au Fonds de Rsolution Unique Autorit de Contrle Prudentiel et de - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

au fonds de r solution unique
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

au Fonds de Rsolution Unique Autorit de Contrle Prudentiel et de - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Collecte des donnes et contributions au Fonds de Rsolution Unique Autorit de Contrle Prudentiel et de Rsolution Direction de la Rsolution Novembre 2015 RESTREINT Sommaire 1. Calendrier du transfert des contributions 2015 2.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

RESTREINT

Collecte des données et contributions au Fonds de Résolution Unique

Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution Direction de la Résolution Novembre 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

RESTREINT

Sommaire

2

1. Calendrier du transfert des contributions 2015 2. Calendrier de la collecte des données de calcul des contributions de 2016 3. Reporting des données 2016 4. Calcul des contributions 2016 5. IPC 2015 2016 6. FAQ et Helpdesk

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 1. Transfers of 2015 contributions

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 1. 2015 Transfer processes

Timeline

2015 2016

Oct Nov Dec 16 Oct Send template (T1) - NRA’s Official Contact information 28 Oct Complete template (T1)

  • NRA’s Official Contact

information 31 Dec Complete template (T2) - Payment Amounts : Logic, Methodology and Rules applied for calculation 31 Jan Complete money transfer to SRB + complete template (T4) - IPCs Tracker + IPC & Collateral contracts 16 Nov General communication and sending templates (T2, T3 & T4)

NRAs SRB

SRB action NRAs action All dates are deadlines or due dates Feb Jan Send debit notes Jan Complete template (T3) - Payment Amounts Tracker Jan

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 2. 2016 Data collection

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 2. 2016 Data collection process

Timeline

SRB action NRAs action Optional action Mandatory action All dates are deadlines or due dates

2015 2016

Nov Dec Jan Feb

15 Nov -30 Nov Test Phase By 3 Feb Sent the initial data as on 1/02 24:00 15 Nov - 30 Nov Test Phase & Clarifications requests on scope

  • f institutions

NRAs SRB

15 March 12:00 Deadline for the NRAs to sent the final version of the data 25 Feb Sent the interim data as on 23/02 24:00

Mar

1 Feb 24:00 Deadline for institutions to provide data 15 February Deadline for the NRAs to sent the EBA aggregate intrabank loans and deposits

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Checks Principles

7

  • According to the DR, the data provided by 1/02/2016 (Monday) should be

used for calculation of 2016 individual contributions

  • In case of missing data the SRB/NRA has an obligation to "use estimates
  • r its own assumptions " – Art. 17 (1); in case of risk indicators the

NRA/SRB "may assign the institution concerned to the highest risk adjusting multiplier "

  • Art. 17(2)
  • In case of restatements or revisions provided after 1/02/2016, the

resolution authority shall adjust the annual contribution for the following contribution period.

  • Delegated Regulation does not stipulate any particular rules or timeframe

for checks

  • There is a general "good administrative behaviour principle" that in case
  • f "obvious clerical mistakes" an institution should have a possibility of

correction

  • In order to ensure level playing field such corrections must respect strict

rules

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Checks

Rules applicable to correction of "Obvious clerical mistakes"

8

1. The NRA should take the initiative of contacting the institution in writing exclusively. 2. In no case the NRA can correct them on behalf of the institution without its prior written consent. 3. Requests sent to an institution must be very precise: they must be purely factual (e.g. request specific missing data by referring to the data request, request confirmation about the correction of a clerical error in wording or calculation). 4. The principle of equal treatment demands that if one Institution is asked to correct

  • bvious clerical errors, the same must apply to all institutions in the same situation

5. Institutions should not be given an opportunity to provide extra information that may restate or revise the data. 6. The time limit for response must not exceed in principle 2 working days, since all data were supposed to be provided earlier in the initial tender and the correction of errors requires only confirmation of an obvious mistake. 7. The request should remind the Institution that the data submitted may not be revised or restated. 8. Each NRA will have to send to the SRB the -initial, -interim and -final versions of data

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CHECKS CASE 1 – MISSING DATA necessary for calculation spotted during checks

Is this an "Obvious clerical mistake"? (*) NRA contacts the Institution and requests to send correct data within

  • max. 48 hours

Provided within the timeframe? Y N For 2016 Y N BAC Risk Indicator Lump Sum NRA proposes to the SRB estimated value For 2016 NRA proposes the SRB the estimated the value or assigns to Max Risk

1/02 15/03 (*)

(*) subject to decision on the delivery of aggregate value of Interbank Loans and Deposits to the EBA

