Advanced Dielectric Wakefield Accelerator Structures
- G. Andonian
Advanced Dielectric Wakefield Accelerator Structures G. Andonian - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Advanced Dielectric Wakefield Accelerator Structures G. Andonian May 10, 2018 FAST/IOTA CollaboraEon MeeEng Fermilab Outline DWA background Relevant Issues & research direcEons Advanced structures & applicaEons Bragg
Accelerator (GV/m field)
material
geometry
scale to sub-mm (THz) structures
eEz,dec ≈ −4Nbr
emec 2
a 8π ε −1 εσ z + a ' ( ) * + , Design parameters:
1.¥10-12
0.5 1.0
On-axis Ez (single mode structure)
!
!" =
! 2! 2!! ! − 1 !!(! − !)
– HEP: future machine (GV/m fields)
– Light Source
– Phase Space manipulaEon – RelaEvisEc e-beam diagnosEcs – THz source
– PracEcally achievable field gradients
– Beam break up – transverse modes – Efficiency, TR – Materials/cladding composiEon – Alternate geometries (slab, woodpile)
– 3nC, σz=20µm – Cylindrical geometry – In long (>15 cm) structures – Damping effects (reversible) before reaching breakdown due to high field
SiO2 Vacuum Channel Metal Cladding
100µm
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 −0.25 −0.2 −0.15 −0.1 −0.05 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
KK Reconstruction of the 1 CM Data ζ Position [mm] Intensity [a.u.]
Beam Wake O’Shea Nat Comm 7, 12763 (2016)
– Metal ablaEon at high fields in first tests – Explore alternate geometry with no metal
– Bragg arrays – AlternaEng mulElayer stack (high/low ε) – ConstrucEve interference – Modal confinement in channel
– SiO2 (ε=3.8) matching layer – Bragg layers: SiO2, ZTA (ε=10.6), 12 periods – L = 1cm – Gap = 240 µm Metal ablaEon
e-beam dm d1 d2 2a (a)
dm d1 d2 2a (b)
Photo of Bragg array
c)
– Characterize structure modes
– 57MeV, 100pC, σt~1ps – CCR spectral analysis – ReconstrucEon algorithm – Energy modulaEon measured – Agreement with theory/ simulaEon (3D Vorpal, CST)
– Bragg reflector performance – Modal purity for THz source apps
5.0x1011 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.0x1012 1.5x1012
Frequency [Hz] Spectral Intensity [arb. units]
0.000 0.002
0.0 0.5 1.0
Step Size [m] Signal [arb. units]
10 12 14 16 18 20 z [mm]
0.5 1.0 1.5 Longitudinal Field [MV/m] z [m]
2.5x106 0.0 y [m] 0.0085 0.0117 0.0149 0.0181 0.0213
0.0000 0.0015 0.0030 Ez [V/m] z [m]
2.5x106 0.0 x [m] 0.0085 0.0117 0.0149 0.0181 0.0213
0.0000 0.0015 0.0030 Ez [V/m]
210GHz
CCR AutocorrelaEon
– C. Li et al., PRSTAB 17, 091302 (2014)
– A. Tremaine et al., PRE 56, 7204 (1997) – D. Mihalcea et al., PRSTAB 15, 081304 (2012) – S. Baturin in prep (2018) “Trade-off” curves as funcEon of beam ellipEcity Ez Fy
“deflecEon” vs offset
Offset [µm]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
10 cm, 400/600 um, no offset
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Frequency [THz]
10 cm, 400/600 um, 30 um offset
HEM11 TM01 HEM21 TM02
30µm
Observed at low energy @ PSI
“Passive streaker” BeIoni, et al., PRAB 19, 021304 (2016)
TM01
e-
– Drive slab geometry with ellipEcal beams – measure effects of deflecEon modes
e-beam
a b L
SiO2 Beam Off-axis injecEon vs observed “kick”
−100 −80 −60 −40 −20 20 40 60 80 100 −250 −200 −150 −100 −50 50 100 150 200
Offset in slab [ µm ] Deflection Downstream [ µm ] 1:1 x:y 1:2 x:y 1:3 x:y 1:15 x:y
“round” “flat”
FDTD simulaEon
– Advanced DWA structures – No metals (excessive dissipaEon into heat)
transverse modes (enhance longitudinal)
– Extend to DWA
– 3D-periodicity gives more control – Modes, vg, raEos – Excited modes in bandgap are confined
– For experiment at BNL ATF – 125µm Sapphire rods x 2cm – by hand (P. Hoang)
– 125µm x 2cm sapphire rods – 375µm periodicity in x, and z – 250µm gap – Single period structure to understand dynamics
– 57 Mev, εΝ =2 mm-mrad, σz = 250µm – “round beam”: 50:50 µm, 150 pC – “ellipEcal beam” 50: 500 µm, 235 pC
– Boundary condiEons require computaEon – Flat beam shows only fundamental
Cross secEon (beam perspecEve) Spectrum of woodpile (simulaEons)
– CCR spectral characterizaEon methods – Round beam vs ellipEcal – Shows suppression of spectra – agreement with simulaEons
– Design spectrum – Use bunch length to couple to desired longitudinal modes – Use beam shape to reduce coupling to transverse modes
Interferograms FFT round round ellipEcal ellipEcal
– Triangle distribuEon – Novel: doorstep, double triangles
– EEX, laser shaping, mask in dispersive secEon
– Analogous to bunch train with DWA
studies
– “Ramped” beam observed – CCR autocorrelaEon – DeflecEng cavity
Symmetric beam R<2 Ramped beam R>>2
R = Ez,acc Ez,dec ≤ 2
100 200 300 400 15 20 25 30
temporal axis (pixel count) current (arb. units) No DWS DWS
– Confine energy of mode inside structure – Near zero group velocity – Longitudinal periodicity - ε(z)
– a = 50 µm, b = 126 µm – Periodicity = 300 µm – Used both sinusoidal variance of ε and step – Base materials SiO2, diamond (ε=3.8, 10.6)
– Mode confinement
Standing wave structure seen in sims awer beam has passed through structure (OOPIC)
Excite mode with 4-pulse train - OOPIC DWA with horn antenna Mode confinement of Ez (HFSS)
– Advanced accelerator, THz source – Phase space manipulaEon, beam diagnosEc
– High average current : Charging/ HeaEng quesEons – High quality bunches : Small/long structures – RTFB transform: Flat beam driven planar DWA
– Designer structures for fundamental physics – Spectra by design + Beam by design – Explore limits and possibiliEes
Acknowledgements: UCLA: S. Barber (LBNL), A. Fukusawa, P. Hoang, B. Naranjo, N. Sudar, O. Williams,
Work Supported by US DOE HEP