An Overview of Ethical Issues in Estate Planning Bill Ambrunn, Esq. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An Overview of Ethical Issues in Estate Planning

Bill Ambrunn, Esq.

Law Offices of Bill Ambrunn 1906 Market Street, #938 San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 724-0498 ambrunnlaw@yahoo.com

1

Course Outline

1. Introduction 2. Roles and Duties of Attorney 3. Establishing Attorney/Client Relationship – Who is the Client and When? 4. Client Confidentiality 5. Representing Multiple Parties 6. Conflicts of Interest 7. Written Informed Consent 8. Duties to Client 9. Scope of Representation and Fees

• 10. Mental Capacity
• 11. Elder Abuse and Undue Influence
• 12. Other Attorney Duties
• 13. Questions/Answers

2

Attorney Resources

• Complete Plans for Small and Mid-

Size Estates (Cal CEB)

• California Powers of Attorney &

Health Care Directives (Cal CEB)

3

Consequences of Violating Rules or Standard of Care

• State Bar discipline
• Invalidation of client’s estate plans
• Civil liability for malpractice
• duty of care owed to client/testator as well as

beneficiaries and intended beneficiaries; see Schick v. Bach (1987) 193 CA3d 1321, 1330

• damages can include lost testamentary gifts, loss of

trust principal for probate expenses, etc.; for recent case dealing with these issues, see Moore v. Anderson Zeigler Disharoon Gallagher & Gray (2003) 109 CA4th 946

• Attorney can even owe duty to disqualified beneficiary

(Probate Code Section 21350 et seq.); Osornio v. Weingarten (2004) 124 CA4th 304

4

Role of Attorney

• Attorney is more than a scrivener
• Representation can include advice,

guidance in areas such as intestacy, testamentary gifts, probate procedures and costs, family law and community property, tax law, agency and other areas

• Rules can be found in California Rules of

Professional Conduct, as well as Business & Professions, Evidence, Probate, Penal and Welfare & Institutions Codes

5

Establishing Attorney/Client Relationship – Who is the Client and When?

• Who is contacting you and why?
• What is the scope of the

representation sought and/or needed?

• If joint representation sought, is

there a potential or actual conflict

• f interest?

6

Attorney’s Duties to Client

• Duty of loyalty
• Duty to maintain client confidences (Bus. and Prof.

Code Section 6068(e))

• Duty to avoid actual and potential conflicts of interest

(Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 3-310)

• Duty to perform services competently and diligently

including duty to consult with experts (Cal. Rules of

• Prof. Conduct 3-110); and not charge unconscionable

fees (Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 4-200(A))

• Duty to communicate with client (Cal. Rules of Prof.

Conduct 3-500)

• Duty to not allow third party paying for legal fees to

interfere with lawyer’s independent judgment (Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 1-600(A))

7

Creation of Attorney-Client Relationship

• Attorney-Client relationship is created by contract

(express or implied) and governed by the general rules of agency; conduct of both parties must indicate offer and acceptance; see Witkin, California Procedure, Attorneys Sections 68 – 69 (4th ed. 1996)

• Arises without formality, fee payment or fee

agreement between parties. See Miller v. Metzinger (1979) 91 CA3d 31, 39

• Does not exist merely because party believes that

an attorney is representing his or her interests. See Fox v. Polack (1986) 181 CA3d 954,959

8

Client Confidentiality

• Purpose of rules is to encourage complete

candor between attorney and client, to ensure every aspect of relationship will further the client’s interests

• Non-verbal communications are included
• Broader than definition of “attorney-client

privilege” in Evidence Code Section 952

• If the information would be embarrassing or

detrimental to the client if divulged to a third party, it is a protected communication (California State Bar Formal Opinion No. 89- 112)

9

• Attorney represents multiple clients either jointly
• r separately
• Attorney has represented a couple jointly during

their marriage, their marriage is dissolved, and both former spouses wish to continue using the attorney separately for estate planning purposes

• Attorney is approached to represent the fiduciary
• f an existing client when the client appears to

have lost some mental capacity

• Entire family is involved in meetings and other

communications, and the client’s identity may be ambiguous

Client Confidentiality – Typical Problem Situations

10

Representing Multiple Clients

• May not represent multiple clients

with actual or potential adverse interests unless there is informed written consent. Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 3-310-(c)(1) and (2)

• If a potential conflict becomes an

actual conflict, attorney must get additional informed written consent.

11

Explaining and Managing the Roles of Multiple Parties

• Distinguishing the Roles of Testator v.