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

CHECKS – Case 2 – DATA PROVIDED (incl. zero figure) BUT potential error spotted during checks Is this an "Obvious clerical mistake"? (*) NRA contacts immediately the Institution and requests to send new value within max. 48 hours Provided within the timeframe? Y N New Value for 2016 Y N Old value for 2016 NRA informs the Institution of the possibility of revision of restatement until 31/01/2017 Provided within the timeframe? New value for 2017 Y N NO action

1/02 15/03 (*)

(*) subject to decision on the delivery of aggregate value of Interbank Loans and Deposits to the EBA

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CHECKS – Case 3 – DATA REVISED/RESTATED by institution after 1/02/2015

In that case, the revised or restated data are recorded and will be used for adjustment of 2017 contribution 1/02/2015 31/01/2017

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Audit certificates/agreed upon procedure

12

  • The SRB does not have a legal right to impose audit

certificates nor agreed upon procedure arrangements which bear costs for institutions

  • Each NRA may decide to apply additional

certificates/arrangements during the data collection process

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • 3. 2016 Data reporting

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Information flow between the SRB and the ECB

14

According to the Art. 19(3) of Delegated Regulation 2015/63, the competent authorities shall provide the resolution authorities any information enabling the resolution authorities to calculate the annual contributions

  • ECB holds and maintains a list of :

 all the credit institutions (at legal entity level)  EU consolidation groups (within SSM perimeter)  all the IPS (collected during a one-off special data collection in Sep2015)

  • The SSM does not have information on investment firms.
  • There are differences between the scope of data required by the SRB and the scope of

supervisory reporting data available in the SSM

  • Information available at the SSM about credit institutions is also available for central

bodies

  • ECB/SSM informing the SRB about the setup of a central coordination hub at the Crisis

Management Division

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Covered deposits as defined in DGSD at the reference date (31

December 2014) and on 31 December 2015 should be provided by institutions at individual level

  • The DGS Directive - (EU) 2014/49- was not transposed in all the

Member States yet.

  • The DGSD continues to be transposed, so in 2015 more MSs will be

able to report Covered Deposits

  • Frequency, the regulation 2015/63 requires a yearly average of

quarterly amounts, however since the last quarter of 2015 could not yet be available, we could work with the average of the current data available

Total Liabilities Own funds Covered Deposits

  • Covered deposits (Art 4(2),16, 20(4) of the DR 2015/63)

Covered deposits

Basic Annual Contribution Annual Target

Frequency

Jul'15 Sep'15 Dec'15

Average 2015

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • 4. 2016 Calculation of contributions

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Calculation of contributions

Data from credit institutions and investment firms (SRB templates or alternatives) Aggregation at country-level by NRAs Aggregation of 19 NRAs input in 1 SRB file Calculation of contributions

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Calculation of contributions

43

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • 5. 2015 and 2016 IPCs

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Indicative timetable

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Contemplated process for the delivery of collateral

SRB decides on IPC (%, collateral) NRAs notifie institutions (annual amount of the contribution, max % for IPCs) Institutions inform NRAs about their decisions on IPCs NRAs issue a final notification to institutions Institutions transfer the cash to a bank account

  • pened in the name of

the SRB Matching between the amount of collateral collected and the amount expected by the NCB that holds SRB account

Dunning process performed by NRAs The SRB decides to invest or not to invest the cash received as collateral

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Contemplated process for the payment of interest

22

Negative interest rate Positive interest rate

slide-23
SLIDE 23

How to invest the cash received:

23

Term deposits in period of positive interest rates Term deposits in period of negative interest rates

slide-24
SLIDE 24

General considerations

24

  • Only cash is accepted as collateral for 2015
  • Cash collected by NRAs will be transferred to SRB in January 2016,

under a contract between the SRB and the NRAs concerned.

  • The SRB is still to decide whether it will allow or not securities as

collateral in the coming years

  • It may be challenging for the very first years.
  • In any case, we need to know the prerequisites
  • To be ready on time.
  • 18 months may be needed depending on the approach chosen.
slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • 6. FAQ and Helpdesk (incl. promotional loans)

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

FAQ and Helpdesk

26

Key principles for the FAQ:

 NRAs are the first point of contact for the institutions;  NRAs will verify if the question can be answered by referring to the existing FAQs prepared by the SRB. In case the FAQ is not sufficient, they will escalate to the SRB;  NRAs should have the same level of information. Therefore, the SRB will centrally consolidate all FAQs in order to ensure consistency of answers. It is imperative that the European Commission and the European Banking Authority are involved in this process to ensure compliance with the regulations and harmonised implementation throughout the European Union

 Please note that the SRB Helpdesk process is under review with all the

stakeholders