ALUC 101 Impetus for ALUCP Update Preliminary ALUCP Changes ALUC - - PDF document

1

1

• ALUC 101
• Impetus for ALUCP Update
• Preliminary ALUCP Changes
• ALUC Fee Structure
• ALUC Input Items

2

2

 Placer County Transportation Planning

Agency (PCTPA) designated as the ALUC

 Adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan

in 2000

• Auburn Municipal
• Blue Canyon
• Lincoln Regional

3

 Protect public health, safety & welfare  Promote orderly airport development  Minimize airport land use compatibility

conflicts

 Adopt an ALUCP  Review local agency actions

4

3

 No authority over airport operations  No authority over existing land uses  No direct ability to implement land use

measures

5 6

ALUCP Airport ALUCP Airport Mast Master Plan er Plan Ge Gener neral Plan l Plan Geographic Scope Within Airport Influence Area On-Airport Property Within City Limits and Sphere of Influence Purpose Promote airport/land use compatibility Guide development of airport facilities Guide land use development Airport Master Plan ALUCP General Plan

4

7 8

Zone Zone Locat Location Noise

• ise Impac

Impact Risk Risk Lev Level A Runway Protection Zone Very High Very High B1 B1 Approach/Departure Zone High High B2 B2 Adjacent to Runway Mod–High Low–Mod C1 C1 Extended Approach/Departure Zone & Primary Traffic Pattern Moderate Moderate C2 C2 Other Traffic Pattern Moderate Mod-Low D Other Airport Environs Low Low He Height Re ht Review ew Over Overlay High Terrain Low Moderate

5

9

Zone Zone Max Res Max Res Densi Density Max Other Max Other Uses Uses Intens Intensity Range Range Req’ eq’d Open Land Open Land Add Additional Crit Criteria & & Deve Develo lopment Condit itio ions A 0 du/ac 10 pp/ac All Remaining No structures Avigation easement B1 B1 0.1 du/ac 25-65 pp/ac 30% No schools, hospitals, etc. Review of objects >35 feet Avigation easement B2 B2 0.1 du/ac 50-130 pp/ac No Req’t C1 C1 0.5 du/ac 75-195 pp/ac 20% No schools, hospitals, etc. Review of objects >70 feet Deed notice C2 C2 No Limit 100 -390 pp/ac 10% No schools, hospitals, etc. Review of objects >70 feet Deed notice D No Limit No Limit No Req’t Discourage schools, hospitals Review of objects >150 feet He Height ht Re Review view Over Overlay Same as Underlying Compatibility Zone NA Same as Underlying Zone Avigation easement

• Master plans adopted in 2007 for Auburn

Municipal and Lincoln Regional Airports

• New ALUC guidance published by Caltrans

Division of Aeronautics in 2011

• Highway 65 bypass west of Lincoln Regional

Airport completed in 2012

10

6

11

ALUCP Kickoff Sep - 2012 Background Data Dec - 2012 Policy Review March Stakeholder Meetings June/July

ALUC Workshop August Draft ALUCP & CEQA September Public Review October ALUC Hearings November/ December

• Enhance procedural polices
• Modify compatibility zones
• Relax density/intensity criteria consistent

with Handbook

• Reformat/restructure ALUCP

12

7

13

• Modest change to ALUC’s list of “Major Land

Use Actions”

• ALUC secretary review of Major Land Use

Actions

• Infill policy
• Temporary uses
• Exception for expansion of existing uses

14

8

15

Comparis ison

• n of I

Intensit ity C Criter eria ia Curre rrent nt 2000 ALUCP 2000 ALUCP Crit Criteria 2011 Handb 2011 Handbook Subu Suburban Safe Safety Cri Criteria Co Composite Zon

• ne

Av Averag erage Sin ingle-Acre re Sa Safety Zo Zone Av Averag erage Sin ingle-Acre re A

10 1 FAA criteria

B1 B1

25 50 2 40-60 80-120

B2 B2

50 100 5 70-100 210-300

C1 C1

75 150 4 and 3 70-150 210-450

C2 C2

100 300 6 200-300 800-1,200

D

No Limit No Limit NA NA NA

Comparison of Density Criteria Current 2000 ALUCP Criteria 2011 Handbook Suburban Safety Criteria Composite Zone Density Safety Zone Density Runway Protection Zone 1 Inner Approach/Departure 1 du/10 acres 2 1 du/10‐20 acres Adjacent to Runway 1 du/10 acres 5 1 du/1‐2 acres Extended Approach/Departure 1 du/2 acres 3 and 4 1 du/2‐5 acres Traffic Pattern 1 du/2 acres 6 Consider noise and

• verflight issues

Outer Portions of Airport Influence Area No Limit NA NA

16

9

17 18

10

19 20

11

• Recommend enlarging Zone A to encompass RPZs
• No other changes to zone boundaries or AIA

proposed

21 22

Adding cross hatch to highlight special conditions area

12

• Provide greatest protection of airport
• Place ALUCP on hold to allow master plan

update

• Infill policy should require ALUC approval
• f infill areas

23 24

13

25 26

14

27 28

15

• Airport master plan

proposes northerly runway extension

• Recommend shifting

compatibility zones accordingly

29

• Relax ALUCP restrictions to the extent

feasible

• Create separate ALUCP document
• Include an infill policy

30

16

31 32

17

• Section 21671.5(f) of the State Aeronautics Act

enables ALUCs to charge fees if an ALUCP has been adopted

• Fees cannot exceed the estimated reasonable

cost of providing the review

33

• Fee scheduled adopted in 1997
• Change in fees requires consent by Placer

County and Cities of Auburn and Lincoln

• No change to fee schedule since 1997
• $35 – minor projects
• $70 – large projects
• $150 – Subdivisions/EIRs

34

18

 Nevada County (2010):

• $150 referral charge
• $2,500 minimum deposit for outside services

required

 El Dorado County (2012)

• $500 – Airport master plan consistency
• $400 – EIR review, major subdivisions, general

plan updates

• $250 – Rezoning, development plans
• $150 – Use permits, minor subdivisions
• $55 – Notice of preparation

 SACOG/ALUC does not establish fees for

conducting consistency reviews

35

 Flat referral fee plus minimum deposit

amount for:

 Projects always requiring ALUC review  Major Land Use Actions  ALUC appeals

 (consultant / counsel services may be required)

 Project amendments

 Jurisdictions to reflect ALUC fee schedule in

• wn fee schedule

 Voluntary reviews

36

19

37

• Secretary review of Major Land Use Actions
• Infill policy
• Expansion exception for existing uses
• Temporary uses
• Different criteria for airports
• Separate plans or chapters
• Delay ALUCP update
• ALUC fee structure – recover cost or subsidize

38