atlas pixel detector upgrade
play

ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade The Insertable B-Layer David Bertsche - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade The Insertable B-Layer David Bertsche November 8th, 2012 ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL) Introduction Motivation


  1. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade The Insertable B-Layer David Bertsche November 8th, 2012 ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  2. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning Introduction ◮ Experimental High Energy Physics (HEP) is done using particle accelerators and detectors. ◮ The OU HEP group is part of the ATLAS detector collaboration. ◮ The innermost section suffers heavy radiation damage - thus the upgrade. ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  3. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning Top Physics Higgs Studies Motivation: b Physics Figure: http://CPEPweb.org ◮ Free quarks hadronize into a collimated spray of particles called a jet. ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  4. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning Top Physics Higgs Studies Top Physics Figure: t → Wb and subsequent decays ◮ Free top quarks have a lifetime of ∼ 10 − 25 s, not enough time to hadronize ( ∼ 10 − 23 s). ◮ The SM t → Wb branching fraction is ∼ 100%. ◮ b tagging efficiency will remove a large amount of background for top physics (such as W + n jets and QCD). ◮ Observing a different branching fraction could lead to physics beyond the SM. ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  5. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning Top Physics Higgs Studies Higgs Studies Figure: Theoretial Standard Model Higgs Boson branching Figure: Experimental Higgs Boson branching ratios, including theoretical uncertainties. ratios. ◮ If the SM Higgs mass is indeed ∼ 125 GeV, H → b ¯ b is the dominant decay mode ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  6. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning LHC Inner Detector Tracking b Tagging Design LHC Accelerator p - p Design Parameters: ◮ Max Energy = 14TeV ◮ 1.15 × 10 11 particles per bunch ◮ 25 ns between bunch crossings ◮ 19 collisions per crossing (avg) ◮ Luminosity = 10 34 cm − 2 s − 1 These parameters are unprecedented, requiring faster radiation-hard electronics. ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  7. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning LHC Inner Detector Tracking b Tagging Design The ATLAS Detector ◮ ATLAS > Inner Detector > Pixel Detector ◮ 4 π solid angle coverage ◮ z points along beam, x to LHC ring center and y vertically ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  8. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning LHC Inner Detector Tracking b Tagging Design The ATLAS Inner Detector ◮ Functions are tracking and vertexing ◮ The Insertable B-Layer (IBL) will be the innermost layer of the detector. ◮ The IBL specializes in identifying interaction vertices. ◮ 2 T solenoidal magnetic field curves charged particle trajectory. ◮ Pixel Detector ◮ Silicon Microstrip Tracker (SCT) ◮ Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT) Figure: Cut-away view of the Inner Detector. ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  9. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning LHC Inner Detector Tracking b Tagging Design Radiation Passage Through Matter ◮ Particles are detected by the energy they deposit in the detector. ◮ Multiple scattering and energy loss should be minimized in the Inner Detector. ◮ Charged heavy particles primarily experience elastic collisions with electrons as described by the Bethe-Bloch formula: � 2 m e γ 2 v 2 W max e m e c 2 ρ Zz 2 dE � � − 2 β 2 − δ − 2 C � ∝ 1 dx = 2 π N o r 2 β 2 ln (const · β 2 γ 2 ) ln A β 2 I 2 Z Figure: A charged pion traveling through silicon. (The dotted line shows density and shell correction terms.) ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  10. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning LHC Inner Detector Tracking b Tagging Design Tracking ◮ The momentum and charge of a particle are determined from the track curvature. Figure: Multiple scattering worsens the momentum resolution. Figure: First stable beam collision in with the ID fully powered. ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  11. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning LHC Inner Detector Tracking b Tagging Design Vertexing and Impact Parameter Measurement Figure: The Impact Parameter (IP) is determined from the distance of closest approach to the primary vertex. Figure: Vertices and Jets ◮ IBL improves primary vertex reconstruction resolution from 15 µ m to 11 µ m (in x - y ) and from 34 µ m to 24 µ m (in z ). ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  12. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning LHC Inner Detector Tracking b Tagging Design b Tagging Figure: The Impact Parameter sign is determined from the relative geometry of the Figure: Relative transverse momentum can be primary and secondary vertices. used to differentiate between b and c jets. ◮ Up, down and strange quarks create light jets which cannot usually be distinguished from each other. ◮ Jets from charm quarks are sometimes grouped with light jets and sometimes uniquely identified. ◮ b hadrons (lifetime ∼ 10 − 12 s) can travel a few mm. b jets have a secondary vertex with a large positive IP. ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  13. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning LHC Inner Detector Tracking b Tagging Design b Tagging Figure: Jet tagging weight distribution. Figure: Tagging efficiency must be balanced against light jet rejection. ◮ Computer algorithms are used to b tag, their parameters are adjusted with the goal of maximizing efficiency while minimizing the number of jets erroneously b tagged. ◮ Typical efficiencies are 60%-70% with a mistag rate of ∼ 1%. ◮ Algorithms are tested and optimized using Monte Carlo simulations of detector events. Efficiency = # of jets that were b tagged actual # of b jets ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  14. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning LHC Inner Detector Tracking b Tagging Design IBL Design Requirements Primary motivation : Alleviate radiation damage and to provide improved measurement accuracy. Long term motivation : Prepare for the High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC), planned in 2020. ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  15. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning LHC Inner Detector Tracking b Tagging Design IBL Design Requirements Primary motivation : Alleviate radiation damage and to provide improved measurement accuracy. Long term motivation : Prepare for the High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC), planned in 2020. Luminosity Requirements : With increased luminosity comes increased pileup and occupancy ◮ Both are decreased by faster readout speed, smaller pixel size, and improved vertexing and track reconstruction. ◮ IBL Increases B -layer lifetime integrated luminosity from 300 fb − 1 to 550 fb − 1 . ◮ IBL Increases ID peak design luminosity from 1 × 10 34 cm − 2 s − 1 to 3 × 10 34 cm − 2 s − 1 . ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  16. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning LHC Inner Detector Tracking b Tagging Design IBL Design Requirements Primary motivation : Alleviate radiation damage and to provide improved measurement accuracy. Long term motivation : Prepare for the High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC), planned in 2020. Luminosity Requirements : With increased luminosity comes increased pileup and occupancy ◮ Both are decreased by faster readout speed, smaller pixel size, and improved vertexing and track reconstruction. ◮ IBL Increases B -layer lifetime integrated luminosity from 300 fb − 1 to 550 fb − 1 . ◮ IBL Increases ID peak design luminosity from 1 × 10 34 cm − 2 s − 1 to 3 × 10 34 cm − 2 s − 1 . Novel engineering solutions developed : ◮ Tight tolerances and clearances - no module overlap in z and sensors with thin edges. ◮ Minimizing materials - thin sensor design, low density carbon foam staves, CO 2 evaporative cooling and aluminum electrical conduits. ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  17. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning Detector Layout Support Manufacturing Installation Solid State Detectors ◮ The p-n junction diode is the building block of solid state detectors. ◮ The depleted junction region is useful. ◮ It is expanded by applying a reverse bias voltage. ◮ Ionizing radiation excites electrons from the valence band into the conduction band, leaving a hole behind. ◮ Collected electrons are processed into a signal. ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

  18. Introduction Motivation Requirements Engineering Commissioning Detector Layout Support Manufacturing Installation Pixel Detector Module Figure: Sensor bump bonded to readout electronics. Figure: One cell. ◮ The sensor bulk is divided into many pixels. ◮ Electrons transferred to the electronics chip through a conducting bump bond. ◮ Proximity of sensor and FE chip allows for high readout speeds. ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade: The Insertable B-Layer (IBL)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend