d-cyphaTrade Australian Energy Markets Commission Reallocation/ - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

d cyphatrade australian energy markets commission
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

d-cyphaTrade Australian Energy Markets Commission Reallocation/ - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

d-cyphaTrade Australian Energy Markets Commission Reallocation/ Futures MCL offsets December 2006 Agenda 1. Importance of Futures 2. SCOPE Direct Futures MCL Offsets Why AEMC should consider Futures Offsets in current workflow 3. NEM


slide-1
SLIDE 1

d-cyphaTrade Australian Energy Markets Commission Reallocation/ Futures MCL offsets

December 2006

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

Agenda

  • 1. Importance of Futures
  • 2. SCOPE – Direct Futures MCL Offsets

Why AEMC should consider Futures Offsets

in current workflow

  • 3. NEM Objective

New entrant retailer perspective

  • 4. Summary of efficiency improvements
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

Importance of Futures

12.3 million MWh during November-06 ~ 78% of NEM demand (ex Tas)

MWh traded by Month

  • 2,000,000

4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000

Sep-02 Nov-02 Jan-03 Mar-03 May-03 Jul-03 Sep-03 Nov-03 Jan-04 Mar-04 May-04 Jul-04 Sep-04 Nov-04 Jan-05 Mar-05 May-05 Jul-05 Sep-05 Nov-05 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Futures Options & Caps

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

Importance of Futures

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

SCOPE – Futures MCL offsets

Futures based MCL offsets are relevant to reallocations workstream because:

  • 1. Futures Offsets and NEMMCO

reallocations are complimentary and apply similar MCL offset formulas

  • 2. AEMC asked d-cyphaTrade (20

participant) submission to be a response to NEMMCO proposal

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

SCOPE – Futures MCL offsets

  • 3. Efficiency objectives cited by NEMMCO

proposal and Draft Rule can only be achieved if complimented with efficiency and popularity of Futures

  • 4. AEMC determination cites desire to

incorporate futures-based offsets but:

  • 1. ignored ASX submission; and
  • 2. did not consult with SFE Clearers…

.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

SCOPE – Futures MCL offsets

5 .

SFE Clearers w ill not participate as “Reallocators”

NEMMCO proposal asks SFE Clearers (as

Reallocators) to bear unacceptable risk

Unacceptable risk created by shortcomings

and “non-firmness” in NEMMCO reallocation derivative market

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

SCOPE – Futures MCL offsets

6.

NEMMCO has been unable or unwilling to deliver Futures based reallocations, despite written industry requests dating back to Feb 2 0 0 5

Written requests from AFMA,

ERAA, 1 0 industry participants

Meetings between NEMMCO and

d-cyphaTrade/ SFE since Sep 2 0 0 4

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

SCOPE – Futures MCL offsets

  • 7. Hence, “NEMMCO consultation with

Industry Participants” w ill not deliver workable futures reallocations

  • 8. Moving reallocation rules to procedures

enables NEMMCO to exclude futures from reallocations indefinitely

hence Draft Rule will not achieve cited objectives unless AEMC also incorporates Futures Offsets

slide-10
SLIDE 10

1 0 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

NEM Objective – new entrant perspective

> Credit risk creates barrier to entry to New

Entrant Retailers and energy consumers

> See names of J20 submitters

> MCL guarantee costs much higher than

NEMMCO quoted – project financing costs for new entrants (e.g. 15% effective cost)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

1 1 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

NEM Objective – new entrant perspective

> Working capital constraints limit the growth

  • f New Entrant retailers – unless Futures

Offsets implemented

> Reallocations merely transfer credit risk to

New Entrant retailers and gens – increasing reallocation costs

> Direct Futures MCL offsets reduce credit

risks (and inefficiency of OTC) via SFE Clearing Participants, Clearing House, Contract Netting and daily margining

slide-12
SLIDE 12

1 2 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

NEM Objective – new entrant perspective

> Base Load Generators retain absolute

market power – unless Futures Offsets incorporated

> New entrant retailers forced to buy

reallocations from incumbent base load generators

> New entrant retailers cannot buy from

interstate gens or non-bank financial traders

slide-13
SLIDE 13

1 3 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

NEM Objective – new entrant perspective

> Base Load Generators retain absolute

market power – unless Futures Offsets incorporated

> Non-bank, non NEM Participant trading > 28% NEM

demand and excluded from supplying MCL Offsets as “Reallocators”

> Vertically Integrated entities (Base Load) are

preferentially treated by NEMMCO reallocations

  • i.e. No consolidated loss upon default of related

entity

> New Entrant and independent retailers must bear and

pay for credit risk created by reallocation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

1 4 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

NEM Objective – new entrant perspective

  • Lack of popularity of NEMMCO reallocations

limits potential efficiency gains – energy constrained market and lack of competition

SFE “Exchange for Physical” = Unlimited supply of MCL Offsets for New Entrants

1. EFP enables Retailers to create unlimited futures positions to achieve MCL cost reductions 2. EFP Market Size is independent of retailer hedges - the entire NEM dem and load could be EFP’d

slide-15
SLIDE 15

1 5 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

Exchange for Physical (EFP) example

Retailer’s Clearing Participant Seller’s Clearing Participant

Banks, generators, other retailers, non- bank futures sellers Retailer

EFP Transaction

Retailer wishes to enter into EFP, to create a bought futures position to create an MCL Futures Offset. *Retailer buys spot futures, sells swap. On matching, the SFE Clearing Participant of each party registers the EFP. Sell Swap Buy Futures Buy Swap Sell Futures

slide-16
SLIDE 16

1 6 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

Direct Futures – Reductions in MCL credit costs for New Entrants

New Entrant Retailer reduction in MCL guarantees from Direct Futures MCL Offsets – historical observations only

R egion

Q tr 2 2005 Q tr 3 2005 Q tr 4 2005 Q tr 1 2006 Q tr 2 2006 Q tr 3 2006 Q tr 4 2006 SA

50% 47% 43% 14% 69% 60% 55%

Q L D

54% 45% 30% 0% 59% 49% 41%

V IC

35% 30% 32% 0% 57% 56% 53%

N SW

68% 66% 65% 57% 69% 57% 54%

slide-17
SLIDE 17

1 7 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

Summary of Efficiency (see JS20 submission for more efficiencies)

Negligible Strong

Clearing Bank support

Excluded (practically) Included

Peaking generation participation

Same Region base load gens

  • nly

Banks, funds, non-bank

traders, inter-state gens, retailers Competition for supply of offsets

Nil Full

Inter-state trading

Nil Total

Market Transparency

NEMMCO reallocations w ithout Direct Futures Direct Futures MCL Offsets Efficiency I m provem ents ( NEM Objective)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

1 8 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

Need gen’s permission

Retailer’s unilateral

decision Flexibility of Entry and Reversal of offset

No

Yes

Anonymity

Ineffective

Effective

Avoidance of systemic default risk from generator outage

Weak

Strong

Reduction of credit default risk (and costs)

Substantial

None

Preferential treatment for Vertical Integration

NEMMCO reallocations w ithout Futures Direct Futures MCL Offsets Efficiency I m provem ents ( NEM Objective)

Summary of Efficiency (see JS20 submission for more efficiencies)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

1 9 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

Request to AEMC

> AEMC asked to advise if 20 industry

participants should immediately submit an additional Rule Change Request

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2 0 w w w .d-cyphaTrade.com .au 1 8 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1

Disclaim er

This material is intended to provide general information only. The information is subject to change. It does not constitute financial product advice and readers should seek their own professional advice in assessing the effect of the information on their circumstances. d-cyphaTrade (d-cypha Limited) accepts no liability for errors or omissions, including negligence, or for any damage loss or claim arising from reliance on the information. d-cyphaTrade has no involvement in, and takes no responsibility for, the conduct or operation of the financial market operated by Sydney Futures Exchange Limited (SFE), on which the Australian Electricity Futures Contracts (Contracts) are

  • listed. The SFE is solely responsible for the conduct and operation of that financial market. d-

cyphaTrade is not a related entity of the SFE. d-cyphaTrade receives commercial benefit from Contract turnover. Futures and options trading involves the potential for both profits and losses and only licensed persons can advise on this risk. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decisions. d-cypha Limited, ABN 46 100 426 542, is a New Zealand company registered in New Zealand under the name Energy Market Services Limited. Australian Financial Services Licence No: 305331.