advanced use of databases in the hybrid structural
play

Advanced use of databases in the hybrid structural research: PDB - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kristina Djinovi -Carugo Advanced use of databases in the hybrid structural research: PDB Department of Structural and Computational Biology Max Perutz Labs University of Vienna Austria EMBO Global WS: Structural and biophysical methods


  1. Kristina Djinovi ć -Carugo Advanced use of databases in the hybrid structural research: PDB Department of Structural and Computational Biology Max Perutz Labs University of Vienna Austria EMBO Global WS: Structural and biophysical methods for biological macromolecules in solution Santiago, 20 th October 2019

  2. Structural databases • PDB • 156954 • SASDB • 1848 • EM • 4026

  3. Statistics by method

  4. PDB Growth of Released Structures Per Year

  5. Pathway for generation of 3D structure

  6. Pathway o Exp xperiments : Crystallisation, X-ray diffraction o Co Computatio ional : Structure determination, refinement, analysis

  7. Why a crystal • X-ray scattering from a single molecule would be very weak and could not be detected above the noise level • A crystal arranges large numbers of molecules in the same orientation • Scattered waves can add up in phase and raise the signal to a measurable level • Crystal acts as an amplifier

  8. Why crystal • The waves add up in phase in some directions and have to cancel out in other directions • X-rays diffracted from a crystal and detected on a flat 2D-detector

  9. Image of molecule: electron density distribution • Electromagnetic radiation interacts with matter through its fluctuating electric field • The result of an X-ray crystallographic experiment is the distribution of electrons in the molecule

  10. Image of molecule – electron density

  11. MIR – trace an electron density map

  12. Final result of structure determination (is none of what you see)

  13. Final result: atomic 3D coordinates

  14. Crystallographic terms

  15. Reflection - Intensity • Intensities of diffracted beams are measured • Reflections, I – intensities ! " = |F o | - structure factor amplitudes •

  16. Resolution • RES = ½ [ λ /sin( θ )] • Detail that can be resolved in electron density maps • C α -C β : 1.54 Å

  17. Resolution of electron density map and consequently of the 3D model 1.0 Å 2.5 Å 3.0 Å 4.0 Å

  18. Resolution of electron density map • 1 Å resolution individual atoms can be fitted

  19. Resolution of electron density map • Alpha-helices are clear at 6 Å resolution, but beta-strands are not. • At lower resolutions than about 8 Å, only whole molecules can be placed.

  20. RES in PDB

  21. RES in PDB

  22. R factor å - Fobs Fcalc h h = R h å Fobs h h • |F o | | - from measu sured diffraction intensity • Experimental data • |F |Fc| | - cal calcul culat ated ed from coordinates • Global measure of agreement between experiment and the model • Surface residues can be less recognizable

  23. R free å - Fobs Fcalc h h = R h å Fobs h h • Calculated for 5-10% of reflections not used in refinement • How well the model agrees with the data that it has not been fit to

  24. R/R free • For most structures refined at RES=2.5 Å, R is less than 0.2 and R free less than 0.25

  25. R free in PDB

  26. RES and R factor for ranking • Ranking of quality of structures # Q = $%& − R • Higher RES and lower R are associated with higher Q • RES(1) = 2.0; R(1) = 0.18; Q(1) = 0.32 • RES(1) = 1.5; R(1) = 0.16; Q(1) = 0.51

  27. Thermal motion • B iso = isotropic thermal factor • B iso = 8 π 2 <u> 2 • u = mean amplitude of displacement from the mean position • B iso = 0 Å 2 at T = 0 K

  28. Thermal motion B iso B aniso 3 coordinates + 1B 3 coordinates + 6B

  29. Thermal motion

  30. Atomic displacement parameters (B) • B main < B side • B absorb lattice defects, large scale movements, disorder

  31. Atomic displacement parameters (B) • B abso sorb lattice defects, large scale movements, disorder • I nf nform orm on on funct unction on • Access to internal cavities, substrate channels • Correlation between thermal stability and thermal motions/flexibility

  32. T of experiment • X-tal structures @ T = 100 K • NMR @ RT

  33. T of experiment • 160K – 200K proteins undergo a phase transition • Conformational disorder goes from dynamic to static • Lower T reduces conformational distribution of sidechains: • à smaller and more packed and unique modes

  34. Flowchart/Crystallographic terms Protein Solution Heavy Atom Derivative Crystals a, b, c, a , b , g , symmetry, |F o | h, k, l, |F P | h, k, l, |F PH | solvent content, # mol./a.u. a P Electron density r (x,y,z) h, k, l, |F calc |, a calc Structure (x i ,y i ,z i ,B i ) R-factor Publication, …

