Adapting Regional Watershed Management to Climate Change The Qubec - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

adapting regional watershed management to
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Adapting Regional Watershed Management to Climate Change The Qubec - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Q ubec - B avarian C ollaboration on C limate C hange Adapting Regional Watershed Management to Climate Change The Qubec -Bavarian Collaboration Project Q-BIC 3 R. Ludwig, M. Muerth, S. Berger, F. Ferber, J. Schmid & W. Mauser


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Québec-Bavarian Collaboration on Climate Change

Adapting Regional Watershed Management to Climate Change – The Québec-Bavarian Collaboration Project Q-BIC3

  • R. Ludwig, M. Muerth, S. Berger,
  • F. Ferber, J. Schmid & W. Mauser

& the team of Q-BIC3

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Q-BIC3

# 2 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

Outline

Outline of the presentation:

  • Key issues of Q-BIC3
  • The Ensemble of Climate Inputs &

Hydrological Models

  • Challenges for Water Management of the

Danube-Main Transfer System

  • Approaches to simulate adaptation of water

management to Climate Change

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Q-BIC3

# 3 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

Key issues of Q-BIC3

  • 1. Identify impacts & adaptation options

for water resource management in Q&B

  • 2. Quantify & reduce projection

uncertainties of the model chain

  • 3. Investigate the required complexity of

hydrological models to estimate CC impacts

  • 4. Develop a regionally transferable and

modular modeling system for integrated watershed management under CC

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Q-BIC3

# 4 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

Regions for the analysis

[1] Gatineau (Rapides- Farmers; 23981 km²), [2] Saint Fracois (Weedon; 2922 km²), [3] Danube (Kehlheimwinzer; 26284 km²), [4] Altmuehl (Eichstaett; 1396 km²), [5] Isar (Munich; 2814 km²), [6] Regnitz (Pettstadt; 6991 km²)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Q-BIC3

# 5 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

Uncertainty of projections Emission Scenarios Climate Modeling & Scenarios Hydrological models Management tools Adaptation strategies

Cumulative uncertainty

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Q-BIC3

# 6 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

Ensemble of climate model data sets

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Q-BIC3

# 7 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

Ensemble of hydrological models

4 watersheds & 4 hydromodels (plus side projects)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Q-BIC3

# 8 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

Challenges for water management I

Regnitz river:

  • Tributary of the Main river
  • winter precipitation regime
  • little ground water storage
  • problem of low flows in summer

Climate Change impacts?

  • dP may further reduce low flows
  • dT may increase water demand for

irrigation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Q-BIC3

# 9 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

Challenges for water management II

Danube-Main water transfer:

  • transfers about about 150 mill. m3/yr
  • Brombach and Roth reservoirs built

for that purpose

  • Even today competition between

recreation & water management

  • Adjustment of rules and structures

to Climate Change needed?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Q-BIC3

# 10 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

Challenges for water management III

Altmühlsee reservoir:

  • Flood protection for Altmühl
  • Water transfer to Regnitz via

Brombach reservoir

  • Eutrophication! - floods

transport suspended sediments from agricultural area, but no constant inflow (Climate Change!)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Q-BIC3

# 11 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

Fuzzy Model of Water Management

The Danube-Main water transfer system is managed by human decisions based on reservoir and gauge levels Fuzzy model of water transfer set up with knowledge-based fuzzification and de- fuzzification rules of management decision

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Q-BIC3

# 12 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

First results for Altmühl lake

First results show that a Water Management Model based on Fuzzy Logic Theory may be appropriate to model the decisions made by water managers

Input is upstream gauge, model computed all three possible water flow quantities

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Q-BIC3

# 13 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

Conclusions

Conclusions

  • Bias correction of RCM data is (still desperately)

needed for hydromodel simulation

  • Hydromodels produce different runoff curves even if

calibrated on same gauge time series

  • Reproduction of the annual cycle of runoff and the

frequencies of high and low flows (or indicators!) are more important than R2 etc.

  • Because water management often uses thresholds,

fuzzy logic seems to increase robustness and adjustability to uncertainties in simulated runoff

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Q-BIC3

# 14 23.09.2010 HydroPredict 2010 Conference, Prague

Thank you

Thank you very much for your attention!!!