Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative 2014
Aqueduct Legacies | Aqueduct Futures
Barry Lehrman
Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture Cal Poly Pomona
Aqueduct Legacies | Aqueduct Futures Barry Lehrman Assistant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative 2014 Aqueduct Legacies | Aqueduct Futures Barry Lehrman Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture Cal Poly Pomona 100 years of change since Mulholland said There it is - take it! A century of
Barry Lehrman
Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture Cal Poly Pomona
2
100 years of change since Mulholland said ‘There it is - take it!’
global city
water transfers and protect ecological water needs
now used in the Owens Valley for dust mitigation and enhanced mitigation projects
reducing the demand for imported water Still
legal liabilities related to the continued operations of the Los Angeles Aqueduct
3
4
5
6
Min - Max total in CA % of CA Wind 0 - 1.06 Gal/MWH 13 GWH 6.3% Solar PV 0 - 3.96 Gal/MWH 1 GWH 0.90% Concentrated Solar Power 766 - 1004 Gal/MWH 675 GWH NGCC 129 - 502 Gal/MWH 13,100 GWH 43% IGCC (Coal) 173 - 1,830 Gal/MWH 22,700 GWH 7.5% Conventional Coal 520 - 1,041 Gal/MWH Nuclear 581 - 898 Gal/MWH 27,300 GWH 9.0% Geothermal 1400 - 1,796 Gal/MWH 13,400 GWH 4.4% Biomass 7,100 GWH 2.3% Hydro n/a 43,600 GWH 9.8%
The Water-Energy Nexus
Source: www.westernresourceadvocates.org/water/images/ energyintensity.gif
7
8
2005 LORP 2001 Owens Lake Dust Project 1970 2nd LA Aqueduct 1923 Owens Valley pumping 1941 Mono Crater Tunnel
9
10
11
Benefjts for the Owens Valley
Legacy of LADWP ownership:
Alternate histories:
rest of the Central Valley - a sprawl of industrial agriculture and housing subdivisions
Source: Robert A. Sauder, Patenting an Arid Frontier: Use and Abuse of the Public Land Laws in Owens Valley, California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 79, No. 4 (Dec., 1989), pp.544-569. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2563647
12
Impacts to Owens Valley
for the LADWP or Sparkletts
limit water use, not to maximize rents or their return on investment leading to blight
locally grown food available to the community
vegetation across the Valley
causes public health issues
13
14
Status Quo H20
LADWP continues existing water & property practices = $ BILLIONS OF LIABILITY & POLITICAL COSTS Establishing a conservation easement
Transfer non-essential LADWP land to another agency = REDUCED ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES Increased mitigation, without property management reforms = CONTINUED POLITICAL COSTS Ecological restoration & economic growth =
Status Quo Divestment Reduced H2O Exports Aqueduct Futures Scenarios: Owens Valley
15
W h i t n e y MBig Picture: Opportunities for the Owens Valley
Overhauling LADWP property management policies:
Reforming LADWP’s open space policies or transferring management to another agency could:
If 100% of Owens River water can remain in the Valley:
signifjcant plant communities (5-50 years)
16
Big Picture: Multi-Functional Infrastructure
Doing more with less:
‘living aqueducts‘
nurseries, storage/parking
17
Big Picture: Towards Resilience and Adaptation
Global population growth and global warming:
sources
recycled H20 & increased capture of rainwater - decreases need for imported water and large-scale storage
California’s water rights system
18
Next Steps towards Peace
‘Colorado River Aqueduct Master Plan’) that focuses on multi-functional uses for the land and region
Special Resources Study of the Owens Valley
data on data.lacity.org, and assist Inyo County’s Assessor mapping the LADWP’s real estate holdings
recycling of water by limiting contaminants in consumer goods that are hard to remove
Thank You! blehrman@csupomona.edu www.aqueductfutures.com