April 5, 2013 OK Address Standards Workgroup OK Address Standards - - PDF document

april 5 2013 ok address standards workgroup ok address
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

April 5, 2013 OK Address Standards Workgroup OK Address Standards - - PDF document

April 5, 2013 OK Address Standards Workgroup OK Address Standards Workgroup Mike Sharp Office of Geographic Information Shellie Willoughby - Office of Geographic Information Troy Frazier Oklahoma Tax Commission Kathy Hines


slide-1
SLIDE 1

April 5, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mike Sharp – Office of Geographic Information Shellie Willoughby - Office of Geographic Information Troy Frazier –Oklahoma Tax Commission Kathy Hines – OU Center for Spatial Analysis Brenda Fennel – Choctaw Nation J

  • el Foster –Association of Central Oklahoma Governments (ACOG)

Sohail Hasanjee - ONEOK Craig Moody – Oklahoma Department of Transportation Wade Patterson – Garfield County Assessor Charles Brady III – City of Ardmore

OK Address Standards Workgroup OK Address Standards Workgroup

Many others have reviewed & commented during the process so far.

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • No accepted published standard in the state
  • Diverse development
  • Data compatibility issues
  • Limited usability
  • Redundant expenses
  • Difficulty in displaying datasets across jurisdictions
  • Interpretations of terms doesn't translate well

between users.

  • Data security / availability

Existing Issues Existing Issues

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Published Standards Published Standards

1999 2005 FGDC National Standard - 2010 2006 2002

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Current Status Current Status

Multiple datasets exist with quality data The data currently works for the agencies that

developed it.

An established cohesive willing GIS community

exists in Oklahoma

A growing need of a statewide GIS address standard

from other agencies that utilize GIS

Previously stated need from GIS community

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Goals Goals

  • Determine critical components of point &

centerline datasets to provide addressing capabilities

  • Define values for pull down menus, cite

sources, determine stewards.

  • Comply with existing standards (FGDC, Postal,

NENA)

  • Publish an address standard

– Provide an address standard to non GIS users – Provide a data schema to the GIS community – Keep this as a living document

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Implementation Implementation

The adoption and use of this standard is

  • voluntary. However, publication of geospatial

data by “State agencies, boards, commissions and public trusts having the State of Oklahoma as a beneficiary” pursuant to Title 62, Section 34.11.5 of the Oklahoma Statutes may have to comply with this standard.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

City County E911 COG State Agencies NENA/ OKLANENA, URISA, FGDC,USPS

Data Sources & Authorities Data Sources & Authorities

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Discussion & Data Issues Discussion & Data Issues

slide-10
SLIDE 10

NENA – National Emergency Number Association URISA - Urban and Regional Information Systems

Association

FGDC - Federal Geographic Data Committee ANI/ ALI - Automatic Number Identification / Automatic

Location Identification

MSAG – Master Street Address Guide PSAP – Public Service Access Point ESN – Emergency Service Network Next Gen 911- 911 with video, text, images Phase I & II 911- Wireless calls information & location

data

VoIP – Voice Over Internet Protocol

Acronyms Acronyms