  35. Folds and new folds

  36. Redundancy of PDB • 135787 Biological Macromolecular Structures

  37. Why redundancy… • Cove ver a limited sp space of biological ma macro romo molecular r unive verse se • Same or similar proteins, e.g. • Lysozyme > 500 entries • Membrane proteins : 2-3% PDB entries • 15% - 35% of human proteome • Intrinsically disordered proteins…

  38. Non redundant PDB subsets • PDBse select : reject proteins with aa sequence identity > threshold • http://bioinfo.tg.fh-giessen.de/pdbselect/ • PI PISC SCES ES : download precompiled datasets • dunbrack.fccc.edu/PISCES.php • “ Adva vanced se search utility ” in PDB • Ski kip-Re Redundant of EMBOSS • Cd Cd-hi hit • http://weizhongli-lab.org/cd-hit/

  39. … but sequence is not all • Same sequence can adopt 2 different structures • e.g.: Calmodulin

  40. … but sequence is not all • Same sequence can adopt 2 different structures • e.g.: Calmodulin-like domain from alpha-actinin-1 Drmota et al, Sci Rep, 2016)

  41. CHECK FIGURES OF MERIT, STEREOCHEMISTRY

  42. Missing residues • Interpretation of electron density ( ρ ) allows positioning of atoms • Sometimes ρ is elusive and thus positioning of atoms uncertain or impossible

  43. Treatments of invisible residues/atoms • Omit the atoms/ s/aa resi sidues • Amino acid residues ‘torsos’ • … molecular graphics not always warns about missign atoms

  44. Treatments of invisible residues/atoms • Leave ve the atom in the model with occupancy y 0 • No alert by molecular graphics

  45. Example “Torso”

  46. Treatments of invisible residues/atoms • Leave ve the atom in the model à larg rge B B factors rs • Easily visualized by molecular graphics

  47. Occurrence of invisible residues/atoms • 20% of structures at atomic RES contain invisible residues • 80% of structures 1.5 Å RES contain 80% of invisible residues • At atomic RES 2-3% residues are invisible • At 2.0 Å RES 7% residues are invisible • At 3.0 Å RES 10% residues are invisible

  48. Reasons for invisible residues/atoms • Proteolysis Ltd • Quality/quantity of diffraction data • Conformational disorder

  49. …caveat • Invi visi sible resi sidues s are often on su surfaces • Caution if surface properties are investigated: • Electrostatic potential K43

  50. …caveat • Invisible residues are often on surfaces • Caution if surface properties are investigated: • Electrostatic potential calculation is affected! “Torso”

  51. Conformational disorder / Occupancy • Residues/atoms do not reside on the same position in all residue/atoms in all molecules in the crystal/ensemble • à weak electron density à invisible • At medium/high RES observe multiple conformations • Static disorder • Dynamic disorder

  52. Static/dynamic disorder • St Static : two or more conformations exist • Dyn ynamic (at higher T): shuffling from one conformation to another • Crystal structure determination gives time and space averaged structural information • à cannot distinguish between static and dynamic disorder

  53. Alternative conformations The su sum of occupancies s of both posi sitions s conformations s is s 1

  54. Disorder continued… • Occupancy y of atoms/ s/resi sidues s is s < 1 • Ligand is not bound to a fraction of molecules in the crystal • Weak binding, suboptimal binding conditions • Misplaced ligand • Partial disorder • X-ray induced radiation damage • loss of carboxylates, methyl groups…

  55. Partial disorder of the ligand • Weichenberger et al. • Volume 73 | Part 3 | March 2017 | Pages 211–222 | 10.1107/S205979831601620X

  56. Radiation damage at work • Garman • Volume 66 | Part 4 | April 2010 | Pages 339–351 | 10.1107/S0907444910008656

  57. …caveat • Molecular graphics shows all alternative conformations • Surface properties calculation with all conformations!

  58. Stereochemistry • Is the protein stereo-chemically sound? • Covalent distances, angles, torsion angles, backbone conformation, group planarity, chirality, H-bonds, electrostatic interactions

  59. Ramachandran plot

  60. Ideal stereochemical parameters Peptide bond Average Single Bond Average Cα - C 1.53 (Å) C - C 1.54 (Å) C - N 1.33 (Å) C - N 1.48 (Å) N - Cα 1.46 (Å) C - O 1.43 (Å) Hydrogen Bond Average ( � 0.3) O-H --- O-H 2.8 (Å) N-H --- O=C 2.9 (Å) O-H --- O=C 2.8 (Å) Rms deviations from ideal geometry: bond length 0.01 - 0.02 Å bond angles: 1.2 - 1.5 deg

  61. Tools to check stereochemistry • Procheck • What_Check • MolProbity • ProSA • PDB – validation protocol, which examines also fit of experimental data

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend