cult to detect

  • The status of the f i

lter can be visually checked or estim ated by asking to the owner the sum m ary of m aintenance operations

  • More efforts should be done in order to extend this

analysis to system s using different technolog ies or refrig erant f l uids

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Auditing the European room Auditing the European room air- conditioning systems and potential air- conditioning systems and potential energy savings energy savings

Daniela Bory - Centre for energy and process - Mines de Paris, France ECEEE 2007 Summer Study Colle sur Loup