Trustee v. Beneficiary

• Family members as agents or advisors in

estate planning transactions

• When family members become clients
• Probate Code Section 21350 problem

when family member actively participates in procuring services and is a beneficiary but is not considered a “related person” – Certificate of Independent Review may be required to carry out client’s intent

12

Conflicts of Interest

• Attorney for Client as Testator
• Attorney for Client as Fiduciary
• Attorney as Beneficiary of Client’s

Estate

13

• Conflicts arising out of disagreement

between attorney and client regarding investment of trust assets or proper exercise of discretion; exercise of authority as conservator or when client lacks capacity

• See Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 3-310(E),

Business and Prof. Code Section 6068(e), Probate Code Section 15642(b)(6) and Probate Code Section 21350

Conflicts of Interest – Attorney as Fiduciary

14

Obtaining Written Informed Consent

• Should be used when there are issues of client confidentiality,

conflict of interest; duty of loyalty especially when representing clients jointly (Cal Rules of Prof Conduct 3-310)

• Representing multiple parties, either jointly or separately
• Representing married couples or RDPs
• Representing client and using family members as designated

agents

• Must make required disclosures (Cal Rules of Prof Conduct 3-

310(A)(2)

• Separate informed consent required if potential or actual

conflict develops after initial engagement

• Client’s decisions should be documented in engagement

letter and notes in attorney file

15

Scope of Services and Fee Issues

• Defining Scope of Services – Bus. and Prof. Code Section

6148(a)(2); scope should include duration and termination

• f services
• Written Agreement Required for more than $1,000 - Bus.

and Prof. Code Section 6148; attorney who does not comply is limited to quantum meruit recovery

• Fees may be paid by third party with full disclosure and

written consent of client as long as attorney assures that third party does not interfere with representation (Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 3-310(F))

• Other Rules regarding legal fees – Probate Code Sections

2645, 10804, 15687 (restricting dual compensation for attorney/fiduciary) in probate matters; Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 3-320 (prohibiting fee-sharing agreements in most circumstances) and 3-310(F) (regarding fees paid by third parties)

16

Determining Capacity to Enter Into Attorney/Client Relationship

• Codified in Due Process in Competence of Determinations

Act (DPCDA) – Probate Code Sections 810 – 813, 1801, 1881, 3201, 3204

• Different standards for contract, conveyance, marriage,

health care decisions, execution of wills and trusts

• DPCDA creates rebuttable presumption that all persons

have capacity to make decisions and be responsible for their acts and decisions (Probate Code Section 810(a)

• “Unsound Mind” or “Lacks Capacity” = mental/physical

disorder diagnosis + evidence of deficit in mental function

• Frequency, severity and duration of periods of impairment

may be taken into account (Probate Code Section 811(c)

• Mere diagnosis of mental disorder is not enough to prove

lack of capacity (Probate Code Section 811(d)

17

Capacity to Contract/Retain Counsel – Probate Code Section 812

• A person lacks capacity unless he/she has ability to
• communicate, verbally or by any other means, the

decision, and

• understand and appreciate the decision to the

extent relevant

• Understand rights, duties and responsibilities

created or affected

• Understand probable consequences of decision for

the decision-maker and/or other persons effected by decision

• Understand significant risks, benefits and

reasonable alternatives involved

18

Capacity to Make Health Care Decisions, Create Will, Trust

• Capacity to Make Health Care Decisions (Probate Code Section

813)

• Respond knowingly, intelligently to questions about treatment
• Participate in treatment decisions through rational thought process
• Understand nature and seriousness of illness, nature of

recommended treatment, probable degree/duration of benefits/risks, consequences of lack of treatment, availability of reasonable alternatives

• Testamentary Capacity not sufficient if (Probate Code Section

6100.5(a)):

• Individual cannot:
• understand nature of testamentary act, or
• cannot understand/recall nature of situation of individual’s property, or
• cannot understand/recall individual’s relationships to living descendants,

spouse, parents, and others whose interests are affected by the will

19

• Standard for capacity to create trust

debated; not codified; See Section 2.51, Complete Plans for Small and Mid-Sized Estates (Cal CEB 2006)

• Capacity to Contract – Hess, Bogert &

Bogert, The Law of Trusts and Trustees (3d ed 2000)

• Capacity to transfer property – 13 Witkin,

Summary of California Law, Trusts Section 25 (10th ed 2005); Walton v. Bank of Cal. (1963) 218 CA2d 527, 541

• Capacity to contract = capacity to appoint

agent (Probate Code Section 4120)

Capacity to Make Medical Decisions, Create Will, Trust

20

Determining Capacity – Attorney’s Role

• Attorney’s duty to determine capacity

before going on with the estate planning process

• Attorney is prohibited from seeking

appointment of a guardian or conservator for an apparently impaired client, or even seeking consultation with physician, without client’s written consent; see Cal State Bar Formal Opinion No. 89-112 – rule is contrary to ABA Model Rules and majority of other jurisdictions

21

Elder Abuse and Protecting Client from Other Types of Harm

• What is Elder Abuse?
• What is attorney’s responsibility

when elder abuse is alleged or suspected?

• What should attorney do if a

conservatorship is needed for a clearly impaired client?

22

Certificate of Independent Review

• Intended to prevent undue influence

by persons in unique position to take advantage of senior or adult with diminished capacity

• Probate Code Section 21350 et seq.
• Requires a CIR when testamentary

gift to prohibited individuals

23

Other Attorney Duties

• Is there a duty to maintain client

documents?

• What if the attorney offers to

maintain client documents and is there a difference between maintaining originals versus copies?

24