ALUC 101 Impetus for ALUCP Update Preliminary ALUCP Changes ALUC - PDF document

1  ALUC 101  Impetus for ALUCP Update  Preliminary ALUCP Changes  ALUC Fee Structure  ALUC Input Items 2 1

 Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) designated as the ALUC  Adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan in 2000 ◦ Auburn Municipal ◦ Blue Canyon ◦ Lincoln Regional 3  Protect public health, safety & welfare  Promote orderly airport development  Minimize airport land use compatibility conflicts  Adopt an ALUCP  Review local agency actions 4 2

 No authority over airport operations  No authority over existing land uses  No direct ability to implement land use measures 5 ALUCP ALUCP Airport Airport Gener Ge neral Plan l Plan Mast Master Plan er Plan Geographic Within On-Airport Within Scope Airport Influence Property City Limits and Area Sphere of Influence Purpose Promote Guide Guide airport/land use development of land use compatibility airport facilities development Airport General ALUCP Master Plan Plan 6 3

7 Zone Zone Locat Location Noise oise Impac Impact Risk Lev Risk Level A Runway Protection Zone Very High Very High B1 B1 Approach/Departure Zone High High B2 B2 Adjacent to Runway Mod–High Low–Mod Extended Approach/Departure Zone & Primary C1 C1 Moderate Moderate Traffic Pattern C2 C2 Other Traffic Pattern Moderate Mod-Low D Other Airport Environs Low Low He Height Re ht Review ew Over Overlay High Terrain Low Moderate 8 4

Max Res Max Res Max Other Max Other Uses Uses Additional Crit Add Criteria & & Deve Develo lopment Zone Zone Density Densi Intens Intensity Range Range Req’ eq’d Open Land Open Land Condit itio ions No structures A 0 du/ac 10 pp/ac All Remaining Avigation easement B1 B1 0.1 du/ac 25-65 pp/ac 30% No schools, hospitals, etc. Review of objects >35 feet B2 B2 0.1 du/ac 50-130 pp/ac No Req’t Avigation easement No schools, hospitals, etc. C1 C1 0.5 du/ac 75-195 pp/ac 20% Review of objects >70 feet Deed notice No schools, hospitals, etc. C2 C2 No Limit 100 -390 pp/ac 10% Review of objects >70 feet Deed notice Discourage schools, hospitals D No Limit No Limit No Req’t Review of objects >150 feet He Height ht Same as Underlying Same as Underlying Zone Re Review view NA Compatibility Zone Avigation easement Overlay Over 9  Master plans adopted in 2007 for Auburn Municipal and Lincoln Regional Airports  New ALUC guidance published by Caltrans Division of Aeronautics in 2011  Highway 65 bypass west of Lincoln Regional Airport completed in 2012 10 5

ALUCP Background Policy Stakeholder Kickoff Data Review Meetings Sep - 2012 Dec - 2012 March June/July Draft ALUC ALUC Public ALUCP & Hearings Workshop Review CEQA November/ August October September December 11  Enhance procedural polices  Modify compatibility zones  Relax density/intensity criteria consistent with Handbook  Reformat/restructure ALUCP 12 6

13  Modest change to ALUC’s list of “Major Land Use Actions”  ALUC secretary review of Major Land Use Actions  Infill policy  Temporary uses  Exception for expansion of existing uses 14 7

Comparis ison on of I Intensit ity C Criter eria ia Curre rrent nt 2011 Handb 2011 Handbook 2000 ALUCP 2000 ALUCP Subu Suburban Safe Safety Cri Criteria Crit Criteria Safety Sa Co Composite Zon one Av Averag erage Sin ingle-Acre re Averag Av erage Sin ingle-Acre re Zone Zo A 0 10 1 0 FAA criteria B1 B1 25 50 2 40-60 80-120 B2 B2 50 100 5 70-100 210-300 C1 C1 75 150 4 and 3 70-150 210-450 C2 C2 100 300 6 200-300 800-1,200 D No Limit No Limit NA NA NA 15 Comparison of Density Criteria Current 2011 Handbook 2000 ALUCP Suburban Safety Criteria Criteria Composite Zone Density Safety Zone Density Runway Protection Zone 0 1 0 Inner Approach/Departure 1 du/10 acres 2 1 du/10 ‐ 20 acres Adjacent to Runway 1 du/10 acres 5 1 du/1 ‐ 2 acres Extended Approach/Departure 1 du/2 acres 3 and 4 1 du/2 ‐ 5 acres Consider noise and Traffic Pattern 1 du/2 acres 6 overflight issues Outer Portions of No Limit NA NA Airport Influence Area 16 8

17 18 9

19 20 10

 Recommend enlarging Zone A to encompass RPZs  No other changes to zone boundaries or AIA proposed 21 Adding cross hatch to highlight special conditions area 22 11

 Provide greatest protection of airport  Place ALUCP on hold to allow master plan update  Infill policy should require ALUC approval of infill areas 23 24 12

25 26 13

27 28 14

 Airport master plan proposes northerly runway extension  Recommend shifting compatibility zones accordingly 29  Relax ALUCP restrictions to the extent feasible  Create separate ALUCP document  Include an infill policy 30 15

31 32 16

 Section 21671.5(f) of the State Aeronautics Act enables ALUCs to charge fees if an ALUCP has been adopted  Fees cannot exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the review 33  Fee scheduled adopted in 1997  Change in fees requires consent by Placer County and Cities of Auburn and Lincoln  No change to fee schedule since 1997  $35 – minor projects  $70 – large projects  $150 – Subdivisions/EIRs 34 17

 Nevada County (2010): ◦ $150 referral charge ◦ $2,500 minimum deposit for outside services required  El Dorado County (2012) ◦ $500 – Airport master plan consistency ◦ $400 – EIR review, major subdivisions, general plan updates ◦ $250 – Rezoning, development plans ◦ $150 – Use permits, minor subdivisions ◦ $55 – Notice of preparation  SACOG/ALUC does not establish fees for conducting consistency reviews 35  Flat referral fee plus minimum deposit amount for:  Projects always requiring ALUC review  Major Land Use Actions  ALUC appeals  (consultant / counsel services may be required)  Project amendments  Jurisdictions to reflect ALUC fee schedule in own fee schedule  Voluntary reviews 36 18

37  Secretary review of Major Land Use Actions  Infill policy  Expansion exception for existing uses  Temporary uses  Different criteria for airports  Separate plans or chapters  Delay ALUCP update  ALUC fee structure – recover cost or subsidize 38 19